Anonymous wrote:No, sorry. Most hot, successful guys are not going to go for an overweight/unattractive/plain/etc. woman no matter how confident she is. Same with an beautiful, successful woman. She is not going to go for a confident short/overweight/unattractive/etc. guy.
Unless the unattractive confident woman/man is extremely successful or wealthy or famous, it is not the common trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I think "confident woman" I think of Rosie O'Donnell; fat, obnoxious, and too dumb to know how dumb she is.
Are you the “I am that type of girl” poster?
Anonymous wrote:guy here, i don't find women's confidence sexy. quiet women are sexy
Anonymous wrote:When I think "confident woman" I think of Rosie O'Donnell; fat, obnoxious, and too dumb to know how dumb she is.
Anonymous wrote:You women are so insecure.
It’s not the degrees, work experience, thigh gap or fake tan that attrac an a man. Is a sweet ailing woman. That is all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know why you argue against assortative mating as if it is not clearly demonstrated all around us.
What’s clearly demonstrated on this forum and elsewhere is a number of eternally single women who think they should be valued for reasons other than men value women for. Furthermore, the blue collar crack suggests you walk around with the same contempt for women less accomplished than yourself that we saw last week in here. The “ew, nurses only marry deadbeats” thread.
I'm married. I chose my husband, and he chose me in line with the rules of assortative mating. But please do continue to deny reality that contradicts your theories.
I don't have contempt for blue-collar women. I just didn't want to marry one of their men.
You sound like a really disgusting person.