Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Magnet programs take up host school resources. Allowing home school kids easier entry into magnet programs (ex, tpms, rmib) seems reasonable compensation.
Actually they don't. They are funded from a different bucket altogether by MCPS.
Magnet programs do the following -
-> Bring the academic scores of the school up
-> Lower the discipline issues in the school
-> Bring parents who have more resources to the school (usually you see the changes when parents start/fund programs, volunteer to chaperone field-trips, donate to school causes, start clubs, seek out outside opportunities for the students) and are more engaged. RM parents started an IB Foundation a few years ago that benefits all students doing the diploma program not just RMIB magnet students
-> Provide opportunities to other high-achieving non-magnet students within the school to be in a class with high performing peers and also to avail of opportunities that are opened up because of the magnet population - teams, clubs, volunteer opportunities, outreach, academic preparation
-> Becomes attractive to teachers who want to teach these students. Once these teachers are in the school they also take on other roles - club sponsors, team leads etc.
-> Make the area attractive to prospective home-buyers and lead to revitalization of that community.
What it does not do -
-> Increase the academic abilities of low and medium performing students. Magnet classrooms do not create the phenomenon where by mixing magnet students with non-magnet students will result in some sort of osmosis of abilities from high performing students to low performing students. Regardless of what MCPS is daydreaming. Not. Gonna. Happen.
I believe the only additional funding host schools receive is for a program coordinator. All other resources are shared. Everything else you listed as perks for housing a magnet program are questionable when comprehensive classes are overcrowded.
Yet, no school wants to lose their magnet programs do they? Their spectacular performance will drop without the magnet programs and they will be the bottom of the heap schools where the teachers and Principal actually need to work hard to bring their numbers up. Maybe magnet programs should be housed in seperate magnet schools - like Poolsville HS is? Maybe the reporting of a school statistics should be based on breaking the magnet away from the comprehensive program? Please let me know what ranking RM will have without the RMIB program?
Anonymous wrote:
For the PP who is trying to paint me as elitist that I am complaining that RM has "put in "not as qualified" RM kids in with your super duper smart kids", I do not consider my kids as super duper smart. I have already mentioned that there are many qualified kids in RM who would succeed in the magnet program, and they should be in the cohort in 9th grade. In fact JWMS students have a quota of 25/30 seats in 9th grade through the application process. I also know there are many similar kids who are rejected ever year with statement that "RM magnet program does not have enough seats for all qualified" students. I have helped around 10 parents over the years to write their appeal letters and only 4 have succeeded. All 10 were as smart (if not smarter) than my kids. I have a problem when RM kids who do not have to prove their "qualification" anymore can get into the magnet program in 11th grade, when many non-RM kids like these are refused a seat even though the selection committee finds them qualified to succeed in the program.
Anonymous wrote:OP, are these concerns being raised at any RM IB magnet parent specific forum of the school?
Anonymous wrote:
Yet, no school wants to lose their magnet programs do they? Their spectacular performance will drop without the magnet programs and they will be the bottom of the heap schools where the teachers and Principal actually need to work hard to bring their numbers up. Maybe magnet programs should be housed in seperate magnet schools - like Poolsville HS is? Maybe the reporting of a school statistics should be based on breaking the magnet away from the comprehensive program? Please let me know what ranking RM will have without the RMIB program?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Magnet programs take up host school resources. Allowing home school kids easier entry into magnet programs (ex, tpms, rmib) seems reasonable compensation.
Actually they don't. They are funded from a different bucket altogether by MCPS.
Magnet programs do the following -
-> Bring the academic scores of the school up
-> Lower the discipline issues in the school
-> Bring parents who have more resources to the school (usually you see the changes when parents start/fund programs, volunteer to chaperone field-trips, donate to school causes, start clubs, seek out outside opportunities for the students) and are more engaged. RM parents started an IB Foundation a few years ago that benefits all students doing the diploma program not just RMIB magnet students
-> Provide opportunities to other high-achieving non-magnet students within the school to be in a class with high performing peers and also to avail of opportunities that are opened up because of the magnet population - teams, clubs, volunteer opportunities, outreach, academic preparation
-> Becomes attractive to teachers who want to teach these students. Once these teachers are in the school they also take on other roles - club sponsors, team leads etc.
-> Make the area attractive to prospective home-buyers and lead to revitalization of that community.
What it does not do -
-> Increase the academic abilities of low and medium performing students. Magnet classrooms do not create the phenomenon where by mixing magnet students with non-magnet students will result in some sort of osmosis of abilities from high performing students to low performing students. Regardless of what MCPS is daydreaming. Not. Gonna. Happen.
I believe the only additional funding host schools receive is for a program coordinator. All other resources are shared. Everything else you listed as perks for housing a magnet program are questionable when comprehensive classes are overcrowded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Actually they don't. They are funded from a different bucket altogether by MCPS.
Magnet programs do the following -
-> Bring the academic scores of the school up
-> Lower the discipline issues in the school
-> Bring parents who have more resources to the school (usually you see the changes when parents start/fund programs, volunteer to chaperone field-trips, donate to school causes, start clubs, seek out outside opportunities for the students) and are more engaged. RM parents started an IB Foundation a few years ago that benefits all students doing the diploma program not just RMIB magnet students
-> Provide opportunities to other high-achieving non-magnet students within the school to be in a class with high performing peers and also to avail of opportunities that are opened up because of the magnet population - teams, clubs, volunteer opportunities, outreach, academic preparation
-> Becomes attractive to teachers who want to teach these students. Once these teachers are in the school they also take on other roles - club sponsors, team leads etc.
-> Make the area attractive to prospective home-buyers and lead to revitalization of that community.
What it does not do -
-> Increase the academic abilities of low and medium performing students. Magnet classrooms do not create the phenomenon where by mixing magnet students with non-magnet students will result in some sort of osmosis of abilities from high performing students to low performing students. Regardless of what MCPS is daydreaming. Not. Gonna. Happen.
That's what OP is complaining about.
Anonymous wrote:
Actually they don't. They are funded from a different bucket altogether by MCPS.
Magnet programs do the following -
-> Bring the academic scores of the school up
-> Lower the discipline issues in the school
-> Bring parents who have more resources to the school (usually you see the changes when parents start/fund programs, volunteer to chaperone field-trips, donate to school causes, start clubs, seek out outside opportunities for the students) and are more engaged. RM parents started an IB Foundation a few years ago that benefits all students doing the diploma program not just RMIB magnet students
-> Provide opportunities to other high-achieving non-magnet students within the school to be in a class with high performing peers and also to avail of opportunities that are opened up because of the magnet population - teams, clubs, volunteer opportunities, outreach, academic preparation
-> Becomes attractive to teachers who want to teach these students. Once these teachers are in the school they also take on other roles - club sponsors, team leads etc.
-> Make the area attractive to prospective home-buyers and lead to revitalization of that community.
What it does not do -
-> Increase the academic abilities of low and medium performing students. Magnet classrooms do not create the phenomenon where by mixing magnet students with non-magnet students will result in some sort of osmosis of abilities from high performing students to low performing students. Regardless of what MCPS is daydreaming. Not. Gonna. Happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Magnet programs take up host school resources. Allowing home school kids easier entry into magnet programs (ex, tpms, rmib) seems reasonable compensation.
Actually they don't. They are funded from a different bucket altogether by MCPS.
Magnet programs do the following -
-> Bring the academic scores of the school up
-> Lower the discipline issues in the school
-> Bring parents who have more resources to the school (usually you see the changes when parents start/fund programs, volunteer to chaperone field-trips, donate to school causes, start clubs, seek out outside opportunities for the students) and are more engaged. RM parents started an IB Foundation a few years ago that benefits all students doing the diploma program not just RMIB magnet students
-> Provide opportunities to other high-achieving non-magnet students within the school to be in a class with high performing peers and also to avail of opportunities that are opened up because of the magnet population - teams, clubs, volunteer opportunities, outreach, academic preparation
-> Becomes attractive to teachers who want to teach these students. Once these teachers are in the school they also take on other roles - club sponsors, team leads etc.
-> Make the area attractive to prospective home-buyers and lead to revitalization of that community.
What it does not do -
-> Increase the academic abilities of low and medium performing students. Magnet classrooms do not create the phenomenon where by mixing magnet students with non-magnet students will result in some sort of osmosis of abilities from high performing students to low performing students. Regardless of what MCPS is daydreaming. Not. Gonna. Happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That may be true. However, the decline in results of magnet students is because of bringing in lower performing students in the mix to make MCPS look good. I am sure if you look at individual scores of high performing magnet students who are not-URM they have remained steady or even improved. That is why the achievement gap among the races continue to grow. MCPS cannot take the place of involved parents. That's an edge that these high performing students have for now.
I notice that you equated "URM students" and "uninvolved parents".
Make that "academically uninvolved parents". I also mean those URM student who are NOT offspring of educated immigrants from Africa or Latin countries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That may be true. However, the decline in results of magnet students is because of bringing in lower performing students in the mix to make MCPS look good. I am sure if you look at individual scores of high performing magnet students who are not-URM they have remained steady or even improved. That is why the achievement gap among the races continue to grow. MCPS cannot take the place of involved parents. That's an edge that these high performing students have for now.
I notice that you equated "URM students" and "uninvolved parents".