Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
The same can be said of my charter who has excellent teachers. The board isn’t great and the admin is bad, but the duty has been amazing. Not sure what you mean by “in your face every day”. I still can’t imagine a single dcps i would even consider.
You’re entitled to your own views, but wow. Not even one? That’s pretty extreme.
+1. That’s really extreme - and a bit strange to me if you are giving charters a chance
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
The same can be said of my charter who has excellent teachers. The board isn’t great and the admin is bad, but the duty has been amazing. Not sure what you mean by “in your face every day”. I still can’t imagine a single dcps i would even consider.
You’re entitled to your own views, but wow. Not even one? That’s pretty extreme.
+1. That’s really extreme - and a bit strange to me if you are giving charters a chance
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
The same can be said of my charter who has excellent teachers. The board isn’t great and the admin is bad, but the duty has been amazing. Not sure what you mean by “in your face every day”. I still can’t imagine a single dcps i would even consider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
The same can be said of my charter who has excellent teachers. The board isn’t great and the admin is bad, but the duty has been amazing. Not sure what you mean by “in your face every day”. I still can’t imagine a single dcps i would even consider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Yes, good school admin/faculty/staff can be a buffer between central and the every day experience. In a charter, the dysfunction is right there in your face every day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
DCPS central can be a crap show sometimes, but our school admin and staff are great. They have a much bigger influence on my kids experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
I think dcps is way more dysfunctional than any of the dci feeders, for example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
DCPS. I went to DCPS. I wish there was a way to consistently get charter administrations to play ball, but unfortunately that’s not how the law is set up. They are accountable to the DCPCSB for financial mismanagement and test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Except with charter's you often end up hitting a brick wall with no where else to go.
Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but no one is more important in advocating for my kid than I am as a parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience as a founding family, parents need to back up at some point and let the admin run the business. If you have a problem in class, that’s another issue.
-Same. It's always nice to be acknowledged and have ways to contribute that are valued--and charters are frankly not always the best with that kind of follow up, but at the end of the day the buck stops with the admin and faculty, and they don't want (nor should they) a bunch of parent back seat drivers. If you want to be that involved, get a job application I would say.
These are all very facile answers when your school hasn't either been subject to a child predator or lost 25% of its teaching staff or has parents leaving in droves due to intense bullying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools like MV that are DCI feeders often have higher retention than they deserve because people who live in areas with bad middle schools will stay just to have a DCI feeder. I think a lot of people don;t have problems with the school until 2nd grade or later and then they feel like they should stick it out for DCI.
I'm curious to see how things change after DCI is no longer a guarantee. I figure after sibling preference, chances of a non-sibling getting into DCI are really not that great after the expansion kicks in. So there's a lot less reason to put up with MV, Stokes EE commute, etc.
I honestly don't think there will be a sibling preference offered for 5th graders interested in going to DCI.
Well they have been clear in saying there will be a sibling preference.
Who is they? This is all academic at this point/
DCI.
It isn't up to them. It will be up to each feeder school to decide how to allocate its seats for DCI -- according to the PCSB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools like MV that are DCI feeders often have higher retention than they deserve because people who live in areas with bad middle schools will stay just to have a DCI feeder. I think a lot of people don;t have problems with the school until 2nd grade or later and then they feel like they should stick it out for DCI.
I'm curious to see how things change after DCI is no longer a guarantee. I figure after sibling preference, chances of a non-sibling getting into DCI are really not that great after the expansion kicks in. So there's a lot less reason to put up with MV, Stokes EE commute, etc.
I honestly don't think there will be a sibling preference offered for 5th graders interested in going to DCI.
Well they have been clear in saying there will be a sibling preference.
Who is they? This is all academic at this point/
DCI.