Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does it take in DCPS to actually be fired? Not reassigned or brought back to central office and drawing a salary?
You don't understand. These issues are happening systemically. Principals are following orders FROM central office to get graduation rates up. Firing principals and/or teachers does not solve this problem.
Anonymous wrote:C’mon- my kids miss 5-6 days max especially HS kid. 18 days is a lot. Also look at PARCC correlation. If your kid is missing 18 days and getting 4s and 5s on the PARCC, I guess they are fine. This is not the case for majority of students though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does it take in DCPS to actually be fired? Not reassigned or brought back to central office and drawing a salary?
You realize the principal at Ballou was a carry over from Oakland by the Chancellor. Firing her would show poor judgment by the Chancellor for bringing her on.
Cronyism is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:People keep missing the point in all of this
Too many people are graduating who don't have the knowledge to graduate period. Absenteeisim is just a distraction. These "graduates" can't make their way out of a paper bag in many cases.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Report is pretty shocking. This is why graduation rates have gone up - because they will graduate just about anyone not because DCPS is doing anything better. If I was a Ballou parent, I would be outraged at the shenanigans at the school. Principal needs to be fired now but I feel bad as I’m sure there are people involved above her who will escape unscathed.
If a kid is missing that many days, then its clear the parents are all that interested or on top of their kids academic career. I think the parents expect the kids to do all the parenting. THis is the problem.
Some of these students don't have parents.
And for those students and other at-risk students the system should provide the needed wrap-around services, the exceptions to policy, etc.. There were 214 homeless seniors last year compared to the 3800 who were not homeless. So let's not try and negate the argument for more parent engagement by throwing around orphan and/or homeless status. That sort of argument is intended to shame people into not actually addressing a very real problem...the problem of checked out, bad parenting.
40% of all DCPS students are at risk. The percentage is even higher in the high schools.
DCPS had 2307 graduates last year. We should assume that at least 900 of those students were at risk.
Where can I find DCPS' or OSSE's definition of "at-risk status"? I saw this line in today's report: "For homeless students, a component of at-risk status, the corresponding share is 34.1% (Figure 18)" and thought it was saying that being homeless is a necessary component of being categorized as "at-risk." Therefore, I thought when the report reported 214 homeless seniors last year that would equate with the at-risk category. I'm guessing based on PP's response that it incorrect. So where is "at-risk" defined? And what are all the various "components"?
At risk is defined in the DCPS budget process. From the 2016 budget guidance:
"The new category defined at-risk in a specific way. It includes students who are homeless, in the foster care system, receive the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),
and over-age high school students."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Report is pretty shocking. This is why graduation rates have gone up - because they will graduate just about anyone not because DCPS is doing anything better. If I was a Ballou parent, I would be outraged at the shenanigans at the school. Principal needs to be fired now but I feel bad as I’m sure there are people involved above her who will escape unscathed.
If a kid is missing that many days, then its clear the parents are all that interested or on top of their kids academic career. I think the parents expect the kids to do all the parenting. THis is the problem.
Some of these students don't have parents.
And for those students and other at-risk students the system should provide the needed wrap-around services, the exceptions to policy, etc.. There were 214 homeless seniors last year compared to the 3800 who were not homeless. So let's not try and negate the argument for more parent engagement by throwing around orphan and/or homeless status. That sort of argument is intended to shame people into not actually addressing a very real problem...the problem of checked out, bad parenting.
40% of all DCPS students are at risk. The percentage is even higher in the high schools.
DCPS had 2307 graduates last year. We should assume that at least 900 of those students were at risk.
Where can I find DCPS' or OSSE's definition of "at-risk status"? I saw this line in today's report: "For homeless students, a component of at-risk status, the corresponding share is 34.1% (Figure 18)" and thought it was saying that being homeless is a necessary component of being categorized as "at-risk." Therefore, I thought when the report reported 214 homeless seniors last year that would equate with the at-risk category. I'm guessing based on PP's response that it incorrect. So where is "at-risk" defined? And what are all the various "components"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Report is pretty shocking. This is why graduation rates have gone up - because they will graduate just about anyone not because DCPS is doing anything better. If I was a Ballou parent, I would be outraged at the shenanigans at the school. Principal needs to be fired now but I feel bad as I’m sure there are people involved above her who will escape unscathed.
If a kid is missing that many days, then its clear the parents are all that interested or on top of their kids academic career. I think the parents expect the kids to do all the parenting. THis is the problem.
Some of these students don't have parents.
And for those students and other at-risk students the system should provide the needed wrap-around services, the exceptions to policy, etc.. There were 214 homeless seniors last year compared to the 3800 who were not homeless. So let's not try and negate the argument for more parent engagement by throwing around orphan and/or homeless status. That sort of argument is intended to shame people into not actually addressing a very real problem...the problem of checked out, bad parenting.
40% of all DCPS students are at risk. The percentage is even higher in the high schools.
DCPS had 2307 graduates last year. We should assume that at least 900 of those students were at risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does it take in DCPS to actually be fired? Not reassigned or brought back to central office and drawing a salary?
You don't understand. These issues are happening systemically. Principals are following orders FROM central office to get graduation rates up. Firing principals and/or teachers does not solve this problem.