Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re a sucker in the sense that your full pay is subsidizing other kids. But at your alleged salary, it’s no big deal, right? In any event, try to adjust your attitude to understanding that there are those less fortunate than you are.
This is such a myth. Full-pay families are not subsidizing other kids because the cost per student is far more than the sticker price. Actually educating a student at an elite college costs $100K+/year. At these schools (the elite ones that don't really offer merit aid), the difference between tuition and the actual cost is paid for by interest from enormously large endowments.
FWIW, I know that we are likely to be full pay parents, but I don't consider ourselves suckers. As one PP noted, I consider ourselves very, very fortunate. In the grand scheme of things, it is really morally appalling and politically unsustainable that there is such a huge difference in wealth between the top 1% and the lower 90%.
Yes, but merit aid goes to the top 1% too. Some of them are great students willing to go to a less great school for a discount. Others are much more run of the mill students, whose parents just demand and get a discount. There was a great article a year or two ago on Franklin and Marshall College cutting off merit aid for these non deserving parents, and redirecting the money into financial aid. It was great for the college.
Because yes, you are a sucker if other rich parents are getting a discount, but you're not.
OP here. Which is why I pointed out that our DS will attend a school that gives out very little merit aid...only to a handful of kids who are just over the top unique achievers. On the other hand, another school he got into gives out lots of merit aid. It was his safety though.
If you truly make 800K$ a year, why do you care? Tuition of 40K is just 5% of your annual income.
Using the same logic, your house should cost X for you and 2X or 3X for someone making much more.
Anonymous wrote:We make over $1M and are full pay too. I just feel a sucker when paying full tuition at the out of state flagship but not at the ivy.
Anonymous wrote:You're not a sucker at all if your financial circumstances permit you to be full pay. We did it for all our kids and don't feel like suckers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re a sucker in the sense that your full pay is subsidizing other kids. But at your alleged salary, it’s no big deal, right? In any event, try to adjust your attitude to understanding that there are those less fortunate than you are.
This is such a myth. Full-pay families are not subsidizing other kids because the cost per student is far more than the sticker price. Actually educating a student at an elite college costs $100K+/year. At these schools (the elite ones that don't really offer merit aid), the difference between tuition and the actual cost is paid for by interest from enormously large endowments.
FWIW, I know that we are likely to be full pay parents, but I don't consider ourselves suckers. As one PP noted, I consider ourselves very, very fortunate. In the grand scheme of things, it is really morally appalling and politically unsustainable that there is such a huge difference in wealth between the top 1% and the lower 90%.
Yes, but merit aid goes to the top 1% too. Some of them are great students willing to go to a less great school for a discount. Others are much more run of the mill students, whose parents just demand and get a discount. There was a great article a year or two ago on Franklin and Marshall College cutting off merit aid for these non deserving parents, and redirecting the money into financial aid. It was great for the college.
Because yes, you are a sucker if other rich parents are getting a discount, but you're not.
OP here. Which is why I pointed out that our DS will attend a school that gives out very little merit aid...only to a handful of kids who are just over the top unique achievers. On the other hand, another school he got into gives out lots of merit aid. It was his safety though.
If you truly make 800K$ a year, why do you care? Tuition of 40K is just 5% of your annual income.
Anonymous wrote:As a full pay parent here, I am 100% o.k (actually, better than ok) with the idea that some of my money is covering financial aid. But I would not be OK if my son's school offered merit aid, which would mean that my tuition dollars would be going to subsidize some upper middle class parents you just don't want to pay the full tuition. That seems like a bad dynamic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re a sucker in the sense that your full pay is subsidizing other kids. But at your alleged salary, it’s no big deal, right? In any event, try to adjust your attitude to understanding that there are those less fortunate than you are.
This is such a myth. Full-pay families are not subsidizing other kids because the cost per student is far more than the sticker price. Actually educating a student at an elite college costs $100K+/year. At these schools (the elite ones that don't really offer merit aid), the difference between tuition and the actual cost is paid for by interest from enormously large endowments.
FWIW, I know that we are likely to be full pay parents, but I don't consider ourselves suckers. As one PP noted, I consider ourselves very, very fortunate. In the grand scheme of things, it is really morally appalling and politically unsustainable that there is such a huge difference in wealth between the top 1% and the lower 90%.
I sincerely doubt the bolded part.
Do you have any idea about professor salary and tenure, and president earnings? You seem very naive.
Let's say a professor make ~$150K/year (generous; it's probably less). A good college has 10 students for every professor.
An elite president make, what, $1M/year? And there's only one of them.
If it costs over $100K/year to educate a student at an elite college, there's something wrong with how they're handling their money. Maybe too many administrators.
You are obviously no economist, accountant, or academic. Colleges also need to pay for classrooms and grounds, utilities, facilities, maintenance and grounds, lab equipment, computers, furnishings, personnel to clean and maintain those grounds, support staff (admissions, HR, deans, health facilities, academic counselors, disability services, etc.). It amazes me when people complain about the cost of education and then also complain that the facilities are sub-par.
When tuition is going up at many times the rate of inflation, I think it's right to question where the money is going.
Education is a luxury good. There's far more demand for seats at elite universities than there is supply. If you don't like it, you can cheap out and send your kid to Nowhere U.
but this is a big part of the problem. and DCUM is never tired of lecturing that one is to supposed to buy an expensive car or a purse (suckers! $30 purse is the same as $3000 one! toyota is the most reliable car!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re a sucker in the sense that your full pay is subsidizing other kids. But at your alleged salary, it’s no big deal, right? In any event, try to adjust your attitude to understanding that there are those less fortunate than you are.
This is such a myth. Full-pay families are not subsidizing other kids because the cost per student is far more than the sticker price. Actually educating a student at an elite college costs $100K+/year. At these schools (the elite ones that don't really offer merit aid), the difference between tuition and the actual cost is paid for by interest from enormously large endowments.
FWIW, I know that we are likely to be full pay parents, but I don't consider ourselves suckers. As one PP noted, I consider ourselves very, very fortunate. In the grand scheme of things, it is really morally appalling and politically unsustainable that there is such a huge difference in wealth between the top 1% and the lower 90%.
I sincerely doubt the bolded part.
Do you have any idea about professor salary and tenure, and president earnings? You seem very naive.
Let's say a professor make ~$150K/year (generous; it's probably less). A good college has 10 students for every professor.
An elite president make, what, $1M/year? And there's only one of them.
If it costs over $100K/year to educate a student at an elite college, there's something wrong with how they're handling their money. Maybe too many administrators.
You are obviously no economist, accountant, or academic. Colleges also need to pay for classrooms and grounds, utilities, facilities, maintenance and grounds, lab equipment, computers, furnishings, personnel to clean and maintain those grounds, support staff (admissions, HR, deans, health facilities, academic counselors, disability services, etc.). It amazes me when people complain about the cost of education and then also complain that the facilities are sub-par.
When tuition is going up at many times the rate of inflation, I think it's right to question where the money is going.
Education is a luxury good. There's far more demand for seats at elite universities than there is supply. If you don't like it, you can cheap out and send your kid to Nowhere U.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re a sucker in the sense that your full pay is subsidizing other kids. But at your alleged salary, it’s no big deal, right? In any event, try to adjust your attitude to understanding that there are those less fortunate than you are.
This is such a myth. Full-pay families are not subsidizing other kids because the cost per student is far more than the sticker price. Actually educating a student at an elite college costs $100K+/year. At these schools (the elite ones that don't really offer merit aid), the difference between tuition and the actual cost is paid for by interest from enormously large endowments.
FWIW, I know that we are likely to be full pay parents, but I don't consider ourselves suckers. As one PP noted, I consider ourselves very, very fortunate. In the grand scheme of things, it is really morally appalling and politically unsustainable that there is such a huge difference in wealth between the top 1% and the lower 90%.
I sincerely doubt the bolded part.
Do you have any idea about professor salary and tenure, and president earnings? You seem very naive.
Let's say a professor make ~$150K/year (generous; it's probably less). A good college has 10 students for every professor.
An elite president make, what, $1M/year? And there's only one of them.
If it costs over $100K/year to educate a student at an elite college, there's something wrong with how they're handling their money. Maybe too many administrators.
You are obviously no economist, accountant, or academic. Colleges also need to pay for classrooms and grounds, utilities, facilities, maintenance and grounds, lab equipment, computers, furnishings, personnel to clean and maintain those grounds, support staff (admissions, HR, deans, health facilities, academic counselors, disability services, etc.). It amazes me when people complain about the cost of education and then also complain that the facilities are sub-par.
When tuition is going up at many times the rate of inflation, I think it's right to question where the money is going.