Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?

Fox is playing a segment called "Dogs with Jobs." Seriously.

Which is a better distraction from Fox's complete lack of ethics - "sex obsessed pandas" or "dogs with jobs"?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.

And, you know this how?

He has three clients. Three.

So?

Two of those clients (Trump-Dennison and Broidy) primary business with Cohen was silencing their previous mistresses. It's not a far stretch to assume the 3rd client (Hannity) was employing Cohen for the same purposes.

And, of course, Hannity has talked about Cohen and interviewed Cohen on his show MANY MANY times without revealing the conflict of interest. Hannity lied to his audience.

Anonymous wrote:Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?

Fox is playing a segment called "Dogs with Jobs." Seriously.

OMG THIS IS THE BEST

By filing this motion about privileged information, they had to know the judge would ask for the names of the clients. That’s the whole point of claiming the privilege.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.

And, you know this how?

He has three clients. Three.

So?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.

And, you know this how?

He has three clients. Three.

Cohen’s lawyers are worse than Cohen as a lawyer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.

And, you know this how?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

Unless you think Hannity wants a business deal in Russia or a taxi medallion, what else would he hire Cohen for?

I bet Wikileaks might have come up once or twice too.

It's all coming together folks.

Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

Unless you think Hannity wants a business deal in Russia or a taxi medallion, what else would he hire Cohen for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.

So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.