Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

DW said that DD is having a hard time with the adjustment and that spending nights at my house mid week would be disruptive to DD's schedule.

Then it sounds like your focus should be on your daughter's well being and helping her adjust. Is your daughter in any kind of counseling, individual or family?

The more likely scenario is that DW is creating a make believe narrative so support her having full custody. Even if DD is having issues adjusting (any child would), asking for full custody will actually give DD MORE ISSUES adjusting. I can't understand how some mothers don't see this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

DW said that DD is having a hard time with the adjustment and that spending nights at my house mid week would be disruptive to DD's schedule.

Then it sounds like your focus should be on your daughter's well being and helping her adjust. Is your daughter in any kind of counseling, individual or family?

Anonymous wrote:You should interview a bunch of lawyers, ask them what you can do, and ask them what their experience has been with this particular judge. Use it as a double-check on what your lawyer is doing/saying.

People can sit on here and say the decision "doesn't make sense" but the fact is, one judge can do things that make no sense. It may not be the usual, common, or average outcome, but it can still be your outcome if you get an unusual, quirky, non-average judge. Which happens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

DW said that DD is having a hard time with the adjustment and that spending nights at my house mid week would be disruptive to DD's schedule.

Then it sounds like your focus should be on your daughter's well being and helping her adjust. Is your daughter in any kind of counseling, individual or family?

DW is lying. She has told a bunch of lies throughout the process and my lawyer even exposed them in court in front of the judge.

To answer your question though yes DD is in individual counseling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Splitting weekends makes sense, the question is why the limited schedule during the week. Where do you live relative to them? If you’re a distance from your chuld’s school, friends, activities, etc., the judge may have felt that her being with mom and most of the time would be least disruptive because it would let your daughter have stability in the rest of her life.

I live 5 mins away from old house.

DW moved 10 mins away from old house and out of DD's school district.

It is my address keeping child in same district thereby allowing her to remain at same school with her same friends and activities.

Won’t your school residency rules require that she must use the same address where she lives at least 50% of the time, which means she’d have to spend more nights at your house to keep staying at the same school- use that argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

DW said that DD is having a hard time with the adjustment and that spending nights at my house mid week would be disruptive to DD's schedule.

Then it sounds like your focus should be on your daughter's well being and helping her adjust. Is your daughter in any kind of counseling, individual or family?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Splitting weekends makes sense, the question is why the limited schedule during the week. Where do you live relative to them? If you’re a distance from your chuld’s school, friends, activities, etc., the judge may have felt that her being with mom and most of the time would be least disruptive because it would let your daughter have stability in the rest of her life.

I live 5 mins away from old house.

DW moved 10 mins away from old house and out of DD's school district.

It is my address keeping child in same district thereby allowing her to remain at same school with her same friends and activities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Splitting weekends makes sense, the question is why the limited schedule during the week. Where do you live relative to them? If you’re a distance from your chuld’s school, friends, activities, etc., the judge may have felt that her being with mom and most of the time would be least disruptive because it would let your daughter have stability in the rest of her life.

I live 5 mins away from old house.

DW moved 10 mins away from old house and out of DD's school district.

It is my address keeping child in same district thereby allowing her to remain at same school with her same friends and activities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

DW said that DD is having a hard time with the adjustment and that spending nights at my house mid week would be disruptive to DD's schedule.

Anonymous wrote:OP, your ex must have submitted a brief in support of those requests, what were her arguments in favor of the visitation arrangement?

Anonymous wrote:Splitting weekends makes sense, the question is why the limited schedule during the week. Where do you live relative to them? If you’re a distance from your chuld’s school, friends, activities, etc., the judge may have felt that her being with mom and most of the time would be least disruptive because it would let your daughter have stability in the rest of her life.