Anonymous wrote:Annnnnd the PR nightmare continues. You'd think the Queen's household would be able to get a handle on this? If only Phillip had taken a second to apologize.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's interesting that the good samaritan who pulled the passengers out and the local police only mention one man - so no royal police officer with Philip, apparently. This is going to be a headache for the BRF in more than one way.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8222210/prince-philip-legs-car-crash-caused-by-sun/
Yep. Not only was he driving himself at 97 but he apparently ordered his RPOs to stay back. They didn't show up to the scene until AFTER the lawyer who first arrived at the wreck had pulled Prince Phillip out of the car through his window and before that rescued the mother and baby from the car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's just say that 10-month-old will never have to work a day in his/her life.
Not really, that's not how it works in the UK. The baby wasn't injured, the mother had a few cuts and the other woman in the car has a broken wrist, so no serious injuries to anyone. Obviously they will be covered for the damage to the car, and could claim for any loss resulting from needing to take days of work, or perhaps some physiotherapy for the one with the broken wrist, though all of that will probably be on the NHS anyway. The police are investigating the accident and Philip may well be prosecuted (though he could avoid prosecution by surrendering his license), especially if the passengers in the car push for it. But they are unlikely to make much money from bringing a civil claim, as there's no concept of punitive/special damages in English law, and they really didn't suffer much loss.
Exactly. That's an American insanity.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical.
More like terrifying. He's lucky. Incredibly so.
He is lucky. But it is luckier still that his behemoth reinforced Landover didn’t pancake the Kia and kill those passengers, including a 10 month old baby. It’s kind of gross that a brand new replacement car was delivered to Sandringham early today. Not looking like he’s getting off the road. Not a good call for the BRF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's just say that 10-month-old will never have to work a day in his/her life.
Not really, that's not how it works in the UK. The baby wasn't injured, the mother had a few cuts and the other woman in the car has a broken wrist, so no serious injuries to anyone. Obviously they will be covered for the damage to the car, and could claim for any loss resulting from needing to take days of work, or perhaps some physiotherapy for the one with the broken wrist, though all of that will probably be on the NHS anyway. The police are investigating the accident and Philip may well be prosecuted (though he could avoid prosecution by surrendering his license), especially if the passengers in the car push for it. But they are unlikely to make much money from bringing a civil claim, as there's no concept of punitive/special damages in English law, and they really didn't suffer much loss.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical.
More like terrifying. He's lucky. Incredibly so.
Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical.

Anonymous wrote:He needs a self driving car
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's just say that 10-month-old will never have to work a day in his/her life.
Not really, that's not how it works in the UK. The baby wasn't injured, the mother had a few cuts and the other woman in the car has a broken wrist, so no serious injuries to anyone. Obviously they will be covered for the damage to the car, and could claim for any loss resulting from needing to take days of work, or perhaps some physiotherapy for the one with the broken wrist, though all of that will probably be on the NHS anyway. The police are investigating the accident and Philip may well be prosecuted (though he could avoid prosecution by surrendering his license), especially if the passengers in the car push for it. But they are unlikely to make much money from bringing a civil claim, as there's no concept of punitive/special damages in English law, and they really didn't suffer much loss.