Anonymous wrote:Witnessed 2 clubs with top teams at tryouts already pre-picked. They had a cursory small sided scrimmage and after 10 minutes the top team was called out by the head coach to scrimmage on another field. The coach watching my daughters group totally got side tracked by talking to 1 parent on a break and never went into the coaches huddle to select the top team. Yet magically, top girls were selected for the field he was watching. He never provided input on whom to select from his clipboard and yet girls were selected. It was for show for sure.
At our current club, only 3 outsiders made it to the top team. The B team players all stayed where they are. What is also sad is that the B team girls do not get the same development as the A team girls. The get a worse coach, less tournaments and no video review. They are hardly set up to move up from their current team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of transparency for making top teams is flat unfair to some families. My kid is happy where they are, which is not too team; but we learned a lot this year about the ins and outs of how utterly rigged/preselected players are for every single club's top team. I say it's unfair not because the kids who make it aren't good. It's unfair because they parents know who to speak to and where to be and when in the winter months before tryouts while 90% of parents do not. A very few get lucky; most do not. Anytime who thinks they got lucky most likely just didn't realize they were of the right person's radar at the right time by sheer dumb luck.
Or maybe the majority of players deserved to be there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The coach for our team knocked down several good players for a few kids who tried out from another club even though they didn't necessarily look better in try-outs. Our kid was one who was bumped, and so we left. Disappointing, as it was a nice team and we hadn't anticipated having to leave.
C'mon, you don't honestly believe that tryouts for the big clubs are anything other than charades do you?
The only point to tryouts is to see if any hidden gems turn up.
Coaches know exactly where the returning players will most likely go before tryouts ever begin.
They see the kids all year...how could a few hours of try-outs possibly trump that?
Your kid wasn't bumped because he didn't do as well in tryouts as the other kids. He was bumped because your coach, that knew your kid well, decided he wasn't as good as the incoming kids.
Agreed except in some cases, the returning players are bumped for a kid with a mediocre display at tryouts. I get it if they're bumped for a kid who tries out exceptionally well. Some clubs will bump their own for anything new that walks through the door.
Yes, but again, the coaches see players from other teams during the season, not just players on his own team.
This is correct. In many cases coaches actively recruit players from other clubs and knock loyal players out/down to make room, regardless of skill (unless they are already superstars). It's counterintuitive, but given two players at a similar skill level, it seems that coaches tend to prefer the external player to the internal player; probably a "grass is greener" basis in that the coach has seen all of the negatives of the internal player throughout the year, but has yet to fully see those of the new player.
Which all points back to the question of what is more important to the coach, developing strong players from within for the ling term or winning tomorrow at any cost. And we know that answer to that one in almost all cases in this area.
Nobody develops. They just continue to look for the diamond. They look for new blood every year. Even the Clubs that swear they develop players are guilty of this.
When they drop kids down it is not to develop them there. It's to forget about them while they train their 12 elite players. But--if those guys/gals don't bring home enough Medals--they are searching high and low for that player they think will be the key to their success.
You can't develop kids when you are constantly getting rid of them. And, Clubs love to snag a player from a rival Club.
Anonymous wrote:New to travel soccer and honestly wondering why tryouts for clubs are mid season? Is there a reason for this? It seems like it would make more sense for them to be early June.
Anonymous wrote:The lack of transparency for making top teams is flat unfair to some families. My kid is happy where they are, which is not too team; but we learned a lot this year about the ins and outs of how utterly rigged/preselected players are for every single club's top team. I say it's unfair not because the kids who make it aren't good. It's unfair because they parents know who to speak to and where to be and when in the winter months before tryouts while 90% of parents do not. A very few get lucky; most do not. Anytime who thinks they got lucky most likely just didn't realize they were of the right person's radar at the right time by sheer dumb luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what annoyed me
#1- priority given to new players vs current players-even if those players coming from B teams at other clubs
#2 - head coach did not show up to tryouts even though new to age group and unfamiliar with each player
#3 - randomness of the decisions made (promoting untested players, bumping proven performers)
#4–lack of transparency...appreciate the clubs who share the final roster to avoid drama, share coaching lineup in advance so you know what you are signing up for and don’t try to sweep relevant changes under the rug (roster size, coaching changes, policies, league changes)
The ranking at another Club means shit. Some of those B team players got screwed over at their Club and have A team talent. That’s why they are over at your Club now.
If they are the same quality, but play goalie too or have some other needed talent I get it.
I agree with #2-4 and #1 conditionally as I stated. But, you are just as bad as the Clubs that ask potentially new players for their current team rank—A, B, C at registration and use it to guide where they put them at tryouts or place on their teams. Look at players as if there are no labels. It’s how you are currently playing ultimately and it could be that their Club never gave their players another look and relied on somebody else’s opinion instead of forming their own. The same thing you are complaining about. A lot of great players are lost in the system that way.
This is a good point. Many B team players are leaving their current club because they're actually BETTER than many of their current club's A team players but have been kept on B because of politics or because the B team needs a striker or whatever.
This is definitely the case for many who just left B at our club.
You also have to look at the coaches. Many times they stay with an age group too long and keep their biases about players. Best to mix things up every two years.
Our club switches coaches every two to three years and I never understood why, thanks for the explanation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what annoyed me
#1- priority given to new players vs current players-even if those players coming from B teams at other clubs
#2 - head coach did not show up to tryouts even though new to age group and unfamiliar with each player
#3 - randomness of the decisions made (promoting untested players, bumping proven performers)
#4–lack of transparency...appreciate the clubs who share the final roster to avoid drama, share coaching lineup in advance so you know what you are signing up for and don’t try to sweep relevant changes under the rug (roster size, coaching changes, policies, league changes)
The ranking at another Club means shit. Some of those B team players got screwed over at their Club and have A team talent. That’s why they are over at your Club now.
If they are the same quality, but play goalie too or have some other needed talent I get it.
I agree with #2-4 and #1 conditionally as I stated. But, you are just as bad as the Clubs that ask potentially new players for their current team rank—A, B, C at registration and use it to guide where they put them at tryouts or place on their teams. Look at players as if there are no labels. It’s how you are currently playing ultimately and it could be that their Club never gave their players another look and relied on somebody else’s opinion instead of forming their own. The same thing you are complaining about. A lot of great players are lost in the system that way.
This is a good point. Many B team players are leaving their current club because they're actually BETTER than many of their current club's A team players but have been kept on B because of politics or because the B team needs a striker or whatever.
This is definitely the case for many who just left B at our club.
You also have to look at the coaches. Many times they stay with an age group too long and keep their biases about players. Best to mix things up every two years.
Our club switches coaches every two to three years and I never understood why, thanks for the explanation.