Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You may not be aware of this but today AP & honors classes are the regular classes. Over the years these have been watered down so that more people are able to participate. This has affected the rigor of these classes.
Do you have any evidence that the content of the AP US History class (for example) is less rigorous than it used to be at some point in the past (when?)?
Anonymous wrote:You may not be aware of this but today AP & honors classes are the regular classes. Over the years these have been watered down so that more people are able to participate. This has affected the rigor of these classes.
Anonymous wrote:I want to reiterate this for the parents with kids in middle and elementary.
The "academic" classes are remedial. The honors classes at my dc's school are all over the place. In some cases there is barely a difference and the rigor is dependent upon the teacher.
I also hate APs. We have to pay for the class and the tests and the teachers often can't teach the content. Both of my kids barely got Bs in their favorite subject AP classes but got 5s on the AP test. At our school there seems to be a pecking order where the teachers most valued by the administration get to teach the AP classes. They are often not talented in the subject matter they teach. The teachers also get some kind of ego kick for being known as the hard ass ap teacher. The ones with that reputation are very proud of it.
Well its good for an AP teacher to be a hard ass. Its pretty common in private schools for kids that get a B or even C in the class to get a 5 on the test. The test is one test and they honestly are not that hard. For the course to be equal to a freshman level class the class work should be much harder than the test.
There is a really weird perversion toward always "pretending" that everything is advanced and every kid is a brilliant when they are not. Academic success requires hard work, and pushing yourself. Its not an every person wins a trophy or lipstick on a pig thing.
I want to reiterate this for the parents with kids in middle and elementary.
The "academic" classes are remedial. The honors classes at my dc's school are all over the place. In some cases there is barely a difference and the rigor is dependent upon the teacher.
I also hate APs. We have to pay for the class and the tests and the teachers often can't teach the content. Both of my kids barely got Bs in their favorite subject AP classes but got 5s on the AP test. At our school there seems to be a pecking order where the teachers most valued by the administration get to teach the AP classes. They are often not talented in the subject matter they teach. The teachers also get some kind of ego kick for being known as the hard ass ap teacher. The ones with that reputation are very proud of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the non honors is basically remedial level but no one wants to call it remedial because that is offensive to some in this politically correct country. Facts are no longer acceptable. So instead of saying remedial history and regular history, we say history and honors history.
I want to reiterate this for the parents with kids in middle and elementary.
The "academic" classes are remedial. The honors classes at my dc's school are all over the place. In some cases there is barely a difference and the rigor is dependent upon the teacher.
I also hate APs. We have to pay for the class and the tests and the teachers often can't teach the content. Both of my kids barely got Bs in their favorite subject AP classes but got 5s on the AP test. At our school there seems to be a pecking order where the teachers most valued by the administration get to teach the AP classes. They are often not talented in the subject matter they teach. The teachers also get some kind of ego kick for being known as the hard ass ap teacher. The ones with that reputation are very proud of it.
Anonymous wrote:Dual enrollment is much better. It cost less and if you pass the course, you earn college credit.
College Board is a money-maker that now rules public ed.
no thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the non honors is basically remedial level but no one wants to call it remedial because that is offensive to some in this politically correct country. Facts are no longer acceptable. So instead of saying remedial history and regular history, we say history and honors history.
I want to reiterate this for the parents with kids in middle and elementary.
The "academic" classes are remedial. The honors classes at my dc's school are all over the place. In some cases there is barely a difference and the rigor is dependent upon the teacher.
I also hate APs. We have to pay for the class and the tests and the teachers often can't teach the content. Both of my kids barely got Bs in their favorite subject AP classes but got 5s on the AP test. At our school there seems to be a pecking order where the teachers most valued by the administration get to teach the AP classes. They are often not talented in the subject matter they teach. The teachers also get some kind of ego kick for being known as the hard ass ap teacher. The ones with that reputation are very proud of it.
So where did they learn the content, then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the non honors is basically remedial level but no one wants to call it remedial because that is offensive to some in this politically correct country. Facts are no longer acceptable. So instead of saying remedial history and regular history, we say history and honors history.
I want to reiterate this for the parents with kids in middle and elementary.
The "academic" classes are remedial. The honors classes at my dc's school are all over the place. In some cases there is barely a difference and the rigor is dependent upon the teacher.
I also hate APs. We have to pay for the class and the tests and the teachers often can't teach the content. Both of my kids barely got Bs in their favorite subject AP classes but got 5s on the AP test. At our school there seems to be a pecking order where the teachers most valued by the administration get to teach the AP classes. They are often not talented in the subject matter they teach. The teachers also get some kind of ego kick for being known as the hard ass ap teacher. The ones with that reputation are very proud of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much does it cost to do take AP tests?
$94+
We pay $85 per test. If you have multiple kids in high school, add it up. My kids usually take 3 or 4 per year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How much does it cost to do take AP tests?
$94+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The privates will still have kids take the AP exams, they just aren't paying for/using the College Board's AP curriculum. They think they can do it better AND save money
There is no charge and no "curriculum". There is a list of content and themes that will be tested. So money is not the reason these are being dropped by the top private schools. It has to do with their market audience of colleges and creating mystique for parents who will think that the homegrown classes are vastly superior from those offered in public schools. This is how they differentiate and justify high tuition. I know, my D.C. goes to a Big 3, while I teach APs.
Wait, MCPS doesn’t train their AP teachers to teach these classes? They just assume these teachers with a bachelors from Towson can teach like a professor?
Anonymous wrote:Because the non honors is basically remedial level but no one wants to call it remedial because that is offensive to some in this politically correct country. Facts are no longer acceptable. So instead of saying remedial history and regular history, we say history and honors history.