Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Curious pp, why not Danielle?
Of those you are deciding among, definite yes to Jill Ortman Fouse. She will be the only one on the Council who really understands the school board and the PTAs, having served on both. And about 1/2 of our county budget goes to MCPS.
DP. Danielle Meitiv is an ideologue. Ideologues can be good as activists, but the County Council members have to compromise in order to get anything done.
Yes to Jill Ortman-Fouse. And Hans Riemer. And Evan Glass.
Hans had my vote until a few days ago when he started trashing one of the County Exec candidates.
What did he say?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Curious pp, why not Danielle?
Of those you are deciding among, definite yes to Jill Ortman Fouse. She will be the only one on the Council who really understands the school board and the PTAs, having served on both. And about 1/2 of our county budget goes to MCPS.
DP. Danielle Meitiv is an ideologue. Ideologues can be good as activists, but the County Council members have to compromise in order to get anything done.
Yes to Jill Ortman-Fouse. And Hans Riemer. And Evan Glass.
Hans had my vote until a few days ago when he started trashing one of the County Exec candidates.
Lol well I guess my vote cancels yours out since I only voted for Hans BECAUSE he trashed Elrich.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Curious pp, why not Danielle?
Of those you are deciding among, definite yes to Jill Ortman Fouse. She will be the only one on the Council who really understands the school board and the PTAs, having served on both. And about 1/2 of our county budget goes to MCPS.
DP. Danielle Meitiv is an ideologue. Ideologues can be good as activists, but the County Council members have to compromise in order to get anything done.
Yes to Jill Ortman-Fouse. And Hans Riemer. And Evan Glass.
Hans had my vote until a few days ago when he started trashing one of the County Exec candidates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Curious pp, why not Danielle?
Of those you are deciding among, definite yes to Jill Ortman Fouse. She will be the only one on the Council who really understands the school board and the PTAs, having served on both. And about 1/2 of our county budget goes to MCPS.
DP. Danielle Meitiv is an ideologue. Ideologues can be good as activists, but the County Council members have to compromise in order to get anything done.
Yes to Jill Ortman-Fouse. And Hans Riemer. And Evan Glass.
Hans had my vote until a few days ago when he started trashing one of the County Exec candidates.
Anonymous wrote:I like the following people:
Cherri Branson
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Curious pp, why not Danielle?
Of those you are deciding among, definite yes to Jill Ortman Fouse. She will be the only one on the Council who really understands the school board and the PTAs, having served on both. And about 1/2 of our county budget goes to MCPS.
DP. Danielle Meitiv is an ideologue. Ideologues can be good as activists, but the County Council members have to compromise in order to get anything done.
Yes to Jill Ortman-Fouse. And Hans Riemer. And Evan Glass.
Anonymous wrote:I just voted.
Albornoz
Balcombe
Hoan Dang
Evan Glass
I didn't realize that the realtors endorsed them, though. I know two of them from current government work and they are top notch.