Anonymous wrote:https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/g13935674/meghan-markle-friends/

haha. This is hilarious. She was obviously picking and socializing with the highest net worth who's-who of Toronto society.

I'm surprised she was able to connect with them and befriend them given their vastly different backgrounds.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

MM could rewear an outfit, especially a coat, every now and then, you know. High street fashion (mass market brands from a store like Macy's) don't cost a fortune and would have been more appropriate in this instance. It doesn't take a lot of money to dress well, look nice and know your audience.

I repeat, she is tone-deaf. Especially since the British public is critical of her extravagant clothing choices.

There is literally nothing she could wear that you would not criticize her for.

Did you even read my post? Re-wearing a coat for this occasion would have been appropriate. Wearing a store brand/mass market brand would have worked. No, she wants to always promote some new brand. So obnoxious, as some other PP wrote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

MM could rewear an outfit, especially a coat, every now and then, you know. High street fashion (mass market brands from a store like Macy's) don't cost a fortune and would have been more appropriate in this instance. It doesn't take a lot of money to dress well, look nice and know your audience.

I repeat, she is tone-deaf. Especially since the British public is critical of her extravagant clothing choices.

There is literally nothing she could wear that you would not criticize her for.

Did you even read my post? Re-wearing a coat for this occasion would have been appropriate. Wearing a store brand/mass market brand would have worked. No, she wants to always promote some new brand. So obnoxious, as some other PP wrote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has been following the Royals for more than 30 seconds knows that this is their modus operandi. They leaked a lot of negativity about Diana in order to keep her in line before she learn to play the game and turned on them.

The purpose of these leaks is to remind Meghan not to fly too high or get too big a head. They are going to turn the public against her so that she has to retreat further into the royal family for protection and is thereby under control.

Ah, that makes sense. But Diana was a child when she married Charles. Meghan is a grown woman who knows how to stand up for herself. I think Harry picked her for good reason.

PP here. Even a grown woman is going to have trouble coming up against the Royal machine. They have experts and staff who have done this for decades. Keeping people in line is very important to the royal family and they do it well. Look at this thread and the many other threads on Meghan Markle. You have people here buying all of the leaks and tabloid rumors hook line and sinker, as if they are personally privy to all the goings on.

This is so reminiscent of what they did to Diana. I remember being a teenager in the 80s and reading week after week after week about how crazy, difficult, and controlling Diana was. People have forgotten how Diana was bashed for not being able to get along with Tiggy and the boys’ many nannies. They are using the exact same smear campaign against Meghan, complete with allegations she can’t get along with the help.

Agree, but there is more going on with Meghan - she isn't openly rebelling or crying out for help - from all indications, she and Harry are very happy. I wonder if the Palace "leakers" (if there is any actual fact to what they spread) are also using the racism against Meghan as a way to rile up anti-Meghan animus. Racism allows it to spread further.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

MM could rewear an outfit, especially a coat, every now and then, you know. High street fashion (mass market brands from a store like Macy's) don't cost a fortune and would have been more appropriate in this instance. It doesn't take a lot of money to dress well, look nice and know your audience.

I repeat, she is tone-deaf. Especially since the British public is critical of her extravagant clothing choices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

MM could rewear an outfit, especially a coat, every now and then, you know. High street fashion (mass market brands from a store like Macy's) don't cost a fortune and would have been more appropriate in this instance. It doesn't take a lot of money to dress well, look nice and know your audience.

I repeat, she is tone-deaf. Especially since the British public is critical of her extravagant clothing choices.

There is literally nothing she could wear that you would not criticize her for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has been following the Royals for more than 30 seconds knows that this is their modus operandi. They leaked a lot of negativity about Diana in order to keep her in line before she learn to play the game and turned on them.

The purpose of these leaks is to remind Meghan not to fly too high or get too big a head. They are going to turn the public against her so that she has to retreat further into the royal family for protection and is thereby under control.

Ah, that makes sense. But Diana was a child when she married Charles. Meghan is a grown woman who knows how to stand up for herself. I think Harry picked her for good reason.

PP here. Even a grown woman is going to have trouble coming up against the Royal machine. They have experts and staff who have done this for decades. Keeping people in line is very important to the royal family and they do it well. Look at this thread and the many other threads on Meghan Markle. You have people here buying all of the leaks and tabloid rumors hook line and sinker, as if they are personally privy to all the goings on.

This is so reminiscent of what they did to Diana. I remember being a teenager in the 80s and reading week after week after week about how crazy, difficult, and controlling Diana was. People have forgotten how Diana was bashed for not being able to get along with Tiggy and the boys’ many nannies. They are using the exact same smear campaign against Meghan, complete with allegations she can’t get along with the help.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has been following the Royals for more than 30 seconds knows that this is their modus operandi. They leaked a lot of negativity about Diana in order to keep her in line before she learn to play the game and turned on them.

The purpose of these leaks is to remind Meghan not to fly too high or get too big a head. They are going to turn the public against her so that she has to retreat further into the royal family for protection and is thereby under control.

Ah, that makes sense. But Diana was a child when she married Charles. Meghan is a grown woman who knows how to stand up for herself. I think Harry picked her for good reason.

PP here. Even a grown woman is going to have trouble coming up against the Royal machine. They have experts and staff who have done this for decades. Keeping people in line is very important to the royal family and they do it well. Look at this thread and the many other threads on Meghan Markle. You have people here buying all of the leaks and tabloid rumors hook line and sinker, as if they are personally privy to all the goings on.

This is so reminiscent of what they did to Diana. I remember being a teenager in the 80s and reading week after week after week about how crazy, difficult, and controlling Diana was. People have forgotten how Diana was bashed for not being able to get along with Tiggy and the boys’ many nannies. They are using the exact same smear campaign against Meghan, complete with allegations she can’t get along with the help.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

MM could rewear an outfit, especially a coat, every now and then, you know. High street fashion (mass market brands from a store like Macy's) don't cost a fortune and would have been more appropriate in this instance. It doesn't take a lot of money to dress well, look nice and know your audience.

I repeat, she is tone-deaf. Especially since the British public is critical of her extravagant clothing choices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious

And if she hadn't dressed nicely you and Will's proxy whisperers in the press would be complaining about how insulting it was that she didn't dress nicely.

Anonymous wrote:So MM's $500,000 extravagant clothing purchases are made up? The resignation of ANOTHER senior aide, this time her top protection officer, are MADE UP?


https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/duchess-meghans-bodyguard-quits-after-less-than-a-year/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, and there is this gem:

https://www.marieclaire.com/fashion/a25841580/meghan-markle-surprise-royal-visit/



Meghan visits her new patronage, SmartWorks, an organization to help unemployed women with interview clothing and skills. Tone-deaf MM shows up wearing an Oscar de la Renta coat and accessories costing nearly $4000.

so obnoxious