Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is this in real estate?
It belongs in politics.
How is it political? It's about real estate and someone accused by a federal grand jury of a crime, including conspiracy against the United States. These are facts. There's nothing actually political about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is a cute house. Lots of pictures on other sites.
link? I want to live vicariously lol
Anonymous wrote:Why is this in real estate?
It belongs in politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://weddingstylemagazine.com/inspiration/real-weddings/andrea-manafort-christopher-shand
Blood money wedding. How many Ukrainians protesting for their freedom were killed by Manafort's patron, Yanukovich?
I hope she loved her Pintrest-worthy gala. Pretty gross to see these people "play house" with a $2m house, multiple hundreds of thousand$ wedding, etc.
Anonymous wrote:It is a cute house. Lots of pictures on other sites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to live right around the corner from that house -- it was stunning, especially before the previous owners subdivided the lot. When they put it up for sale, the open house was INSANE.
It's such a special house. What a shame it's been tainted by those ugly people.
But yes, I know what you meant.
Anonymous wrote:I used to live right around the corner from that house -- it was stunning, especially before the previous owners subdivided the lot. When they put it up for sale, the open house was INSANE.
It's such a special house. What a shame it's been tainted by those ugly people.
Anonymous wrote:Why is this in real estate?
It belongs in politics.
Anonymous wrote:https://weddingstylemagazine.com/inspiration/real-weddings/andrea-manafort-christopher-shand
Anonymous wrote:So if it actually sold for $100K under asking price then magically increased $300K shortly thereafter as someone has suggested - wonder if that was another bit of getting money to some operative.... e.g., Russian connection buys home for $1.9 and flips it to someone for $2.2 a short time later ... could be a way to pass $300K on?
Anonymous wrote:It seems like there’s a pretty good chance she knew the money was dirty. Remember her hacked texts about “blood money”? https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/manaforts-u...ed-qualms-hack-suggests-235473
“In one March 2015 exchange that appears to be between the two sisters, Andrea Manafort seems to suggest that their father bore some responsibility for the deaths of protesters at the hands of police loyal to Yanukovych during a monthslong uprising that started in late 2013.
“Don't fool yourself,” Andrea Manafort wrote. “That money we have is blood money.”
In another hacked exchange a few months later with someone else, Andrea Manafort wrote that her father’s “work and payment in Ukraine is legally questionable.””
All of this. You can't accept blood money and not run the risk of the feds coming for it eventually.