Anonymous wrote:eh a lot of those people probably have pensions worth 1-2M maybe even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this statistic is pretty useless. DC area residents are not anywhere near the median in terms of education, income, or housing costs. I'd be willing to bet that most people in NW DC or close-in suburbs have at least $2 million in net worth by the time they retire.
So the only people who count as DC area residents are the ones who live in NW, Arlington or Bethesda? Interesting view of the world. If you live in SE/SW or Alexandria or Falls Church or Rockville, you aren't a DC area resident? Bc I'm fairly sure you'll find LOTS of households in those areas where $2 million at retirement would be akin to hitting the lottery.
If you want to feel better about yourself, by all means compare yourself to the national median. But realistically you should benchmark yourself against people who have had the same economic opportunities. In this region, people who live in NW, Arlington, or Bethesda are the ones who are above median. People who live in SE/SW or Gaithersburg are below median. Just because you can find others who are in your financial situation doesn't mean that it's not below median for the region and any higher expectations are unrealistic.
Economic opportunities are determined by geographic location, really? So every person in Manhattan has astounding economic opportunity because Manhattan has hedge fund portfolio managers, so everyone has a shot to be a hedge fund PM bc they live in the same area? And a scientist at NIH has the same economic opportunity as someone who works Carlyle or a lobbyist bc they all live and work within a few miles of each other?
I don't need to feel better about myself thanks -- very secure in my saving/investing decisions. Unlike you I recognize however that not everyone has equal opportunities so faulting and mocking others is of no use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this statistic is pretty useless. DC area residents are not anywhere near the median in terms of education, income, or housing costs. I'd be willing to bet that most people in NW DC or close-in suburbs have at least $2 million in net worth by the time they retire.
So the only people who count as DC area residents are the ones who live in NW, Arlington or Bethesda? Interesting view of the world. If you live in SE/SW or Alexandria or Falls Church or Rockville, you aren't a DC area resident? Bc I'm fairly sure you'll find LOTS of households in those areas where $2 million at retirement would be akin to hitting the lottery.
If you want to feel better about yourself, by all means compare yourself to the national median. But realistically you should benchmark yourself against people who have had the same economic opportunities. In this region, people who live in NW, Arlington, or Bethesda are the ones who are above median. People who live in SE/SW or Gaithersburg are below median. Just because you can find others who are in your financial situation doesn't mean that it's not below median for the region and any higher expectations are unrealistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this statistic is pretty useless. DC area residents are not anywhere near the median in terms of education, income, or housing costs. I'd be willing to bet that most people in NW DC or close-in suburbs have at least $2 million in net worth by the time they retire.
So the only people who count as DC area residents are the ones who live in NW, Arlington or Bethesda? Interesting view of the world. If you live in SE/SW or Alexandria or Falls Church or Rockville, you aren't a DC area resident? Bc I'm fairly sure you'll find LOTS of households in those areas where $2 million at retirement would be akin to hitting the lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this statistic is pretty useless. DC area residents are not anywhere near the median in terms of education, income, or housing costs. I'd be willing to bet that most people in NW DC or close-in suburbs have at least $2 million in net worth by the time they retire.
So the only people who count as DC area residents are the ones who live in NW, Arlington or Bethesda? Interesting view of the world. If you live in SE/SW or Alexandria or Falls Church or Rockville, you aren't a DC area resident? Bc I'm fairly sure you'll find LOTS of households in those areas where $2 million at retirement would be akin to hitting the lottery.
Anonymous wrote:I think this statistic is pretty useless. DC area residents are not anywhere near the median in terms of education, income, or housing costs. I'd be willing to bet that most people in NW DC or close-in suburbs have at least $2 million in net worth by the time they retire.
Anonymous wrote:So for my wife and I (54 & 51, respectively), our $350K doesn't look so bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, but having only $17K saved is NOT a good thing either. There are financial sites that can advise you on how much you need to be/should be saving. You don't need to rely on DCUM estimates - aim for what legitimate financial sites indicate you will need.
no kidding its not good enough. the point is that most of america is not prepared for retirement.
and whose fault is that?
I don't think this thread is about fault -- the point is that people in DC are somewhat out of touch. do you not agree?
It may also become all of our problem when a great number of American are destitute in retirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My property taxes are $1000 a month
And where do you live? Do you think most of America lives in a home like yours?
Toronto
No, but i don't know anyone who pays under $500.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My property taxes are $1000 a month
And where do you live? Do you think most of America lives in a home like yours?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, but having only $17K saved is NOT a good thing either. There are financial sites that can advise you on how much you need to be/should be saving. You don't need to rely on DCUM estimates - aim for what legitimate financial sites indicate you will need.
no kidding its not good enough. the point is that most of america is not prepared for retirement.
and whose fault is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, but having only $17K saved is NOT a good thing either. There are financial sites that can advise you on how much you need to be/should be saving. You don't need to rely on DCUM estimates - aim for what legitimate financial sites indicate you will need.
no kidding its not good enough. the point is that most of america is not prepared for retirement.