Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.
NO, missy, it was not "sarcasm." President Trump Loves This Land (and calls it by it's name, America.) And he loves to sing that love loud, proud and true.
Actually our name is the United States of America. Surely anyone with a 4th grade education knows that.
Trump loves himself. Maybe his daughter Ivanka, but only because he sees himself reflected in her (somehow...). He's incapable of loving anyone or anything else. Well, except for Big Macs and golf and gold toilets, so I take that back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.
NO, missy, it was not "sarcasm." President Trump Loves This Land (and calls it by it's name, America.) And he loves to sing that love loud, proud and true.
Anonymous wrote:Well, well, well, looks like a couple of liberal eliters who hate this Land I will call America and that President Trump is now working his fingers to the bone for, have decided to inject theyre liberal snake oil toxins into a true blue American's dream of a brighter today, let alone tomorrow. If President Trump wants to sing his song of empathy to the man on a pedestal, then I say let him join those who value the truth in our soil as much as past templates In Sod We Trust, no that's you. I prefer God. And if you don;t get it, you will have to forget it. TIA>
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.
NO, missy, it was not "sarcasm." President Trump Loves This Land (and calls it by it's name, America.) And he loves to sing that love loud, proud and true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.
NO, missy, it was not "sarcasm." President Trump Loves This Land (and calls it by it's name, America.) And he loves to sing that love loud, proud and true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lies, damn lies. He loves this land and he loves to sing.
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I just watched it. He definitely had that look of grandpa who doesn't know where he is. Mind wandering bigly.
And what was with the hand on his heart that he kept flapping?
That is a classic involuntary movement people make when they can't remember something. Also, it looks like the poor guy next to him was biting his cheek so hard ... to keep from laughing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.
THat didn't seem to bother liberals.
Obama understood the Constitution quite well. The folks who think he didn't are the ones who don't know the Constitution. Carrying around your little pocket Constitution means nothing if you haven't actually read it and thought about it, let alone even begun to understand the 200 years of case law around how SCOTUS has interpreted it.
I agree, Obama did understand the Constitution well. He simply didn't believe in it. And still doesn't. Which is why he willfully violated it so many times.
Anonymous wrote:So I just watched it. He definitely had that look of grandpa who doesn't know where he is. Mind wandering bigly.
And what was with the hand on his heart that he kept flapping?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.
THat didn't seem to bother liberals.
You've put too much stock in what conservative pundits like Hannity say.
Let me let you in on a little secret: When they said "unconstitutional" they were just using the word in the same way that a 5 year old would use something like "poopyhead."
"Obama's unconstitutional policies" = "Obama's poopyhead policies."
They referred to the Constitution but there was no Constitutional argument. A constitutionality argument would have and should have been pursued in the courts - but you'll note that virtually none of the things the talking heads declared to be "unconstitutional" were - and that the handful of legal challenges that did go to the courts did not hold up to scrutiny.
It has the worst record of any modern presidency, whether you count in absolute won-loss – where the solicitor general’s office struggles to get to 50 percent, against a historical norm of 70 percent – or by unanimous losses alone.
While we’re still in the part of the Court’s term before the decisions start flying fast and furiously, I thought I’d present the latest update on where we stand with respect to those unanimous losses, where President Obama doesn’t even get the votes of the two justices he appointed. Here are the stats:
In the first 6.5 years of Obama’s presidency (January 2009 to June 2015), the government lost unanimously at the Supreme Court 23 times, an average of 3.62 cases per year.
The Supreme Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Obama administration’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which were conducted while the Senate was formally in session.
The “decision marks the 12th time the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Obama administration on the issue of executive power,” Heritage Foundation legal expert Elizabeth Slattery explains.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama didn;t know the Constitution.
THat didn't seem to bother liberals.
Obama understood the Constitution quite well. The folks who think he didn't are the ones who don't know the Constitution. Carrying around your little pocket Constitution means nothing if you haven't actually read it and thought about it, let alone even begun to understand the 200 years of case law around how SCOTUS has interpreted it.