Anonymous wrote:I went to an all girls’ high school. When I was 16 they had an eating disorder specialist talk to us at an assembly. She said “you should be 100 lbs at 5 ft and 5 lbs for each additional inch”. I played a lot of sports at the time and was probably my most fit. I was / am 5’ 2” and was 115 at the time. It was the first time in my life I felt sad / bad about my body size which I thought was ironic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'1 and 126 and in no way fat or even chubby. This is a dumb question that can't even be considered without knowing more about your build, fitness level, measurements, clothing size. And even then, a "chubby" person can be more attractive than a thin one depending on the eye of the beholder.
You are overweight.
Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'1 and 126 and in no way fat or even chubby. This is a dumb question that can't even be considered without knowing more about your build, fitness level, measurements, clothing size. And even then, a "chubby" person can be more attractive than a thin one depending on the eye of the beholder.
Anonymous wrote:I am 5'6", and 125, and I am definitely not thin. So, I would think it's chubby. Definitely not fat.
If you think you're "definitely not thin" at 5'6" and 125, then you've got some body dysmorphia going on. Either that or you have zero muscle.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to an all girls’ high school. When I was 16 they had an eating disorder specialist talk to us at an assembly. She said “you should be 100 lbs at 5 ft and 5 lbs for each additional inch”. I played a lot of sports at the time and was probably my most fit. I was / am 5’ 2” and was 115 at the time. It was the first time in my life I felt sad / bad about my body size which I thought was ironic.
This is an interesting point. Do you agree that with each additional inch, a person can add 5 pounds?