Anonymous wrote:It seems like school don't "care" about nut allergies after elementary school. They seem to only really police food brought in while kids are younger and may not have the ability to recognize the offending food or ask what's in a food.
I was curious so I looked up the policy for my kids' MS & HS and both have two pages on the responsibility of the person allergic to the food item and responsibility of the parents of the kid allergic to the food item, but only a tiny blurb that says: no student shall knowingly contaminate another student's food in regards to an allergy to one of the aforementioned common food allergy types or any other known food allergy of the student. No student shall weaponize the allergy in a harmful or potentially dangerous manner, this includes, but is not limited to touching a student with a known allergy after handling the offending allergen, intentionally breathing on a student with a known allergy after ingesting the offending allergen, or touching the offending allergen upon the student's person or possessions.
Peanuts are sold at the basketball and football games in HS as well now that I think about it.
Anonymous wrote:I always want to challenge the people who think the only policy is no nuts to give me a nutritionally comparable snack. That means something that is mostly protein and fat, not full of sugar or carbs, something grain free. Dried fruits, dairy (plus refrigeration issues) granola, crackers, etc., none of these qualify.
Anonymous wrote:Nuts are find for Middle School, by this age the kids can handle their own allergies. Do they ride a bus? Play sports or some other team or group activity? Then they will come in contact with something they may have an allergy to. If you can send your child with a small pack of wipes for their hands for afterwards, even better.
For all those who don't want her child being nut's, what do you suggest that is high in protein, low in sugar, doesn't make a mess as you eat, is a SNACK (not a lunch) and will keep a growing teen with food issues satisfied? Because raisins are not it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to diminish the severity of nut allergies.
I do want to point out that there are other serious health challenges that kids face where they need shelf-stable sources of protein, or have other serious restrictions on their diet.
Screaming NO NUTS NO NUTS does not make it easy for these families who may rely on nuts to keep their kids whole and functioning. Finding reasonable solutions to accommodate all children is a more appropriate strategy.
For the win.
People need to listen, not just scream.
Anonymous wrote:No, no no... don't do that as its really selfish. There are tons of things they can eat from pretzels to cereal/granola bars, etc. that have no nuts.
Anonymous wrote:I always want to challenge the people who think the only policy is no nuts to give me a nutritionally comparable snack. That means something that is mostly protein and fat, not full of sugar or carbs, something grain free. Dried fruits, dairy (plus refrigeration issues) granola, crackers, etc., none of these qualify.
Anonymous wrote:Op here—school does not have a policy so I guess I can send them.
Anonymous wrote:I don't want to diminish the severity of nut allergies.
I do want to point out that there are other serious health challenges that kids face where they need shelf-stable sources of protein, or have other serious restrictions on their diet.
Screaming NO NUTS NO NUTS does not make it easy for these families who may rely on nuts to keep their kids whole and functioning. Finding reasonable solutions to accommodate all children is a more appropriate strategy.