Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You said sex has been nonexistent and then you said you’re willing to have sex with him. We may not be getting the correct picture but you haven’t been clear. So you’re not going to get the advice you’re looking for.
Paint a clearer picture of life before the affair and we can give you better feedback.
I feel like this is a pervert Question. Not hard to understand what true poster said. What difference does it make if it was once a month, once every 6 weeks or every 6 months?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
That's not people. It's one incredibly persistent, stunningly unfulfilled and lonely guy. We call him "the Declare Open Marriage guy." He's loud but mostly just really sad.
lol That and uses "sexless" nonstop!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
That's not people. It's one incredibly persistent, stunningly unfulfilled and lonely guy. We call him "the Declare Open Marriage guy." He's loud but mostly just really sad.
Anonymous wrote:
You know you could make your counterpoint without resorting to a childish insult? This is why dialogue on DCUM never works. People refuse to debate the different sides of complicated issues without throwing in random attacks. If you don't agree with my point, that makes a clueless moron. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait. Wait. OP here. If he is so unhappy with the frequency of SEC that he wants to cheat, shouldn’t he mention it first? Like, hey, Sex life is not what i’m Looking for, let’s work on it? TBH, the last couple of times we had sex, he seemed to not to be into it (already cheating, I would guess).
It's a rare man who will throw a bomb into his marriage on purpose. It's a rare man who will seek out confrontation. Most men will find a way to solve things that involves the simplest route. In this case, that's having sex with other people.
Your husband needed sex. He knew talking to you and trying to work it out with you would not suddenly result in sex, so he took the easier path to get what he needed more immediately. He took a risk and decided that X months of peace at home plus sex elsewhere was worth it instead of the combination of no sex at home and hell at home resulting from "talks" about wanting sex.
It's bs. My ex chose smoking and less showering over sex at home. Plenty of men do the same like stopping exercising. Instead of fixing that they go look for whoever accepts them in their new image.
And even bigger b.s. about confrontation. You clearly know nothing about real world marriages
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
Seriously, get out, see how the world works.
Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
Anonymous wrote:It stuns me how DCUM is both filled with attorneys and filled with people who believe that one party violating one provision of a contract frees the other party to do the same or worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait. Wait. OP here. If he is so unhappy with the frequency of SEC that he wants to cheat, shouldn’t he mention it first? Like, hey, Sex life is not what i’m Looking for, let’s work on it? TBH, the last couple of times we had sex, he seemed to not to be into it (already cheating, I would guess).
It's a rare man who will throw a bomb into his marriage on purpose. It's a rare man who will seek out confrontation. Most men will find a way to solve things that involves the simplest route. In this case, that's having sex with other people.
Your husband needed sex. He knew talking to you and trying to work it out with you would not suddenly result in sex, so he took the easier path to get what he needed more immediately. He took a risk and decided that X months of peace at home plus sex elsewhere was worth it instead of the combination of no sex at home and hell at home resulting from "talks" about wanting sex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait. Wait. OP here. If he is so unhappy with the frequency of SEC that he wants to cheat, shouldn’t he mention it first? Like, hey, Sex life is not what i’m Looking for, let’s work on it? TBH, the last couple of times we had sex, he seemed to not to be into it (already cheating, I would guess).
It's a rare man who will throw a bomb into his marriage on purpose. It's a rare man who will seek out confrontation. Most men will find a way to solve things that involves the simplest route. In this case, that's having sex with other people.
Your husband needed sex. He knew talking to you and trying to work it out with you would not suddenly result in sex, so he took the easier path to get what he needed more immediately. He took a risk and decided that X months of peace at home plus sex elsewhere was worth it instead of the combination of no sex at home and hell at home resulting from "talks" about wanting sex.
Anonymous wrote:Your husband is a dick.
Anonymous wrote:Wait. Wait. OP here. If he is so unhappy with the frequency of SEC that he wants to cheat, shouldn’t he mention it first? Like, hey, Sex life is not what i’m Looking for, let’s work on it? TBH, the last couple of times we had sex, he seemed to not to be into it (already cheating, I would guess).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to chime in on open marriage with "emotional boundaries."
It's a myth. Stay in marriage or leave it, decide this as a couple. Pretending he can get some on the side and be completely emotionless is plain stupid.
The marital vow of sexual fidelity is bidirectional. In pledging to have sex ONLY with spouse, there is a commitment to actually have sex WITH your spouse. Both OP and her husband have broken this vow. In neither case was this decided as a couple. Pretending she can stop meeting her side of the vow while expecting him to still meet his is plain stupid. No, 2 wrongs don't make a right. Both are equally wrong. He is not MORE wrong.