Anonymous wrote:"Because being exact and precise is just useless, is that right?"
Being exact and precise is the point of this discussion. It is neither exact nor precise to claim that all or even most of the majority of engineers' work doesn't involve, "getting the job done and on to production or testing."
RIT has a useful graph that helps explain what engineers actually do. http://www.rit.edu/emcs/admissions/academics/majors/engineering-tech-or-engineering
I doubt there are many engineers that spend their entire careers at one level of the chart but very few ever get to the big league of space vehicles.
Those that do have overlapping checks and balances that weed out imperfections in the overall project and don't often rely on one person being infallible.
The engineer who works on Mars vehicles fall under what RIT calls "Complex design and analysis" that would be say the top 10% of engineers. The average 50th percentile engineer works in what RIT calls "Development and design" a much more forgiving field.
"So, your idea is that it's okay to say, send an exploratory Mars vehicle crashing into the planet after the LM ' engineers' (loose term because LM often hires non engineers to do engineering jobs - saves money!) didn't know how to make an accurate calculation or to understand how a result didn't make sense and was wrong. Because being exact and precise is just useless, is that right? I mean, what's $125 million and 5-10 years of an army's worth of people designing, testing , launching and monitoring the vehicle, right? No biggee!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have him get a teaching degree. Or how about being a mechanic?
Engineering isn't really about taking things apart. It's about problem solving through endless calculations and strategies.
True, most engineers have good mechanical skills, but they also need very strong academic skills.
They also need to be very careful and precise - ' doesn't test well' is not impressive.
This is so untrue. You are clearly not an engineer. My job #1 with new engineers is to to break them of this notion that was beat into them by their teachers and overbearing parent. It needs to be good enough. We can fix it in the next version (as long as it does not kill anybody). Nothing is ever perfect. It needs to go to production, now.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I don't have any problem with his working in a trade (I think he could make a decent living with the skills and knowledge he already has), but I know he would be bored to tears at NVCC. He taught himself Algebra a couple of years ago over the summer, and he recently won a timed robotics contest with enough time left to help other kids with their projects (which was allowed and which he happily did). He has been bored at summer classes at GMU in robotics and engineering three years when we last sent him because he knew it all already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have him get a teaching degree. Or how about being a mechanic?
Engineering isn't really about taking things apart. It's about problem solving through endless calculations and strategies.
True, most engineers have good mechanical skills, but they also need very strong academic skills.
They also need to be very careful and precise - ' doesn't test well' is not impressive.
This is so untrue. You are clearly not an engineer. My job #1 with new engineers is to to break them of this notion that was beat into them by their teachers and overbearing parent. It needs to be good enough. We can fix it in the next version (as long as it does not kill anybody). Nothing is ever perfect. It needs to go to production, now.
Anonymous wrote:I am loving the thread on schools for average kids. I have a kid who is not a great tester and is likely to have something like a 3.5 GPA (only a sophomore, so too soon to tell). But he is a born engineer (likely mechanical or civil). He's the kid who's been taking things apart and putting them back together since he was 2, spends his weekends working on old cars, buys/repairs/resells old computers. Ideally, I think he'll do better in a small school; I think he's gotten a little lost in a big high school.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have him get a teaching degree. Or how about being a mechanic?
Engineering isn't really about taking things apart. It's about problem solving through endless calculations and strategies.
True, most engineers have good mechanical skills, but they also need very strong academic skills.
They also need to be very careful and precise - ' doesn't test well' is not impressive.
This is so untrue. You are clearly not an engineer. My job #1 with new engineers is to to break them of this notion that was beat into them by their teachers and overbearing parent. It needs to be good enough. We can fix it in the next version (as long as it does not kill anybody). Nothing is ever perfect. It needs to go to production, now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have him get a teaching degree. Or how about being a mechanic?
Engineering isn't really about taking things apart. It's about problem solving through endless calculations and strategies.
True, most engineers have good mechanical skills, but they also need very strong academic skills.
They also need to be very careful and precise - ' doesn't test well' is not impressive.
Way to be condescending and dismissive of someone's child!
My kid (who does test well) might try engineering because he's good at math and science and isn't sure what else he wants to do. OP's kid is probably more likely to be successful.
There are no 'average' engineers. The professors, even at a so called 'average' school will brutally weed him out of the program. Engineering is a very exact profession. You HAVE to test well. I honestly predict that this kid will get a report card full of D's and F's freshman year.
It will not be pleasant for him.
Anonymous wrote:Have him get a teaching degree. Or how about being a mechanic?
Engineering isn't really about taking things apart. It's about problem solving through endless calculations and strategies.
True, most engineers have good mechanical skills, but they also need very strong academic skills.
They also need to be very careful and precise - ' doesn't test well' is not impressive.