Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
I don't drive but I'm assuming that with enough tickets you are not allowed on the road. Would it be so with fare jumpers? how many tickets before you are banned?
Parking and red light camera tickets differ from other citations in that they are issued to the owner of the vehicle, regardless of who is driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. For this reason, they do not carry points, and you can't get your license suspended for that. DC is trying to make fare evasion the equivalent of a parking ticket or a red light camera ticket. Why should jumping a turnstile be punished so much more harshly with a criminal penalty than running a red light, which just earns a fine? You can do far more harm to others running a red light .
What if an officer sees you run the light? What happens then? I'm not sure how a camera will catch metro fare jumpers and send a ticket to the home.
Does your insurance go up? I'm thinking there is more of a disincentive than you are making out.
There's a point at which someone who disregards the laws around a service shouldn't be allowed to use the service, as who knows what other laws they are disregarding.
If we did that there'd be no rush hour because most of the drivers would be off the road.
+1. There's no use in criminalizing non-criminal behavior like fare evasion. It's a crime of poverty most of the time. Jailing people for that is too harsh, particularly when other crimes that can be more dangerous (like running a red light) are just fined.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
I don't drive but I'm assuming that with enough tickets you are not allowed on the road. Would it be so with fare jumpers? how many tickets before you are banned?
Parking and red light camera tickets differ from other citations in that they are issued to the owner of the vehicle, regardless of who is driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. For this reason, they do not carry points, and you can't get your license suspended for that. DC is trying to make fare evasion the equivalent of a parking ticket or a red light camera ticket. Why should jumping a turnstile be punished so much more harshly with a criminal penalty than running a red light, which just earns a fine? You can do far more harm to others running a red light .
What if an officer sees you run the light? What happens then? I'm not sure how a camera will catch metro fare jumpers and send a ticket to the home.
Does your insurance go up? I'm thinking there is more of a disincentive than you are making out.
There's a point at which someone who disregards the laws around a service shouldn't be allowed to use the service, as who knows what other laws they are disregarding.
If we did that there'd be no rush hour because most of the drivers would be off the road.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
I don't drive but I'm assuming that with enough tickets you are not allowed on the road. Would it be so with fare jumpers? how many tickets before you are banned?
Parking and red light camera tickets differ from other citations in that they are issued to the owner of the vehicle, regardless of who is driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. For this reason, they do not carry points, and you can't get your license suspended for that. DC is trying to make fare evasion the equivalent of a parking ticket or a red light camera ticket. Why should jumping a turnstile be punished so much more harshly with a criminal penalty than running a red light, which just earns a fine? You can do far more harm to others running a red light .
What if an officer sees you run the light? What happens then? I'm not sure how a camera will catch metro fare jumpers and send a ticket to the home.
Does your insurance go up? I'm thinking there is more of a disincentive than you are making out.
There's a point at which someone who disregards the laws around a service shouldn't be allowed to use the service, as who knows what other laws they are disregarding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
I don't drive but I'm assuming that with enough tickets you are not allowed on the road. Would it be so with fare jumpers? how many tickets before you are banned?
Parking and red light camera tickets differ from other citations in that they are issued to the owner of the vehicle, regardless of who is driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. For this reason, they do not carry points, and you can't get your license suspended for that. DC is trying to make fare evasion the equivalent of a parking ticket or a red light camera ticket. Why should jumping a turnstile be punished so much more harshly with a criminal penalty than running a red light, which just earns a fine? You can do far more harm to others running a red light .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
I don't drive but I'm assuming that with enough tickets you are not allowed on the road. Would it be so with fare jumpers? how many tickets before you are banned?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to the Save Our System Campaign for their efforts to decriminalize fare evasion.
More like Save Our Local Criminal Element.
The broken window rule is that if police don't sweat the small stuff, the public feels powerless in the face of lawlessness and criminals feel more empowered to commit more serious crimes.
What the proposed legislation would do is make fare jumping the equivalent of a parking ticket, a speeding ticket or a red light ticket. From a resource allocation standpoint, I am not sure I see the problem. Are people saying that fare jumping is more "criminal" than speeding or running a red light?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder why crime is high?
A huge part of the problem is that our courts are a revolving door especially the pathetic joke that is our juvie system.
Crackdown hard maga
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder why crime is high?
A huge part of the problem is that our courts are a revolving door especially the pathetic joke that is our juvie system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to D.C. Council Member Trayon White who introduced the bill in July aimed at decriminalizing fare evasion on Metro, arguing there were better uses of police resources and that harsh penalties for fare evaders do little public good.
Trayon wants to inherit the old Marion Barry base -- the folks who have frequent run ins with the criminal justice system.
And?
Losers kiss up to losers.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder why crime is high?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to D.C. Council Member Trayon White who introduced the bill in July aimed at decriminalizing fare evasion on Metro, arguing there were better uses of police resources and that harsh penalties for fare evaders do little public good.
Trayon wants to inherit the old Marion Barry base -- the folks who have frequent run ins with the criminal justice system.
And?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shout out to D.C. Council Member Trayon White who introduced the bill in July aimed at decriminalizing fare evasion on Metro, arguing there were better uses of police resources and that harsh penalties for fare evaders do little public good.
Trayon wants to inherit the old Marion Barry base -- the folks who have frequent run ins with the criminal justice system.
Birds of a feather flock together as the saying goes.