Anonymous wrote:I think the PP was suggesting that VDA is in unique area logistically. Loudoun and FCV are right next to each other. Arlington, Mclean and Wash Spirit are very close geographically too.
Anonymous wrote:They also do the best job at developing players at the younger ages and have been feeding those clubs for years. It looks like things will be different now. They are also able to pull from areas south of Woodbridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VDA is going to lose their best 05/06 players to teams they are beating from clubs on the decline? PWSI/VSA kids are going to leave their home clubs to go play somewhere else in the same league?
I thought logistically, they are in kind of a unique market. Not like McLean, FCV or Loudoun, which are all pretty close relatively.
Anonymous wrote:VDA is going to lose their best 05/06 players to teams they are beating from clubs on the decline? PWSI/VSA kids are going to leave their home clubs to go play somewhere else in the same league?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just by the numbers, it looks like Loudoun isn't doing too well in any of the age groups. Not a statement on Loudoun, which is a good club, just the numbers. Of course, individual player development has absolutely nothing to do with game scores and results, but it's quite amusing to see all the chasing for the teams that win the most games!
In regards to Loudoun you must take into consideration the number of players that left for FCV, and ECNL/Loudoun in the past. I don’t think Loudoun can be judged on their U15/U14 and older age groups but how their 06 and younger will fair. Loudoun lost their best 04’s and older years ago.
McLean’s 06’s demonstrates a possible fall off.
But, both BRYC and McLean were able to keep their older rosters in tact and maintain success but with Arlington having DA and of course Spirit in their general back yard will both clubs be able to retain talent going forward?
VDA pulls from 2 strong clubs and their younger age groups are bearing the fruits of the affiliations already.
Anonymous wrote:ECNL helps with expenses to finals but not playoffs just like DA. I think the point being made is good DA clubs have to travel quite some distance to get a competitive game where ECNL clubs in Maryland and VA can get competition every weekend. That's why the DA is allowing for cross-conference scheduling. The clubs that could not go back to ECNL were worried about the level of play top to bottom. FCV playing Spirit VA 4 times is not good for either club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just by the numbers, it looks like Loudoun isn't doing too well in any of the age groups. Not a statement on Loudoun, which is a good club, just the numbers. Of course, individual player development has absolutely nothing to do with game scores and results, but it's quite amusing to see all the chasing for the teams that win the most games!
In regards to Loudoun you must take into consideration the number of players that left for FCV, and ECNL/Loudoun in the past. I don’t think Loudoun can be judged on their U15/U14 and older age groups but how their 06 and younger will fair. Loudoun lost their best 04’s and older years ago.
McLean’s 06’s demonstrates a possible fall off.
But, both BRYC and McLean were able to keep their older rosters in tact and maintain success but with Arlington having DA and of course Spirit in their general back yard will both clubs be able to retain talent going forward?
VDA pulls from 2 strong clubs and their younger age groups are bearing the fruits of the affiliations already.
Anonymous wrote:PWSI and VSA are not losing players to McLean, FCV, BRYC, RU, etc anymore. They will be the dominant NOVA club in 2 years once their older teams age out (who have lost players every year to the previously mentioned clubs). Their 06's and 05's paint a pretty clear picture. Spirit is full of kids that didn't make VDA from PWSI and VSA. Dark days ahead for the DA. Driving 300 miles or having to fly to get a decent game is going to get old quick.