Anonymous wrote:Yes but not enforced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a 30 minute break built into our schedules, but nobody enforces it. If I have to work through my lunch break, I leave after 8 hours. I'm not going to work 8.5 hours and get paid for 8. Most days I get my lunch break but some days it just doesn't happen.
This is clear time card fraud and is incredibly easy to fire for. Watch out. All it takes is the new administration pulling computer logs or time card logs
No it is not. Working 8 hour and charging 8 hours isn't called fraud; it's called accuracy. What are you talking about?
Technically, you are required to take the 30 minutes and are not allowed to leave after 8 hours, but I certainly wouldn't worry about time card fraud.
Pp here. I've seen it. I work on investigations.
We're wasting federal dollars investigating whether people take lunch? Hilarious
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A friend works for the federal government and told me she’s required to take a 45 minute lunch break, e.g., her hours for an 8 hour day are not 9am-5pm but 9am-5:45pm. Is this true for all federal agencies? I am considering a job at DOT and planning childcare.
Actually it is still 30 mins for an 8 hour day.
It is required but only asshole managers enforce it. Including my manager.
Even though I work through lunch most of the time I still stay the extra 30 mins .
But I get paid good money so there is that
Anonymous wrote:It's not a federal government issue. Any work shift of 6 hours or more has to offer a 30 minute "lunch" break (doesn't have to be at lunch) and those 30 minutes don't need to be paid. Workers must also have a 15 minute paid break for every 4 hours worked. So an 8 hour shift requires two 15 minute paid breaks and one 30 minute unpaid break. There are rules around when those breaks can happen so that you don't just bundle it together and leave an hour early.
Have you all never held a non-exempt job?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a 30 minute break built into our schedules, but nobody enforces it. If I have to work through my lunch break, I leave after 8 hours. I'm not going to work 8.5 hours and get paid for 8. Most days I get my lunch break but some days it just doesn't happen.
This is clear time card fraud and is incredibly easy to fire for. Watch out. All it takes is the new administration pulling computer logs or time card logs
No it is not. Working 8 hour and charging 8 hours isn't called fraud; it's called accuracy. What are you talking about?
Technically, you are required to take the 30 minutes and are not allowed to leave after 8 hours, but I certainly wouldn't worry about time card fraud.
Pp here. I've seen it. I work on investigations.
We're wasting federal dollars investigating whether people take lunch? Hilarious
Anonymous wrote:A friend works for the federal government and told me she’s required to take a 45 minute lunch break, e.g., her hours for an 8 hour day are not 9am-5pm but 9am-5:45pm. Is this true for all federal agencies? I am considering a job at DOT and planning childcare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a 30 minute break built into our schedules, but nobody enforces it. If I have to work through my lunch break, I leave after 8 hours. I'm not going to work 8.5 hours and get paid for 8. Most days I get my lunch break but some days it just doesn't happen.
This is clear time card fraud and is incredibly easy to fire for. Watch out. All it takes is the new administration pulling computer logs or time card logs
No it is not. Working 8 hour and charging 8 hours isn't called fraud; it's called accuracy. What are you talking about?
Technically, you are required to take the 30 minutes and are not allowed to leave after 8 hours, but I certainly wouldn't worry about time card fraud.
Pp here. I've seen it. I work on investigations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to change the topic, but my agency provides 2 15-minute paid breaks, and I think many others do. Does your agency enforce taking those breaks? One of my friends at another agency combines those to "cover" the unpaid 30 minute lunch, which isn't allowed per se but she says everyone does it.
Your friend is commiting time card fraud.
I don't know if it's the same poster doing this, but someone is throwing out the "fraud" word very liberally, which is different from non-compliance with T&A policy.
Fraud is the intentional misreporting of time to the government in order to gain unearned benefit. Coming into the office for 1 hour and charging 8 hours is clear fraud. Not working on a telework day is fraud. Charging 3 hrs OT when leaving after 8 hours is fraud. I get that.
Performing work at the wrong time per policy, however, isn't a clear case of fraud. The key distinction is work being performed. The IG is after people who are charging time and not working. If you are working and have evidence of work being performed, timecard fraud is not going to be the conclusion.
Also, for all the people working through lunch and not reporting the time, isn't that technically timecard fraud? Isn't it illegal to work for free for the government?
Bottom line: report your time accuracy and in a manner that can be justified and you'll be fine.
No. you can work as much extra as you want to. You cannot leave before 8.5 hours. We need very senior approval for overtime. I've never gotten it in 10 years as a fed.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for all the answers--I had no idea this was such a thorny issue. It seems like assuming a required 30 minute lunch is a safe bet. It makes things difficult as a parent when childcare is only 8am-6pm, it takes almost an hour to get to work, then can't leave until 5:30. I'd much rather bring my lunch and eat at my desk while working so I can leave at 5pm!