Anonymous wrote:OP here: I’m not upset that she’s staying at the house. Like I said, it’s her house. They have no intention of selling anytime soon, I understand all that. What bothered me was that he didn’t think to tell his partner of 2 years that his ex-wife would be sleeping in his house for three nights. To me that’s a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:OP here: I’m not upset that she’s staying at the house. Like I said, it’s her house. They have no intention of selling anytime soon, I understand all that. What bothered me was that he didn’t think to tell his partner of 2 years that his ex-wife would be sleeping in his house for three nights. To me that’s a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not so much she’s staying with her ex, she’s staying with her kid. I don’t think you’re mature enough for this relationship, OP.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't like it but I would be easy about creating drama here because a GOOD man may not choose you and drama over a good relationship with his child's mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the house still in both their names two years after the divorce?
This. This is bad news.
$800,000 house with co-owners. To solo-title it one would have to buy out the other. Or both agree to sell - but with kids in the same school district you can't afford either option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the house still in both their names two years after the divorce?
This. This is bad news.