Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hmm, when my son played Academy style soccer, the parents were very much like other travel parents. In fact, because the teams were constantly changing, the atmosphere was actually worse, instead of parents jostling to have their kid at the top of the heap at tryouts, it was continuous.
The problem with clubs saying that they are academy style does not necessarily mean they really are. Just having the A and B team practice together does not an academy make. The difference at FCB is multiple age groups and genders are on the fields roughly at the same time. They are broken into groups based on skill and the purpose of the practice. So that means that a kid could regularly practice with a age group one to two years up once a week and then twice a week with his regular group. It is very easy to make sure proper numbers are available for the specific drill by simply moving one or two kids to a different field.
While there are fairly established groups there is enough fluidity that they find ways to challenge all the kids in appropriate manners. There is also no team attachment which leads to a toxic environment due to jealousy or perceived slights. Does that mean some people are not happy? No but many traditional club soccer problems are mitigated minimized as best they can be.
Anonymous wrote:Hmm, when my son played Academy style soccer, the parents were very much like other travel parents. In fact, because the teams were constantly changing, the atmosphere was actually worse, instead of parents jostling to have their kid at the top of the heap at tryouts, it was continuous.
Anonymous wrote:Hmm, when my son played Academy style soccer, the parents were very much like other travel parents. In fact, because the teams were constantly changing, the atmosphere was actually worse, instead of parents jostling to have their kid at the top of the heap at tryouts, it was continuous.
Anonymous wrote:Hmm, when my son played Academy style soccer, the parents were very much like other travel parents. In fact, because the teams were constantly changing, the atmosphere was actually worse, instead of parents jostling to have their kid at the top of the heap at tryouts, it was continuous.
Anonymous wrote:Ranting soccer dad, you need your kid to grow up before you start talking. You really think you can tell a kid's future athletic prowess at U9??? That is what is different about Barca--they develop every player in their program equally and invest the same amount of time. They don't focus on just 10 players at U9 that appear to be the strongest at age 8....and, then, down the road cut them or move them down when more athletically, skilled kids show up. They are in the 'development business'. They aren't in the 'win every irrelevant tournament in the below U13 age bracket business'.
I get it, it's a new concept for youth soccer in the US. It's hard to grasp for some people.
Anonymous wrote:As a soccer fan and parent of a few soccer kids, if kids buy into the Barca style, it will change the way other teams play. Punt and run won't cut it due to a few things. The "true" possession game (not the crap that all coaches preach about) will neutralize any opponent. The facts are that the ball is the fastest object on the field and it never gets tired. In a nut shell, it's playing keep away with the ball and only shooting when the opportunity arises. You'll never really see a Barca being the fastest or strongest, because they don't need to be. Google rondo drills to get a flavor of what this looks like. My kids are older now, but I'd do barca in a heartbeat if I could. Also, don't get hung up on their academy style. Think about it, DA is trying to do what they have always done in Europe. Train large pools of players and the best play in the game.
RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Probably because they do so badly at them. Did you see some of the results in low brackets at the tournaments they played in? Don't want to call out any teams specifically, but some were really bad.
You are completely missing the point. FCB is not interested in brackets and winning tournaments or producing pro players. It’s nice of course but inconsequential to measuring their success. They are following a blueprint that has been successful in dozens of escolas all over the world. They are teaching the Barça style of soccer to the letter as defined by the home office, and teaching a set of values in how they conduct it. That is the formula and it works for them. And, here, the definition of ‘works’ is not winning tournaments but filling seats and following their model. And spreading the Barcelona brand. There are new escolas opening in Ohio, Chicago, many more. It’s not some experiment it is scaling a franchise.
I realize this doesn’t appeal to everyone. For some the current competitive landscape is fine. That’s ok. For others FCB is a welcome change.
I get it, at least to a point.
But if you've paid $3,000 for a full year of training, and then you enter the bottom bracket at Cannon Cup and can't beat a bottom-tier NCSL team ... is it worth it? At this point, we're talking about kids that probably won't make a high school team. Surely there are cheaper options.
RantingSoccerDad wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Probably because they do so badly at them. Did you see some of the results in low brackets at the tournaments they played in? Don't want to call out any teams specifically, but some were really bad.
You are completely missing the point. FCB is not interested in brackets and winning tournaments or producing pro players. It’s nice of course but inconsequential to measuring their success. They are following a blueprint that has been successful in dozens of escolas all over the world. They are teaching the Barça style of soccer to the letter as defined by the home office, and teaching a set of values in how they conduct it. That is the formula and it works for them. And, here, the definition of ‘works’ is not winning tournaments but filling seats and following their model. And spreading the Barcelona brand. There are new escolas opening in Ohio, Chicago, many more. It’s not some experiment it is scaling a franchise.
I realize this doesn’t appeal to everyone. For some the current competitive landscape is fine. That’s ok. For others FCB is a welcome change.
I get it, at least to a point.
But if you've paid $3,000 for a full year of training, and then you enter the bottom bracket at Cannon Cup and can't beat a bottom-tier NCSL team ... is it worth it? At this point, we're talking about kids that probably won't make a high school team. Surely there are cheaper options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, free? We always had to shell out 400 bucks every 2 years.
You mean you’ve had to pay for your uniform?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:so when does the "success" happen?
It’s already happening. Happy parents, happy kids returning for a second year. Over 90% returning. Many more added and some turned away due to not enough space. That is success.
There has also been success on the soccer field which I guess is how you define success. Many teams have won tournaments. Yes, they aren’t in the top tier brackets yet. Many teams have shown rapid development by playing the same external team in friendlies and going from losing badly to competitive to dominating against the same team. Success is in HOW these teams are playing - using the style that is taught in training. That is success as FCB defines it. They expect it will take years for teams to master the concepts and there is a lot of patience. As a parent they have convinced me in this first year to trust the process and be patient too.
The success is in the journey not the destination.
This is what I was wondering, whether they actually said No to anyone willing to pay. We went to one of their open tryouts, our kid is still a baby (in my eyes) so our internal debate is whether the time (distance for us) and money (definitely more expensive than our local club) is worth it at such a young age. But it also makes sense that if you buy into FCB philosophy then the younger the start maybe the easier it becomes to be ingrained in that method/style of play.