Anonymous wrote:https://apnews.com/0a1274f987fa45c598dbdad9c6f0fb4a
Here is a reason for the score drop in one (very white) state, Nebraska.
The linked article states that Nebraska was anticipating scores to drop this year because it was the first year it required the ACT be taken by all students in the class. In prior years the ACT was completely voluntary.
The article also states that 17 states required all students to take the ACT this year.
Those states are all states with low asian populations:
Alabama
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
North Carolina
North Dakota
Utah
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Plus:
Ohio
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
(Require ACT or SAT)
I could not find the 17th state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Immigration
2. Economy, middle wages are basically flat for over 20yrs
3. Broken homes / no father figures
4. Pissing away life addicted to video games
5. Travel sports obsession takes priority over academics
How is immigration making white, black, and Latinos do worse on tests?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would cull out the kids that test prep and run the numbers.
Are you suggesting kids should not prepare for the ACT or SAT now?
C'mon. I know one kid who took the SAT 7 times until they got the score the parents deemed acceptable.
And your point is?? If a runner runs the same course 100s of times to improve 0.1 sec, is that a bad thing? Oh, btw, for the sake of argument, let’s say the runner is not an Asian.
Again, if you work this hard to reduce your running time and you're Asian, it can only mean your Tiger Parent is forcing you to be successful. However, if you you're not Asian, I believe this is called Perseverance and is consider a good trait.
Um, no. Bad analogy. These tests were designed to be taken once. When most people take it once, and a segment of test takers turns it into a conditioning sport, it warps the results and renders the test far less useful for admissions officers.
What are you talking about??
Most people take the SATs and ACTs more than once. Very very few take them only once.
Even at my backwards, redneck, trailer park, no one leaves the state high school in the 80s, people would take the ACT at least twice, sometimes more.
Do you have any data because I’m the only person I know from my rural HS that took it twice
Nobody at our high school took it twice and most didn't take the PSAT either.
I don’t know of any schools where the psat isn’t mandatory. Where did you go to school?
Anonymous wrote:One can opt out our HS by saying they plan to sit for the ACT
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. Immigration
2. Economy, middle wages are basically flat for over 20yrs
3. Broken homes / no father figures
4. Pissing away life addicted to video games
5. Travel sports obsession takes priority over academics
How is immigration making white, black, and Latinos do worse on tests?
Anonymous wrote:1. Immigration
2. Economy, middle wages are basically flat for over 20yrs
3. Broken homes / no father figures
4. Pissing away life addicted to video games
5. Travel sports obsession takes priority over academics
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would cull out the kids that test prep and run the numbers.
Are you suggesting kids should not prepare for the ACT or SAT now?
C'mon. I know one kid who took the SAT 7 times until they got the score the parents deemed acceptable.
And your point is?? If a runner runs the same course 100s of times to improve 0.1 sec, is that a bad thing? Oh, btw, for the sake of argument, let’s say the runner is not an Asian.
Again, if you work this hard to reduce your running time and you're Asian, it can only mean your Tiger Parent is forcing you to be successful. However, if you you're not Asian, I believe this is called Perseverance and is consider a good trait.
Um, no. Bad analogy. These tests were designed to be taken once. When most people take it once, and a segment of test takers turns it into a conditioning sport, it warps the results and renders the test far less useful for admissions officers.
What are you talking about??
Most people take the SATs and ACTs more than once. Very very few take them only once.
Even at my backwards, redneck, trailer park, no one leaves the state high school in the 80s, people would take the ACT at least twice, sometimes more.
Do you have any data because I’m the only person I know from my rural HS that took it twice
Nobody at our high school took it twice and most didn't take the PSAT either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would cull out the kids that test prep and run the numbers.
Are you suggesting kids should not prepare for the ACT or SAT now?
C'mon. I know one kid who took the SAT 7 times until they got the score the parents deemed acceptable.
And your point is?? If a runner runs the same course 100s of times to improve 0.1 sec, is that a bad thing? Oh, btw, for the sake of argument, let’s say the runner is not an Asian.
Again, if you work this hard to reduce your running time and you're Asian, it can only mean your Tiger Parent is forcing you to be successful. However, if you you're not Asian, I believe this is called Perseverance and is consider a good trait.
Um, no. Bad analogy. These tests were designed to be taken once. When most people take it once, and a segment of test takers turns it into a conditioning sport, it warps the results and renders the test far less useful for admissions officers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would cull out the kids that test prep and run the numbers.
Are you suggesting kids should not prepare for the ACT or SAT now?
C'mon. I know one kid who took the SAT 7 times until they got the score the parents deemed acceptable.
And your point is?? If a runner runs the same course 100s of times to improve 0.1 sec, is that a bad thing? Oh, btw, for the sake of argument, let’s say the runner is not an Asian.
Again, if you work this hard to reduce your running time and you're Asian, it can only mean your Tiger Parent is forcing you to be successful. However, if you you're not Asian, I believe this is called Perseverance and is consider a good trait.
Um, no. Bad analogy. These tests were designed to be taken once. When most people take it once, and a segment of test takers turns it into a conditioning sport, it warps the results and renders the test far less useful for admissions officers.
What are you talking about??
Most people take the SATs and ACTs more than once. Very very few take them only once.
Even at my backwards, redneck, trailer park, no one leaves the state high school in the 80s, people would take the ACT at least twice, sometimes more.
Do you have any data because I’m the only person I know from my rural HS that took it twice
Nobody at our high school took it twice and most didn't take the PSAT either.