Anonymous wrote:I think you only care about this if you are new to soccer and think winning a trophy is the most important thing. If you are a veteran parent of a talented/ambitious player (or just knowledgeable about soccer and development) you are grateful for every opportunity to play with or against a really good player. Instead of complaining about an "unfair" situation (clearly not actually unfair or poor sportsmanship since it's perfectly within the rules and an accepted practice), you and your kid should be thinking about what makes the guest player so good, and whether it involves training or a way of thinking you can emulate.
Actually playing down in age, which I thought this thread was about from the title, is very different and a serious problem.
Anonymous wrote:I think you only care about this if you are new to soccer and think winning a trophy is the most important thing. If you are a veteran parent of a talented/ambitious player (or just knowledgeable about soccer and development) you are grateful for every opportunity to play with or against a really good player. Instead of complaining about an "unfair" situation (clearly not actually unfair or poor sportsmanship since it's perfectly within the rules and an accepted practice), you and your kid should be thinking about what makes the guest player so good, and whether it involves training or a way of thinking you can emulate.
Actually playing down in age, which I thought this thread was about from the title, is very different and a serious problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.
It amazes me that people want to insulate their kids from competition -- even when the kids at issue are all the same age.
So what are you going to do in HS when your kid is a freshman or sophomore and is trying out for the team against juniors and seniors? Are you going to complain that it isn't fair to have older kids playing against younger kids?
If everyone played in the same bracket, no one would have an issue with this. However, some teams are put into a low bracket because they have weaker players. "A team" players shouldn't play in low brackets. Down one team might be ok, but it should be one of the weaker kids on the higher team, not the best. Or put the best player an age group down on the team.
In HS, they have the exact situation you are talking about; it's called JV
Where does the term nothingburger come from? Just a plain hamburger with no ketchup, mustard, etc?
Yes you are correct OP for those like you with ambitions no higher than JV for your kids you won't have to worry so much about older or better players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.
It amazes me that people want to insulate their kids from competition -- even when the kids at issue are all the same age.
So what are you going to do in HS when your kid is a freshman or sophomore and is trying out for the team against juniors and seniors? Are you going to complain that it isn't fair to have older kids playing against younger kids?
If everyone played in the same bracket, no one would have an issue with this. However, some teams are put into a low bracket because they have weaker players. "A team" players shouldn't play in low brackets. Down one team might be ok, but it should be one of the weaker kids on the higher team, not the best. Or put the best player an age group down on the team.
In HS, they have the exact situation you are talking about; it's called JV
Where does the term nothingburger come from? Just a plain hamburger with no ketchup, mustard, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.
It amazes me that people want to insulate their kids from competition -- even when the kids at issue are all the same age.
So what are you going to do in HS when your kid is a freshman or sophomore and is trying out for the team against juniors and seniors? Are you going to complain that it isn't fair to have older kids playing against younger kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some tournaments - Discovery Cup, for example - don't allow a player to guest play for another team if the team to which s/he is officially rostered is playing in that tournament. So if both the A and B team are playing in a tournament, an A team player can't guest for the B team (or vice versa). I've never seen a rule that explicitly prohibits a "higher" team player from guest playing for a "lower" team. There are almost always rules that limit the number of guest players to 3-5 which I suppose helps prevent the scenario where all or most of a team is displaced by ringers.
Sometimes a sub/bench player from a top team will guest play with the second team to give them more minutes and a leadership role.. That seems like poor sportsmanship IMO, but probably not "illegal." I think the second team player who gets displaced by this guest player is the one who should be most pissed off.I've never heard of a club guest-playing their best player to help a second team win
I guess you've never played FCV. There top players always play on the 2nd team to help them win. I heard they were disqualified from a tournament last year for it.
A team players can play on the B team in tournaments. Only one thing would prevent this:
1. Actually being dual rostered within the tournament when both teams are in the same tournament.
yes. dual rostered. that's what they did. that's why they were disqualified.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.
In addition to all the other explanations that make complete since, it was a TOURNAMENT. Good sportsmanship doesn't require you to not to do this, anymore than it means you must play your reserve players for the exact same time as your starters in order to ensure you don't have some "unfair, unsportmanlike" advantage. The rules allow this, and teams even pick up players outside of their club and add them on as guests. You clearly know nothing about soccer tournaments. This is a nothing Burger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CAN everyone agree now that this was all a nothing burger?!
Yes, if OP wasn't a travel soccer novice he/she never would have posted the OP.
It amazes me that so many people seem perfectly OK with this.
I guess "winning is everything" trumps sportsmanship and development for most of the parents are around here.