Anonymous wrote:So we've established that Candace Owens IS in fact a racist and antisemite.

Thank you. No further questions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The tweets she made were indeed racist, and her account was suspended for them. Just because she's African American doesn't make it ok to say those things. It's wrong for any person of any race to tweet things like that. No one should get a pass.

Except all she did was retweet what the new NYT editorial member tweeted--she just substituted a different racial group for "white."

And, let's remember, Candace Owens is African American.

It just goes to show the double standard applied on this.

Anonymous wrote:This is a new low for you Jeff, to see the kind of stuff you find funny.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

I find it disengenuos that anyone active on social media was not aware of her (Jeong’s) vile and racist tweets.

But true to form since it was a minority member posting them it’s obviously quite all right and in fact demanding of protection.

Shame on you, rather than fact check you went straight to defending her and her hate.

To be honest, I still haven't seen a tweet that in context was hateful. I think you need to consider your own reaction and maybe the thickness (or lack thereof) your skin.

This does not support your allegation that "She had years of anti-white tweets". For that matter, it doesn't say that "they were mostly offensive and hate-filled". I'll give you one more chance to support your allegation.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

Wow. I couldn't stomach going through that entire batch, but the sheer volume of her tweets tell me there's more than merely satire going on. Someone who is just "poking fun" does not go on that extensive a rampage, and keep it up for that length of time.

And fine. Freedom of speech and all that. But she should not be on the editorial staff of (one of) the country's most prominent newspapers.

Actually most of those are clearly satirical. Some are very funny, I loved her tweetstorm about an app to help white people cook rice.

Clearly the problem here is that many of you have no sense of humor.

Anonymous wrote:

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

I find it disengenuos that anyone active on social media was not aware of her (Jeong’s) vile and racist tweets.

But true to form since it was a minority member posting them it’s obviously quite all right and in fact demanding of protection.

Shame on you, rather than fact check you went straight to defending her and her hate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

Wow. I couldn't stomach going through that entire batch, but the sheer volume of her tweets tell me there's more than merely satire going on. Someone who is just "poking fun" does not go on that extensive a rampage, and keep it up for that length of time.

And fine. Freedom of speech and all that. But she should not be on the editorial staff of (one of) the country's most prominent newspapers.

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled.

Yeah, I’m going to need some facts to back that up.

Google is your friend. She had years of anti-white tweets. However, some say that is not racism because whites are "in power." I disagree.

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

from Slate:
The core of the Times’ defense of Jeong is that she “responded to … harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers.” In the most obvious reading of the statement, this is simply untrue. If Jeong had been imitating the rhetoric of her harassers, we would expect most instances of it to come in direct response to trolls. But in reality, she took aim at “white people” in standalone tweets on a wide range of subjects, from food to television.


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/08/sarah-jeong-shouldnt-be-fired-for-her-tweets-that-doesnt-mean-liberals-have-to-defend-them.html

There's more from other non conservative websites, too.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled.

Yeah, I’m going to need some facts to back that up.

Google is your friend. She had years of anti-white tweets. However, some say that is not racism because whites are "in power." I disagree.

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled.

Yeah, I’m going to need some facts to back that up.

Google is your friend. She had years of anti-white tweets. However, some say that is not racism because whites are "in power." I disagree.