Just saw that her husband is only 39.

Anonymous wrote:I just hope she has a good M.D. because the chances of carrying that child full-term, then being born at a healthy weight, w/no birth defects are nil.

And Down Syndrome is a very high possibility at her age.

When the child graduates from High School, she will be 73.
A tad past retirement age.
Yikes.

She looks to be pretty far along. Not sure when the baby is due.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

uhhh...you are aware that 45 is not 54, right?

I'm 2 years younger than Brigette Nielsen and I think she's nuts for a having a baby at her age when she already has adult children. There will be a 34 year age difference between her oldest child and her youngest child. She will be 88 years old when her youngest is 34.

What’s your point? When my dad was 88, I was 39. He was sharp as a tack until he died 2 years later. We had years of quality time together.

You were very lucky to have a dad who was sharp as a tack, and I'm assuming healthy and independent, until he died at the age of 90. Just be aware that there are nursing homes full of elderly people who are a decade or more younger than your father was when he died.

Bridget Nielsen has the good fortune of having 4 healthy, adult children who will very likely be giving her grandchildren soon if they haven't already. She will quite literally be of retirement village age on her next birthday. Why on earth does she need to be pregnant at her age? Doesn't she realize that she very literally looks like a pregnant senior citizen which is just bizarre and will get no less bizarre as she continues to age? What exactly is she trying to prove? What happens if she has some sort of major health setback during labor and delivery? Will it be up to her adult children to take care of the baby while they try to find appropriate care for their mother?

And do realize, that while your dad likely naturally fathered you, Bridgette Nielsen has almost certainly had some sort of heavy duty medical intervention to make this pregnancy happen. She's selfish.

I just hope she has a good M.D. because the chances of carrying that child full-term, then being born at a healthy weight, w/no birth defects are nil.

And Down Syndrome is a very high possibility at her age.

When the child graduates from High School, she will be 73.
A tad past retirement age.
Yikes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

uhhh...you are aware that 45 is not 54, right?

I'm 2 years younger than Brigette Nielsen and I think she's nuts for a having a baby at her age when she already has adult children. There will be a 34 year age difference between her oldest child and her youngest child. She will be 88 years old when her youngest is 34.

What’s your point? When my dad was 88, I was 39. He was sharp as a tack until he died 2 years later. We had years of quality time together.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How selfish to bring a child into the world at that age. ask me how I know as I’m 32 and my mother is 78 and on her way out due to dementia. I have 3 older brothers none of whom relate to me and god help me when I’m ready to have my first child. I keep my fingers crossed that she will still be alive. Spoken from experience. It’s not cute. She’s doing this for her own ego.

Would you rather not have been born? If you want your mother to be alive when you have children, have a child.

Not everyone feels good about being born. To live is to suffer.

and yet very few kill themselves.

If the child is SN, she's done for. It would be too much for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How selfish to bring a child into the world at that age. ask me how I know as I’m 32 and my mother is 78 and on her way out due to dementia. I have 3 older brothers none of whom relate to me and god help me when I’m ready to have my first child. I keep my fingers crossed that she will still be alive. Spoken from experience. It’s not cute. She’s doing this for her own ego.

Would you rather not have been born? If you want your mother to be alive when you have children, have a child.

Not everyone feels good about being born. To live is to suffer.

Anonymous wrote:How selfish to bring a child into the world at that age. ask me how I know as I’m 32 and my mother is 78 and on her way out due to dementia. I have 3 older brothers none of whom relate to me and god help me when I’m ready to have my first child. I keep my fingers crossed that she will still be alive. Spoken from experience. It’s not cute. She’s doing this for her own ego.

Would you rather not have been born? If you want your mother to be alive when you have children, have a child.

How selfish to bring a child into the world at that age. ask me how I know as I’m 32 and my mother is 78 and on her way out due to dementia. I have 3 older brothers none of whom relate to me and god help me when I’m ready to have my first child. I keep my fingers crossed that she will still be alive. Spoken from experience. It’s not cute. She’s doing this for her own ego.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

Wow thats old. You could be their grandma. Obviously these weren't spontaneous pregnancies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

uhhh...you are aware that 45 is not 54, right?

I'm 2 years younger than Brigette Nielsen and I think she's nuts for a having a baby at her age when she already has adult children. There will be a 34 year age difference between her oldest child and her youngest child. She will be 88 years old when her youngest is 34.

I thought she was a He.

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Who cares?

insecure much?

I had no idea who she was so I looked her up. She looks gorgeous so it is probably good she is bringing another beautiful child into the world. Normally, I'd be grossed out but I'll make an exception for this unusually beautiful woman.