Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, lots of "Mom-work" going on here. But we knew that would be the case and opted for MCPS over privates since I kind of have the time to stay on top of it.
This was not the case when we bought back in 2010. MCPS was like a different school district. Everyone with kids there (I had worked at Lockheed) were super happy. Then in 2013, ppl started looking at privates if their kids were just starting, or rejoicing that their kid was already at Churchill, WJ, or Whitman and getting out in 4-6 years, bypassing Common Core.
There's nothing like people condemning a thing without having any personal experience of it, is there?
DP here.
What are you talking about??
The PP said she has kids in MCPS.
The PP is citing the opinions of people whose children were in private school or in high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's the MS math sequence under 2.0. Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II are weak on symbolic computation. Even something as simple as rationalizing a denominator, is explicitly forbidden by the curriculum even in Algebra II. I guess this is considered too pedantic, but it's the sort of practice that is needed for radicals to become second nature. Instead there is lots of examining graphs and qualitative work. But a qualitative understanding isn't of much use to someone who never develops a muscle memory for computation.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse since I said something similar in another thread, but MCPS math actually doesn't begin until pre-calc. Unfortunately, it's sink or swim at that point, because suddenly all these un-practiced skills are expected to be solid. Which means a lot of material crammed into one year.
Interesting about rationalizing the radical. Will have to ask my kids at the TP magnet. So far, I think we have done pretty well w/ math despite 2.0. I do not get why doing something 3 ways and talking about = greater understanding. Sometimes repetition leads to greater understanding, and they get little of that. I have noticed that many worksheets leave little room to "show your work." I am a big fan of working problems in steps -- that's how you understand them, not by talking about them. But my youngest works an algebra problem condensing 3 steps into 1 w/o showing what she is doing to each side of the equation to keep balance. I think that is the way to understand math.
And, the math on the middle school test (at least up until this year) is completely opposite of what MCPS teaches. If a kid takes time and does thing 5 different ways, they run out of time on the test. (I also have issues w/ that test, & I'm glad they ditched it -- the HS math test made much more sense).
Anyway, I think my kids are well prepared in math b/c they have had amazing teachers (even in HGC, the teacher augmented and add a lot). My kids did have to learn times tables I think to 16 and powers (memorized). And, now in TP magnet, it has been rigorous (though I wish the used more steps to mentally solidify what they are doing to an equation & why -- that's the why, not writing a paragraph)!!!
Anonymous wrote:NP. I have a kindergartener. What should I be doing to supplement now and in the future? Thank you!
OP here. If I had it to do over I would have had them do an outside math program that included testing with actual questions that required getting the right answers not writing a bunch of bull shit about their critical thinking skills pondering the damn question. [/quot
NP with DD in K--does anyone have a Math program either in the MoCo area or online to recommend? I hate math and firmly believe it's because I had an awful teacher for two years in high school who taught both Algebra and Geometry. I want DD to succeed.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's the MS math sequence under 2.0. Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II are weak on symbolic computation. Even something as simple as rationalizing a denominator, is explicitly forbidden by the curriculum even in Algebra II. I guess this is considered too pedantic, but it's the sort of practice that is needed for radicals to become second nature. Instead there is lots of examining graphs and qualitative work. But a qualitative understanding isn't of much use to someone who never develops a muscle memory for computation.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse since I said something similar in another thread, but MCPS math actually doesn't begin until pre-calc. Unfortunately, it's sink or swim at that point, because suddenly all these un-practiced skills are expected to be solid. Which means a lot of material crammed into one year.
Anonymous wrote:OP,
So sorry that you got this rude shock. However, if you have come from overseas you will realize that Math in US is not up to international standards (Europe and Asia) as well.
This is the precise reason that Asian-Americans in this country have become Tiger parents. We are perfectly aware how far behind our GT/magnet kid is as compared to the rest of the world, because we still visit our relatives in Asia every year. We MCPS high achiever child can barely keep up with Asian cousins there who are considered "mediocre students". We know that our children are at the floor of the international achievement gap and we know that when it comes to college admissions and jobs, no distinction will be made between Asian Americans and Asian students.
No child will agree to studying more than what the school requires. Who will want to do a daily hour of Singapore Math, sit for enrichment classes, take tests - if it is not something their peers are doing at school? As parents, it seems that we are not living the easy life that this country affords. Instead, our social and leisure hours are spent in the education of our children because the schools are failing them. This is not even a private vs public school issue. Compared to private schools, MCPS (at least the magnets) are doing a better job in curriculum. And if the curriculum is made rigorous, most Math teachers are also ill qualified to teach Math.
Anonymous wrote:OP,
So sorry that you got this rude shock. However, if you have come from overseas you will realize that Math in US is not up to international standards (Europe and Asia) as well.
This is the precise reason that Asian-Americans in this country have become Tiger parents. We are perfectly aware how far behind our GT/magnet kid is as compared to the rest of the world, because we still visit our relatives in Asia every year. We MCPS high achiever child can barely keep up with Asian cousins there who are considered "mediocre students". We know that our children are at the floor of the international achievement gap and we know that when it comes to college admissions and jobs, no distinction will be made between Asian Americans and Asian students.
No child will agree to studying more than what the school requires. Who will want to do a daily hour of Singapore Math, sit for enrichment classes, take tests - if it is not something their peers are doing at school? As parents, it seems that we are not living the easy life that this country affords. Instead, our social and leisure hours are spent in the education of our children because the schools are failing them. This is not even a private vs public school issue. Compared to private schools, MCPS (at least the magnets) are doing a better job in curriculum. And if the curriculum is made rigorous, most Math teachers are also ill qualified to teach Math.
Anonymous wrote:We used a Whitman math teacher as a tutor at one point. It was the first year 2.0 was being used to teach geometry. He told us that at Whitman the math department chair was rewriting the county lessons. They were not using the mcps provided materials. This was several years ago but just shows you never know what is happening at other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cc2.0 prohoboted child computing with figures and toes. One has to draw. When some yound kids who haven't fully developed their fine motor motion and cannot draw well, they become frustrated and give up. Math is painful.
Uh, Kids count on their fingers naturally. Common core won’t stop that.
Not mine. We spent many hours at home working on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's the MS math sequence under 2.0. Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra II are weak on symbolic computation. Even something as simple as rationalizing a denominator, is explicitly forbidden by the curriculum even in Algebra II. I guess this is considered too pedantic, but it's the sort of practice that is needed for radicals to become second nature. Instead there is lots of examining graphs and qualitative work. But a qualitative understanding isn't of much use to someone who never develops a muscle memory for computation.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse since I said something similar in another thread, but MCPS math actually doesn't begin until pre-calc. Unfortunately, it's sink or swim at that point, because suddenly all these un-practiced skills are expected to be solid. Which means a lot of material crammed into one year.
Interesting. It seems like many of the curricula designed to fit common core standards focus a lot on qualitative work, whereas private schools tend more to be sticking with their historic practices (including more focus on proofs for students in honors tracks). From what you read on these boards, the big problem with math in MCPS right now is that unless you end up in the middle and high school science/math/computer magnets, there isn't much opportunity for more advanced kids. Yes, you can take compacted match in 4th/5th to get on a faster track and take Geometry in 8th (which some privates don't offer), but the actual teaching of math seems weak outside of those programs. Would love to hear from people who have experienced otherwise though...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cc2.0 prohoboted child computing with figures and toes. One has to draw. When some yound kids who haven't fully developed their fine motor motion and cannot draw well, they become frustrated and give up. Math is painful.
Uh, Kids count on their fingers naturally. Common core won’t stop that.
Not mine. We spent many hours at home working on it.
Anonymous wrote:Since both Maryland and Massachusetts adopted common core, there must be something that Massachusetts does better than Maryland. Anybody can say what that is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cc2.0 prohoboted child computing with figures and toes. One has to draw. When some yound kids who haven't fully developed their fine motor motion and cannot draw well, they become frustrated and give up. Math is painful.
Uh, Kids count on their fingers naturally. Common core won’t stop that.