Anonymous wrote:I actually think that's normal and something I see in the vast majority of SAHM/ working dad relationships. The mom takes over everything child and house related and the dad just makes money. It is nice that one person is able to make more money and given more time/flexibility to make that money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re not a single parent. You don’t have to worry about earning money + looking after your children. I agree your dh sounds terrible but you are not having to be a single parent.
—SAHM
I had a similar situation as OP and after many years we ended up in family therapy. After about the first couple of sessions, the therapist looked at us and said we had the same dynamics/problems as many single parent households. I still do the vast majority of the chores, but DH now engages with the kids much more. Therapy might help OP but we only got there after repeated crisis with our adolescent tween boys.
Anonymous wrote:Stepped out of the workforce because the two crazy career schedules just wasn’t allowing us to be there for our kids the way we wanted. Fast forward a couple of years and DH has basically decided to disengage from parenting. Weekend activities fall to me - I don’t mind doing it even though I’d like a break but DH is therefore not spending time with the kids or showing interest in their activities. I try to put together some rules for screen time and allowance and want DH input. He basically responds by beings irritated and doesn’t try to be helpful or problem solve. Anyone else encounter this? It’s almost as though he has taken a divide and conquer approach - and in the extreme. I am depressed as a result and thaonk I need to work again to regain an equal footing or to at least have a clear reason why he should parent more. Sometimes he will engage in a parachute in kind of way - not taking the time to really hear what’s going on and the pros and cons of our options or why our child is behaving a certain way. Maybe he just wants an easy solution. I recall being busy at work but I never would have abdicated my role as parent - and certainly would have understood that if I refuse to engage or collaborate that I owe it to my partner trust him to do what he thinks is best.
This is basically a lonely vent, I realize, but welcome helpful thoughts on how to address it in a way that helps us be a happy family.
Anonymous wrote:I have always found it funny/ironic/entitled when the housewives of DCUM complain about equality. Listen, if you have chosen to be dependent on a man, especially once the kids are in school full time, you have zero room to complain. You are in essence a kept woman.
If these kept women that demand equality were faced with their husband says “you know, I’m tired of being the only person bringing in money, I’m going to stop working after lunch, I’m going part time at work. You need to pull the rest of the slack. But I’ll be there for soccer on Tuesday afternoon “.
Sorry babe. Your chosen job is your kids. You are a dependent. Suck it up or work like you have a family to support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No my husband and I look at it the way we would a nanny whom we were paying to come to our house. When he gets home from work, I "clock out" as the default caregiver and we share duties. Why? Because this is what we both expect from a "good" husband and father. He wants to be involved in our children's lives.
Ya'll need to have serious conversations with your husbands.
No this could be different. In your scenario you both work 40 hours in parallel. So her DH is entitled to 80 hrs/wk for work and recuperating from work (b/c 70 hr high stress jobs as the sole breadwinner is a LOT OF STRESS. Way more than balancing a toddlers screen time. ). We decided both of us working was a better dynamic for us, but the sole breadwinner is different unless you have family money or a lot saved up from before you quit or live somewhere cheap so pressure is off breadwinner
I am not quite sure that I understand your scenario. Does a 70 hr/wk high stress job suddenly become less stressful if your spouse is also working?
Yes, because you will not have to work 70 hours a week. If your spouse also works, you can work less because there is additional income to meet the family's needs.
Ok. Who are all of these men who are voluntarily mommy tracking themselves and taking on a significant share of unpaid/unrecognized domestic duties so their wives can return to work? Oh, and are greatful to do it?
I have never seen this in real life.
huh? Working 40-50 hours a week isn't mommy/daddy tracking yourself. It's being realistic with your work about the fact that they're paying you for 40 hours and you have a family. DH is a manager and thinks it's important to show his employees that he takes paternity leave, goes to pediatrician appts and leaves work on time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No my husband and I look at it the way we would a nanny whom we were paying to come to our house. When he gets home from work, I "clock out" as the default caregiver and we share duties. Why? Because this is what we both expect from a "good" husband and father. He wants to be involved in our children's lives.
Ya'll need to have serious conversations with your husbands.
No this could be different. In your scenario you both work 40 hours in parallel. So her DH is entitled to 80 hrs/wk for work and recuperating from work (b/c 70 hr high stress jobs as the sole breadwinner is a LOT OF STRESS. Way more than balancing a toddlers screen time. ). We decided both of us working was a better dynamic for us, but the sole breadwinner is different unless you have family money or a lot saved up from before you quit or live somewhere cheap so pressure is off breadwinner
I am not quite sure that I understand your scenario. Does a 70 hr/wk high stress job suddenly become less stressful if your spouse is also working?
Yes, because you will not have to work 70 hours a week. If your spouse also works, you can work less because there is additional income to meet the family's needs.
Ok. Who are all of these men who are voluntarily mommy tracking themselves and taking on a significant share of unpaid/unrecognized domestic duties so their wives can return to work? Oh, and are greatful to do it?
I have never seen this in real life.
huh? Working 40-50 hours a week isn't mommy/daddy tracking yourself. It's being realistic with your work about the fact that they're paying you for 40 hours and you have a family. DH is a manager and thinks it's important to show his employees that he takes paternity leave, goes to pediatrician appts and leaves work on time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re not a single parent. You don’t have to worry about earning money + looking after your children. I agree your dh sounds terrible but you are not having to be a single parent.
—SAHM
+1. Ignorant and offensive subject line.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a SAHM with a husband that works at least 60 hrs a week and travels some. Sure, sometimes it’s lonely and sometimes I feel taken for granted, BUT DH is super engaged when he is around, to the point that sometimes it causes conflict. I run the show on the home front for the vast majority of time and when he is around, he has input and wants a say! Sometimes it’s easier to fly solo than co-pilot!
That said, I feel you, OP - I know you’re not a single parent, but you want to feel like you’ve got a real partner in this parenting gig. Not much advice other than open communication with your DH.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, let's drop the OPs doltish statement that she is a single parent, and focus on how she learn to appreciate what she does have and maybe work to draw her husband closer to the home. Getting a job is a non-starter. Honestly, taking a class and leaving him with the kids is also passive aggressive nonsense.
Plan activities that firmly draw him into the family, something more fun that watching Larla at soccer.
Is his job stressful and long hours? Maybe talk about moving someplace cheaper so he could downshift his career and have more time at home? Or a shorter commute?