Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club play at the tournaments can be hard to watch. Basically a pickup game with ballhogs and their parents making it ugly lacrosse. Contrast that with high school team play. Watching any WCAC or IAC game is so much more enjoyable and revealing about a players lax iq, team play and overall talent.
This. It's just that college coaches can't get to high schools games - this is why the NHS fall/summer tournaments are popular as well as club teams - as mentioned previously - they do play a role in the recruiting process even after the rule change.
College coaches are adept at using something called film. They are routinely asking schools in the IAC, WCAC and MIAA to send them film of the spring high school games. Nowadays anytime a kid plays in a high school game, it is possible that many college coaches are watching, or will be the following day in their office. The summer circuit is less meaningful now for sure, but these coaches still do go to summer tournaments to show the flag and see their buddies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club play at the tournaments can be hard to watch. Basically a pickup game with ballhogs and their parents making it ugly lacrosse. Contrast that with high school team play. Watching any WCAC or IAC game is so much more enjoyable and revealing about a players lax iq, team play and overall talent.
This. It's just that college coaches can't get to high schools games - this is why the NHS fall/summer tournaments are popular as well as club teams - as mentioned previously - they do play a role in the recruiting process even after the rule change.
College coaches are adept at using something called film. They are routinely asking schools in the IAC, WCAC and MIAA to send them film of the spring high school games. Nowadays anytime a kid plays in a high school game, it is possible that many college coaches are watching, or will be the following day in their office. The summer circuit is less meaningful now for sure, but these coaches still do go to summer tournaments to show the flag and see their buddies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club play at the tournaments can be hard to watch. Basically a pickup game with ballhogs and their parents making it ugly lacrosse. Contrast that with high school team play. Watching any WCAC or IAC game is so much more enjoyable and revealing about a players lax iq, team play and overall talent.
This. It's just that college coaches can't get to high schools games - this is why the NHS fall/summer tournaments are popular as well as club teams - as mentioned previously - they do play a role in the recruiting process even after the rule change.
Anonymous wrote:Club play at the tournaments can be hard to watch. Basically a pickup game with ballhogs and their parents making it ugly lacrosse. Contrast that with high school team play. Watching any WCAC or IAC game is so much more enjoyable and revealing about a players lax iq, team play and overall talent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
If your son is on Madlax's top team (or any equivalent club team to Madlax's top team) and a starter at a good high school lacrosse program--like Landon, Prep, Gonzaga--the odds are very high that he is going to be recruited by a number of D1 schools.
You don't actually need the and a starter at a good HS team... there are plenty of kids on terrible HS teams that play for Madlax's (or equivalent) top team and play D1.
I do not think the poster was saying that a kid had to check those two boxes, but rather, was saying if they are both checked then odds are very high that the player is recruited at D1. In any event, there are many college caches who put a premium on a quality high school program. Those programs teach the game, and the players are "tactically" more advanced than others who do not have the benefit of a strong high school program. Club ball resembles a pick up game with a few basic defensive schemes, and a lot of one v one dodging on offense by kids who hog the ball and want to shoot at any cost. There is many a club player who is quite an individual player but has a lot of learning to do before he can contribute to a team in the manner that many college coaches want.
Every kid that goes to college has a lot to learn.
You really are putting too much value on a few 1/2 decent games each team gets to play a year.
Good clubs play 20+ high quality games in 6 weeks every summer, HS .. your lucky to get 2-3 quality games. Plus you have play with some scrubs that never made a quality club team.
Club play is light years ahead of even the best lacrosse in the DC schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
If your son is on Madlax's top team (or any equivalent club team to Madlax's top team) and a starter at a good high school lacrosse program--like Landon, Prep, Gonzaga--the odds are very high that he is going to be recruited by a number of D1 schools.
You don't actually need the and a starter at a good HS team... there are plenty of kids on terrible HS teams that play for Madlax's (or equivalent) top team and play D1.
I do not think the poster was saying that a kid had to check those two boxes, but rather, was saying if they are both checked then odds are very high that the player is recruited at D1. In any event, there are many college caches who put a premium on a quality high school program. Those programs teach the game, and the players are "tactically" more advanced than others who do not have the benefit of a strong high school program. Club ball resembles a pick up game with a few basic defensive schemes, and a lot of one v one dodging on offense by kids who hog the ball and want to shoot at any cost. There is many a club player who is quite an individual player but has a lot of learning to do before he can contribute to a team in the manner that many college coaches want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
If your son is on Madlax's top team (or any equivalent club team to Madlax's top team) and a starter at a good high school lacrosse program--like Landon, Prep, Gonzaga--the odds are very high that he is going to be recruited by a number of D1 schools.
You don't actually need the and a starter at a good HS team... there are plenty of kids on terrible HS teams that play for Madlax's (or equivalent) top team and play D1.
I do not think the poster was saying that a kid had to check those two boxes, but rather, was saying if they are both checked then odds are very high that the player is recruited at D1. In any event, there are many college caches who put a premium on a quality high school program. Those programs teach the game, and the players are "tactically" more advanced than others who do not have the benefit of a strong high school program. Club ball resembles a pick up game with a few basic defensive schemes, and a lot of one v one dodging on offense by kids who hog the ball and want to shoot at any cost. There is many a club player who is quite an individual player but has a lot of learning to do before he can contribute to a team in the manner that many college coaches want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
If your son is on Madlax's top team (or any equivalent club team to Madlax's top team) and a starter at a good high school lacrosse program--like Landon, Prep, Gonzaga--the odds are very high that he is going to be recruited by a number of D1 schools.
You don't actually need the and a starter at a good HS team... there are plenty of kids on terrible HS teams that play for Madlax's (or equivalent) top team and play D1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
If your son is on Madlax's top team (or any equivalent club team to Madlax's top team) and a starter at a good high school lacrosse program--like Landon, Prep, Gonzaga--the odds are very high that he is going to be recruited by a number of D1 schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club matters less, and school more now that recruiting has been pushed back to junior year. Agree still need to play for a top club.
What's the logic? Recruiting push back enhances importance of school over club?