Anonymous
10/10/2018 17:51
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/brian-kemp-is-blocking-53k-applicants-from-registering-to-vote-most-of-them-black
This will cost Abrams the Governorship.
The only way the GOP can win is to cheat.
“Kemp’s office has cancelled over 1.4m voter registrations since 2012. Nearly 670k registrations were cancelled in 2017 alone... Georgia's population is approximately 32% black, but the voter registrations on hold with Kemp’s office are nearly 70% black."
https://www.wabe.org/voting-rights-become-a-flashpoint-in-georgia-governors-race/
I was just coming here to post this. This is disgusting. Look, GOP voters. Look at this. Look at how you have to cheat to win. Look at how you have to screw over black people to do it. If you want to know why so many liberals call you racists, here is but one more reason why.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 16:37
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/brian-kemp-is-blocking-53k-applicants-from-registering-to-vote-most-of-them-black
This will cost Abrams the Governorship.
The only way the GOP can win is to cheat.
“Kemp’s office has cancelled over 1.4m voter registrations since 2012. Nearly 670k registrations were cancelled in 2017 alone... Georgia's population is approximately 32% black, but the voter registrations on hold with Kemp’s office are nearly 70% black."
https://www.wabe.org/voting-rights-become-a-flashpoint-in-georgia-governors-race/
Anonymous
10/10/2018 16:30
Subject: Voter suppression
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/brian-kemp-is-blocking-53k-applicants-from-registering-to-vote-most-of-them-black
This will cost Abrams the Governorship.
The only way the GOP can win is to cheat.
This will cost Abrams the Governorship.
The only way the GOP can win is to cheat.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 08:33
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
You really should watch Carol Anderson explain that you’re not correct. Conveniently, the interview is post #1 of this thread.
As Ms. Anderson states, an analysis done by a law professor of one billion votes found only 31 were fraudulent. Out of a BILLION.
A billion votes?
That's pretty good turnout in a country with a total population of 325,000,000.
So, there are these things called elections, and more than one have happened in the past. So if I analyze say, ten elections, because I am being thorough, I could analyze a billion votes. You’re welcome.
+1
Good grief.
In a year in this country there might be how many primaries, local elections, special elections and regular elections.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 07:23
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
You really should watch Carol Anderson explain that you’re not correct. Conveniently, the interview is post #1 of this thread.
As Ms. Anderson states, an analysis done by a law professor of one billion votes found only 31 were fraudulent. Out of a BILLION.
A billion votes?
That's pretty good turnout in a country with a total population of 325,000,000.
So, there are these things called elections, and more than one have happened in the past. So if I analyze say, ten elections, because I am being thorough, I could analyze a billion votes. You’re welcome.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 07:14
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
You really should watch Carol Anderson explain that you’re not correct. Conveniently, the interview is post #1 of this thread.
As Ms. Anderson states, an analysis done by a law professor of one billion votes found only 31 were fraudulent. Out of a BILLION.
A billion votes?
That's pretty good turnout in a country with a total population of 325,000,000.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 07:13
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why aren't these same people complaining about all the other things in ordinary life that require presenting ID?
How come no one is protesting showing ID to buy alcohol or cigarettes? Or prescription meds? Or to receive govt benefits?
How is it the *only* thing people get outraged about having to show ID for, is *voting*? Being required to show ID for all the other stuff is fine with them.
It really is a magical contradiction, isn't it?
I have never shown ID when getting Rx meds. I pick up my husband’s all the time.
Exactly what kind of meds? Aspirin.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 06:58
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Why aren't these same people complaining about all the other things in ordinary life that require presenting ID?
How come no one is protesting showing ID to buy alcohol or cigarettes? Or prescription meds? Or to receive govt benefits?
How is it the *only* thing people get outraged about having to show ID for, is *voting*? Being required to show ID for all the other stuff is fine with them.
It really is a magical contradiction, isn't it?
I have never shown ID when getting Rx meds. I pick up my husband’s all the time.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 06:50
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
You really should watch Carol Anderson explain that you’re not correct. Conveniently, the interview is post #1 of this thread.
As Ms. Anderson states, an analysis done by a law professor of one billion votes found only 31 were fraudulent. Out of a BILLION.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 06:32
Subject: Voter suppression
The difference is, California has identified a problem and has recourse to do something about it. They will determine if any of those people voted and if their votes may have impacted an election (I doubt they voted and I doubt any election was close enough to have been impacted) - but that doesn't negate illegally throwing hundreds of thousands of people off of registration lists in Ohio, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 06:26
Subject: Re:Voter suppression
And, then, we have huge voter registration issues in California......
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/unclear-if-noncitizens-voted-in-primary-californias-top-election-official-says
It's unclear whether the roughly 1,500 people mistakenly registered to vote by the Department of Motor Vehicles cast ballots in California's June primary, the state's top elections official said Tuesday.
Secretary of State Alex Padilla said his office is investigating the registration error and working with counties to make sure ineligible people don't vote in the upcoming election Nov. 6, as early voting began this week.
"I remain deeply frustrated and disappointed that persistent errors by the DMV and CDT [California Department of Technology] have undermined public confidence," Padilla wrote in a letter calling for an audit, according to San Diego’s KNSD-TV.
The DMV said the mistakes occurred because of a processing error that affected people who are not legal U.S. citizens, Fresno’s FOX 26 reported.
California held its primary election June 6, while the incorrect registrations happened between April 23 and Sept. 25, according to the DMV.
“These mistakes from the DMV are absolutely unacceptable,” Padilla said. "My concern is it risks jeopardizing confidence in the electoral process."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/unclear-if-noncitizens-voted-in-primary-californias-top-election-official-says
Anonymous
10/10/2018 06:20
Subject: Voter suppression
Voting is the one ting that should be easy to do with the lowest barriers possible. If there was a way to do direct online voting without ensuring voter fraud (there isn't) then it should be dine.
Barring that, there should be early voting, a national day off from work and polling stations walking distance from everyone in urban areas and at least mass transit accessible in rural areas.
Rural residents who use PO boxes ought to be able to vote.
If you are an illegal resident then obviously you are not a citizen and should not be able to vote.
It really shoudn't be that hard yet, here we are with hundreds of thousands if not millions of potential voters being illegally removed from voter rolls, and barriers to vote being erected at every turn.
Barring that, there should be early voting, a national day off from work and polling stations walking distance from everyone in urban areas and at least mass transit accessible in rural areas.
Rural residents who use PO boxes ought to be able to vote.
If you are an illegal resident then obviously you are not a citizen and should not be able to vote.
It really shoudn't be that hard yet, here we are with hundreds of thousands if not millions of potential voters being illegally removed from voter rolls, and barriers to vote being erected at every turn.
Anonymous
10/10/2018 03:08
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Why aren't these same people complaining about all the other things in ordinary life that require presenting ID?
How come no one is protesting showing ID to buy alcohol or cigarettes? Or prescription meds? Or to receive govt benefits?
How is it the *only* thing people get outraged about having to show ID for, is *voting*? Being required to show ID for all the other stuff is fine with them.
It really is a magical contradiction, isn't it?
Great post! Need to see my ID to buy smokes, no problem. Need to see my ID to vote? Voter suppression!!
Anonymous
10/09/2018 23:11
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
You really should watch Carol Anderson explain that you’re not correct. Conveniently, the interview is post #1 of this thread.
Anonymous
10/09/2018 23:10
Subject: Voter suppression
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And turnout is high in part because of fraudulent voting.
You can insult me, but that speaks to your character, not mine.
Prove it, sucker.
Here's a hint: you can't prove it exists. Even your wonderboy, Kobach, got his ass handed to him for lying to the courts and making fake accusation.
Hold on, there's a word you have for that: FAKE NEWS.
What is it with you and calling people names?
You're aware you're violating forum rules by calling people names, right?
I think you need a time-out.
NP. Way to self-pwn in an argument. Good lord.