Anonymous wrote:Jesus Mary and Joseph, people, she didn't pose for this cover. Those are all old photos of her, the "article" is a compilation of quotes she's given over the years in interviews and extrapolations as to how she MIGHT be prepping for the wedding. As a PP said, this is all one big nothingburger. She is no more involved in this magazine cover than Kate is when People puts her on the cover.

This is basically every person who will insist on commenting about how tacky this cover is for the next 10 pages of this thread.

Jesus Mary and Joseph, people, she didn't pose for this cover. Those are all old photos of her, the "article" is a compilation of quotes she's given over the years in interviews and extrapolations as to how she MIGHT be prepping for the wedding. As a PP said, this is all one big nothingburger. She is no more involved in this magazine cover than Kate is when People puts her on the cover.

Meghan gets more freedom than Kate just like Harry has more freedom than William. That's just how it goes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

Again with the barely concealed racism? This is so tedious and tacky.

+1.

Black folks: please learn to accept biracial people as, well, biracial people.

I agree with your point about biracial people, but how is that relevant to this post?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

Again with the barely concealed racism? This is so tedious and tacky.

+1.

Black folks: please learn to accept biracial people as, well, biracial people.

Anonymous wrote:Let me summarize your post OP. She’s gorgeous, rich and famous. You’re not.

The end.

Let me summarize your post OP. She’s gorgeous, rich and famous. You’re not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan = the flashy, glamorous side of the Royal family

Kate = the formal, maternal figure of the Royal family

These are their future roles once the current Queen dies. Meghan is going to do the press and public appearance stuff to take the pressure off Kate. Meanwhile, Kate is going to be devoted to ensuring the success of the future Kings (William and George).

Yea, I guess when I see it I think "Kate would never do a cover like that."

Not that Meaghan doesn't look beautiful.

Agreed. Kate would NEVER. Meaghan isn't beautiful under the best of circumstances, but here she looks tacky, if not trashy.

You are truly unbalanced. Of course Kate never would because before William she was a nobody and no one interviewed her to pull quotes years later. She spent 10 years as Waity Katie and that is all she had. How awful for Meghan to have had a career in entertainment where she spoke to the entertainment press as part of her job. She should have known years later she would be marrying into the Firm. How silly of her.

Am I missing something are we still a colony of Great Britain how is this even relevant?

It’s started: She’s going the way of Fergie already.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan = the flashy, glamorous side of the Royal family

Kate = the formal, maternal figure of the Royal family

These are their future roles once the current Queen dies. Meghan is going to do the press and public appearance stuff to take the pressure off Kate. Meanwhile, Kate is going to be devoted to ensuring the success of the future Kings (William and George).

Yea, I guess when I see it I think "Kate would never do a cover like that."

Not that Meaghan doesn't look beautiful.

Agreed. Kate would NEVER. Meaghan isn't beautiful under the best of circumstances, but here she looks tacky, if not trashy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

Again with the barely concealed racism? This is so tedious and tacky.

That’s right, every time someone makes a non-positive comment about Ms. Markle it is because they’re racist, and you are also correct that there is only one other person on DCUM other than you, who makes all the comments that offend you. Very astute, op.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

Again with the barely concealed racism? This is so tedious and tacky.

DP, but I didn't know she was biracial until recently. I thought she was white.

But I’m sure that you knew she was biracial when you posted your racist comment here. Prince Harry is marrying a divorced biracial woman...whether you like it or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is surprising about it?

It is just so Hollywood celebrity and personal.

Not something you think of when you think of ‘royalty.’

She is also not what you think of when you think royalty

Yeah royalty should be inbred pasty descendants of barbaric scheming warriors.

Well she got the scheming part down at least

Anonymous wrote:I don't think anyone called the cover trashy, just not the type of photo you would typically see from the royal family.

I think she looks very pretty.

I thought that they would have to clear this type of photo spread with Meghan and the Palace, even though it took place a while back. It's not a typical paparazzi/press pool photo spread.

Are you stupid? This isn't done with anyone's consent or clearance since it complies old photos and quotes preceding her meeting Harry. Diana was, I think, on more People covers than anyone else. Do you think she participated in any of those ever?