
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.
Nope, not at all. Should have known better than the believe Republicans would accept a loss with grace and dignity.
You have zero evidence to support your assertion and how dare you question the motives of the judicial panel.
Did you look at the ballot at issue? Each of the marks in that race matched the way the person had marked their vote in another race. The only basis to conclude he intended to vote for Yancey is to presume that because someone voted Republican in the over races, he must have also intended to vote Republican in that race. Because no one ever votes a split ticket apparently. So corrupt, but anything to stay in power, I guess.
False. Did your temper tantrum make you feel better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.
Nope, not at all. Should have known better than the believe Republicans would accept a loss with grace and dignity.
You have zero evidence to support your assertion and how dare you question the motives of the judicial panel.
Did you look at the ballot at issue? Each of the marks in that race matched the way the person had marked their vote in another race. The only basis to conclude he intended to vote for Yancey is to presume that because someone voted Republican in the over races, he must have also intended to vote Republican in that race. Because no one ever votes a split ticket apparently. So corrupt, but anything to stay in power, I guess.
False. Did your temper tantrum make you feel better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:See what can happen when you give felons the right to vote?????
If you think that the Democratic tidal wave that is hitting this country as a result of the incredibly incompetent vile Presidency of Donald Trump is due to "felons being given a right to vote," you are dumber than he is.
A win by one vote, and you call this a “tidal wave?”
OK.
You chose a president who WON with -3M votes and you have a audacity to discount a 1 vote win? She is 3M+1 vote win ahead of the trumpard you chose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.
Nope, not at all. Should have known better than the believe Republicans would accept a loss with grace and dignity.
You have zero evidence to support your assertion and how dare you question the motives of the judicial panel.
Did you look at the ballot at issue? Each of the marks in that race matched the way the person had marked their vote in another race. The only basis to conclude he intended to vote for Yancey is to presume that because someone voted Republican in the over races, he must have also intended to vote Republican in that race. Because no one ever votes a split ticket apparently. So corrupt, but anything to stay in power, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.
Nope, not at all. Should have known better than the believe Republicans would accept a loss with grace and dignity.
You have zero evidence to support your assertion and how dare you question the motives of the judicial panel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.
Nope, not at all. Should have known better than the believe Republicans would accept a loss with grace and dignity.
Anonymous wrote:Someone filled in a bubble for each candidate and then "crossed out" Simonds name.
WHAT. THE. FUCK. Yeah, that's not shady or anything.