Anonymous wrote:DH is very career oriented - big job and big salary. When we got married he was at a very intense breakpoint in his career and said his obsession with his work was just because of that and that he shared the vision for family life and partnership I wanted. It turns out it wasn't any difference once he made it through that stage, that's who he is. I don't think he meant to lie, I think he wishes he was the person he described, he's just not.
I spend a lot of time and energy cajoling him into engaging in family life. Dragging him out of bed on weekend mornings to join in family outtings, asking him to come downstairs for dinner if he's home for it, reminding him to fulfill some domestic responsibilities etc. While he sometimes he snaps when I'm doing it, he overall at least says he is glad I "push him to be a better person" and "kick his ass" to get moving which he is always happy he did after the fact. Sometimes it works out and we have a lot of fun together, other times he's an ass and it just makes things feel lonelier. I think overall he is glad I push him and is happier with his life for it when his inclination is to spend his downtown sleeping or playing on his phone.
I'm so tired of it and am just considering stopping asking anything of him. I'd hire more help to take care of chores at home, make a career change so I could have the time to meet all the kids' needs, and just leave it to DH to engage with our family or not as he chooses. I don't think the kids would suffer, he'd be like a 1980s dad, he can be super fun and engaged when he's not distracted by work and would spend a couple hours focused on them during the weekend, and I'd fully take on ensuring their need for stability, emotional support, and logistical needs are met.
I'm so tired of having to try to manage him into being part of our family so its tempting to just stop trying. He can get out of bed when he wants on weekends and we'll go about our day without him unless he gets up himself and decides to join, join or not join for dinner, not be responsible for any domestic tasks etc. I'll no longer have to think how to kindly / funnily cajole him into participating. But I also feel like it'd make him not feel like a life partner at all - more a financial supporter who is nice to fun around periodically when he decides - and that's really sad for a marriage.
Couple other data points - divorce isn't on the table, while there may be better partners out there (or no partner at all) my life overall isn't nearly unhappy enough to cause all the upheaval and damage of a divorce. Also DH does struggle with anxiety and depression, he is on medication for it and is likely as good as he's able / willing to get (I imagine more CBT would help but he's not interested). I think his running rate is having some depression type behaviors (wants to sleep a lot, fun activities feel like work) but his anxiety / depression don't swing dramatically or cause a lot of drama in and of themselves.
Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I did this for a time with my DH who also has a lot of similar issues with your DH's behaviors (wants to sleep a lot, fun activities feel like work + anxiety). I was fairly vocal about telling him how much I was doing and how little he was doing and that wasn't working out for me. So I stopped expecting anything from him and did everything myself. Slowly, he stepped up. But it was more about what the kids needed from him as they were older. He could more easily meet their needs. He wasn't great with small children.
Around what ages did that start happening? Mine are currently 2 and 1 and unfortunately its a self fulling cycle right now that the less around their dad is the more they prefer me so the easier it is for dad to check-out. They're both boys and I'm hoping when they're older they'll actively want dad more and DH will feel like its more critical for him to engage.
Anonymous wrote:We get what we expect, OP, and I think it is worth considering how much *you* are contributing to this dynamic and just replicating your childhood structure.
I am non-confrontational (even a doormat at times), but I grew up with a very different family life and it just wouldn't really occur to me to structure my life as you have. E.g. DH and I switched off with getting up with the kids as babies b/c I just asked well should we alternate, or take different blocs of time, or what? If I wanted better sleep I just went to the guest bedroom and let him deal. We switch off weekend mornings too... Mostly I just grocery shop in peace my "morning off." I don't think this is something that he would have ever eagerly volunteered for but I can't imagine him really grousing or yelling about the division of labor, and if he did, I would just be like what the heck are you doing?
In other words, OP, if you don't like your dynamic, just stop participating in it. It doesn't have to be a fight. Do a yoga class on Saturday morning. Ask whether he wants to do the dishes or get the kids ready for bed. Say you need him to do pick up on W & Th, and then *don't be available.* If he in fact has some true job constraints then that is where you start outsourcing. So yeah, I'd "drop the rope," but in the opposite way that you are suggesting.
Anonymous wrote:Go for it. Your plan sounds totally fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea that your kids will not suffer because of your DHs issues is insane. Divorce or not he is not a present father and that will have ramifications.
While they'd ideally have a more day to day engaged dad, I don't think they will "suffer". He can be a super fun dad and in an emergency he'd go to the end of the earth for him. In the day to day he's happy to leave the day to day monotony to someone else. I grew up with a dad kind of like him, he would take me on long bike rides on the weekends, and in general be fun and loving for chunks of weekend time and not part of week-day life, I knew he was "there" for me etc....but I got all of my day to day needs and security from my mom. I honestly think at the end of the day my dad is the only one that suffered from it, I know he loves and supports me but I will never be as close to him as I am with my mom and I think he's a bit lonely now that he is retired and has time for family but doesn't have the very close connection. So yes my life could have been a little better if I had a deeper emotional connection with my dad, but childhood was still really good b/c all of my emotional / logistical / security etc needs were still met by my mom and a lot of happy kids have family dynamics like that.
Uh, you married your dad. That is the ramification of having a DH like yours. Do you want your kids to think that is the best example of a father? He wants to sleep in instead of spend time with his kids? You basically have repeated the same mistake because you were conditioned to think this is how it’s supposed to be.
Agreed. The end result is that your boys will be just like your DH and their grandfather. Like it or not, those are your core family values. It’s not terrible but not good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea that your kids will not suffer because of your DHs issues is insane. Divorce or not he is not a present father and that will have ramifications.
While they'd ideally have a more day to day engaged dad, I don't think they will "suffer". He can be a super fun dad and in an emergency he'd go to the end of the earth for him. In the day to day he's happy to leave the day to day monotony to someone else. I grew up with a dad kind of like him, he would take me on long bike rides on the weekends, and in general be fun and loving for chunks of weekend time and not part of week-day life, I knew he was "there" for me etc....but I got all of my day to day needs and security from my mom. I honestly think at the end of the day my dad is the only one that suffered from it, I know he loves and supports me but I will never be as close to him as I am with my mom and I think he's a bit lonely now that he is retired and has time for family but doesn't have the very close connection. So yes my life could have been a little better if I had a deeper emotional connection with my dad, but childhood was still really good b/c all of my emotional / logistical / security etc needs were still met by my mom and a lot of happy kids have family dynamics like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea that your kids will not suffer because of your DHs issues is insane. Divorce or not he is not a present father and that will have ramifications.
While they'd ideally have a more day to day engaged dad, I don't think they will "suffer". He can be a super fun dad and in an emergency he'd go to the end of the earth for him. In the day to day he's happy to leave the day to day monotony to someone else. I grew up with a dad kind of like him, he would take me on long bike rides on the weekends, and in general be fun and loving for chunks of weekend time and not part of week-day life, I knew he was "there" for me etc....but I got all of my day to day needs and security from my mom. I honestly think at the end of the day my dad is the only one that suffered from it, I know he loves and supports me but I will never be as close to him as I am with my mom and I think he's a bit lonely now that he is retired and has time for family but doesn't have the very close connection. So yes my life could have been a little better if I had a deeper emotional connection with my dad, but childhood was still really good b/c all of my emotional / logistical / security etc needs were still met by my mom and a lot of happy kids have family dynamics like that.
Uh, you married your dad. That is the ramification of having a DH like yours. Do you want your kids to think that is the best example of a father? He wants to sleep in instead of spend time with his kids? You basically have repeated the same mistake because you were conditioned to think this is how it’s supposed to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not wrong. It’s dishonest to marry a big earner, reap the benefits and then bail out of the agreement in the middle, causing tremendous family turmoil.
At least wait until the kids are grown - it’s the respectable thing to do.
Again, read the OP. It sounds like the balance of family life was discussed and OP was given the impression that the work intensity would die down, and it didn't. Perhaps she should have believed what she was seeing, rather than what he was saying. But for the love of God, drop the obsession with insisting that women all marry for "big money". Most of us don't want to partner with wealthy, uninvolved men. Including OP.
But she definitely DID.
I did not. I have a husband who is around. We do not have interesting/pricey family vacations and many other things and in fact struggle to pay regular debts. It’s fine though. And it’s not like some utopia where I also then don’t have to also work to smooth things over between DH and the kids sometimes. A lot at some ages. All marriages and family relationships take work and compromise, not just yours. The grass is not greener.