Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't it be about real estate values? That was the only thing GS was used for. As it basically measured test scores (and SES status), it was the metric that homebuyers found useful in evaluating school quality. Now that it is pushing measures of diversity and gaps between groups, it will be worthless in its prior use. Just another business to sacrifice its product to the political whims. It will fade into complete obscurity.
Right, now you'll have to figure out a better way to assess how many poor minority kids live nearby.
Well, I suppose we could always just look at SOL scores. I wonder how people did it in the old days before GS.
I
Oh, I forgot, SES segregation is a new phenomenon.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't it be about real estate values? That was the only thing GS was used for. As it basically measured test scores (and SES status), it was the metric that homebuyers found useful in evaluating school quality. Now that it is pushing measures of diversity and gaps between groups, it will be worthless in its prior use. Just another business to sacrifice its product to the political whims. It will fade into complete obscurity.
Right, now you'll have to figure out a better way to assess how many poor minority kids live nearby.
Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't it be about real estate values? That was the only thing GS was used for. As it basically measured test scores (and SES status), it was the metric that homebuyers found useful in evaluating school quality. Now that it is pushing measures of diversity and gaps between groups, it will be worthless in its prior use. Just another business to sacrifice its product to the political whims. It will fade into complete obscurity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cry me a river.
Has the school changed or is it just the methodology in rating the school changed?
Don't buy a house based on third party school rating website.
They have no power over you.
Lol. Tell that to everyone buying houses. People use GS, even if you think they shouldn't.
Anonymous wrote:Cry me a river.
Has the school changed or is it just the methodology in rating the school changed?
Don't buy a house based on third party school rating website.
They have no power over you.
Anonymous wrote:I know it shouldn't bother me but my elementary school dropped from a 7 to a 4. My mom had a big lecture today on how we can't send dd there for kindergarten next year. Nagging me to pay for private and why didn't I buy a few streets over where that school is better. Ugh. Neighborhood is high income mixed with 30% low income and that seems to have failed the school.
I will be sending my kid there but I'm pissed the score fell so much in one year, that low income students aren't doing well and that the school just isn't educating well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it shouldn't bother me but my elementary school dropped from a 7 to a 4. My mom had a big lecture today on how we can't send dd there for kindergarten next year. Nagging me to pay for private and why didn't I buy a few streets over where that school is better. Ugh. Neighborhood is high income mixed with 30% low income and that seems to have failed the school.
I will be sending my kid there but I'm pissed the score fell so much in one year, that low income students aren't doing well and that the school just isn't educating well.
Barret?
Barret’s GS has been in the toilet for a while. Not news.
Anonymous wrote:I know it shouldn't bother me but my elementary school dropped from a 7 to a 4. My mom had a big lecture today on how we can't send dd there for kindergarten next year. Nagging me to pay for private and why didn't I buy a few streets over where that school is better. Ugh. Neighborhood is high income mixed with 30% low income and that seems to have failed the school.
I will be sending my kid there but I'm pissed the score fell so much in one year, that low income students aren't doing well and that the school just isn't educating well.