Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is MIL's best friend. She's desperate to help her.
Tell your MIL that she should comfort her friend, distract her with invitations to restaurant week or a concert, be a sounding board - anything to get her best friend's mind off the situation. Basically, be a friend.
But this is between your MIL's bestie and her son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.
wow, you sound like a real joy, PP.
NP. Why? Because she doesn't want an 8-year-old to watch her child? Because she doesn't want someone smoking in front of her child? On what planet does that make her anything other than a good mother with reasonable boundaries?
because she equated that behavior with OP's situation, when OP didn't say anything remotely similar to it.
Where did I claim OPs MILs Friend (seriously, 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon much?) was exhibiting behavior similar to my situation? Oh wait, I didn't, because OP herself admitted that SHE HAS NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON BETWEEN THESE PEOPLE! OP doesn't know what behavior caused the rift and still wants to insert herself into this family's issues.
OP, MYOB.
Anonymous wrote:The example you gave of the mom not liking the play doh gift? I'd ask before choosing a gift. What does little Johnny want for his bday?
Agree with another poster that if someone vents to you about the lady in question, you reply with, "huh that hasn't been our experience with Larla. hey, if you don't want her, we'd love to adopt her as *our* baby's second or third grandma!" with a big smile and laugh. Like of course they can't mean the things they are saying.
Otherwise generally you MYOB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.
wow, you sound like a real joy, PP.
NP. Why? Because she doesn't want an 8-year-old to watch her child? Because she doesn't want someone smoking in front of her child? On what planet does that make her anything other than a good mother with reasonable boundaries?
because she equated that behavior with OP's situation, when OP didn't say anything remotely similar to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.
wow, you sound like a real joy, PP.
NP. Why? Because she doesn't want an 8-year-old to watch her child? Because she doesn't want someone smoking in front of her child? On what planet does that make her anything other than a good mother with reasonable boundaries?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.
wow, you sound like a real joy, PP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
Totally agree with you, but either way, it's not likely to change until the DIL agrees to a change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like a situation in my own family, right down to the age of MIL and BFF. Weird and sad.
In my family's situation, there's no fix and no way to help. Any sort of interference would only make an awful situation even worse.
The son has made his choices blatantly clear -- his loyalty lies with his wife. Wife has been difficult (at best) since the earliest days. She's an awful person and the son is equally culpable. People try to avoid saying it, because "he's a nice guy" but there's no excuse for either of them. I tried to keep an open mind for a long time, but eventually realized that was equivalent to condoning their behavior. It's a complex situation and a very sad one for the whole family.
If they've been BFFs for that long, MIL is likely just venting her frustration at seeing her dear friend hurt over and over. There's nothing for you to actually do.
OP here. thank you; you understand. I don't understand people attacking me -- these are not superficial relationships. these people are essentially family, and this rift has caused major problems in what used to be a happy group.
I'm trying to figure out a way to see if we are talking about the same situation, because the similarities are significant. Did MIL's friend just retire?
No, she still works.
Okay, definitely different person. This person just retired last week.
Anyway, I've had a front row seat to this sh!tshow forever. It sucks and my heart breaks for everyone but son and DIL. The only thing I do is provide moral support. Ive fully disconnected from son and DIL, as have several other family members and family friends. I don't think anyone other than son and DIL will ever understand what is really behind all of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some things aren't fixable. Hopefully as the child grows older the mom will loosen the reins and mil's bestie can have more of a relationship, but for now, I agree with pp's that lending a sympathic ear is about the only option.
"The mom" isn't the only one responsible for her child's relationship or lack thereof with the grandmother; her husband is equally responsible, if not more so, as the grandmother is his own mother.
I hate how people always blame the DIL, as if husbands/sons/brothers have zero responsibility.
I totally agree with you that the grandson's father should be facilitating a relationship, but from the story op tells, it's the kid's mom who is actively blocking it, so in that case it's the mom who has to loosen up.
Yeah, well the son can talk to his wife about that, can't he? If he chooses not to, then he is co-signing her degree of rigidity, so he is equally responsible for the lack of facilitation.
+1 DH would love to defer to me and have me be the "Official Family Boundary Enforcer" because it would be easier on him and he could play good cop. It's specifically because of scenarios like this, where all the blame is laid at the feet of the woman while the man gets off without so much as a nasty look that I won't. I force HIM to play the bad cop when his mom wants to smoke around our kid, let an 8 year old cousin babysit, whatever because if I were the one to say No, some jackwang on the internet would be claiming I'm ruining MILs change for "any real relationship" with our DC.