Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is detrimental to professional women because it creates a suspicion of all women of child bearing age, that they aren't worth investing in, will leave an employer in a lurch, etc.
I agree 100%.
It's more detrimental to walk around feeling you're a victim of other people who are minding their own business. Moms at home harming you?
Uh, yes, as indicated above....
+1000. And when they go out on "maternity leave" and never come back; just f*cks it up for those of us that are working to dispel the suspicion of investment in young women. It's one of the most selfish and detrimental things a woman to do the workforce for the other women around them.
Anonymous wrote:In other words, if a man has a SAHM for a wife, does he necessarily have an advantage over his female colleagues?
Anonymous wrote:No. The existence of men who don't do their fair share of domestic work impedes women in the professional sphere.
Anonymous wrote:Having someone at home to take care of kids, laundry, meals, etc is a huge advantage. That this person is usually a mom rather than a dad, grandma, housekeeper, etc dors not mean SAHM's "impede" professional women and the way you phrased that was very trolly.
Most of my staff are women (married and single, moms and not) and everyone more senior than I am is a man with a SAH wife. I do spend a fair amount of time reminding these men that staff are not lazy just because they're not free to stay late or work an unusual schedule.
Anonymous wrote:No. The existence of men who don't do their fair share of domestic work impedes women in the professional sphere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh yup, totally. That's the whole reason we do it.
The question was do men in the workplace having an advantage over women in the workplace? How exactly are you contributing? Who is we in this situation? Think carefully.
Anonymous wrote:Oh yup, totally. That's the whole reason we do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is detrimental to professional women because it creates a suspicion of all women of child bearing age, that they aren't worth investing in, will leave an employer in a lurch, etc.
I agree 100%.
It's more detrimental to walk around feeling you're a victim of other people who are minding their own business. Moms at home harming you?
Uh, yes, as indicated above....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No other professional women impede professional women, mainly those who think their jobs should coddle them because they also have kids.
Choose your field wisely. Don't expect the nature of a job to change because you want to stop everything at 3:30pm to take the kids to piano and soccer.
Very, very few jobs *require* someone to be somewhere at a certain time. Transplant surgeons. I'm sure there are others. But this BS that women who want to work and be mothers hold other "professional" women back needs to go. I have zero patience for jobs that make up reasons why they have to be rigid.