Anonymous wrote:White House says it cannot lawfully pay subsidies to health insurance companies under President Obama's health care law.
In other words, If Congress won't act we'll kill millions on our own/
Anonymous wrote:So glad my mom just took a new job giving her employer health insurance, because she can't afford the exchange anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that's a great thing. i want it to collapse.
It was poorly thought out and rammed through. It's been a disaster. No need to throw more money at it. Everywhere this type of government run healthcare is tried, it fails.
Do you know what else was failing, even worse? The healthcare system that preceded the ACA.
That was true for some, not true for others. ACA created an entire new class of "underinsured middle-class Americans." My friend's SIL is a doctor, and he said he saw a big switch in his patient base - many more low income people (getting free care) and much fewer middle income people (who can no longer afford it).
Your friend's SIL?? Who uses a male pronoun? Me thinks you're fibbing.
Not only that, it's triple hearsay. How credible is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that's a great thing. i want it to collapse.
It was poorly thought out and rammed through. It's been a disaster. No need to throw more money at it. Everywhere this type of government run healthcare is tried, it fails.
Do you know what else was failing, even worse? The healthcare system that preceded the ACA.
That was true for some, not true for others. ACA created an entire new class of "underinsured middle-class Americans." My friend's SIL is a doctor, and he said he saw a big switch in his patient base - many more low income people (getting free care) and much fewer middle income people (who can no longer afford it).
Your friend's SIL?? Who uses a male pronoun? Me thinks you're fibbing.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that's a great thing. i want it to collapse.
It was poorly thought out and rammed through. It's been a disaster. No need to throw more money at it. Everywhere this type of government run healthcare is tried, it fails.
It's been a lifesaver for people with serious illnesses and no healthcare coverage. It has literally saved many, many lives.
You may think that's a disaster because your premiums are higher, but lives are being saved by ACA.
Why not push to fix Obama care and bring your premiums down instead of ditching the entire thing and letting the critically ill fend for themselves and die?
You can have both, lower premiums and universal health care coverage. It only requires political will. And the willingness to negotiate drug prices with Big Pharma.
Obama wrote into the law no negotiating drug prices with Big Pharma. Remember the WH meeting where big Pharma came out with smiles and changed to supporters? Big Pharma is a big time supporter of ACA,
The government doesn’t buy drugs under the ACA. Drugs are covered under the insurance policies provided by insurance companies. So how could Obama have done what you say? If you are referring to Medicare, there is such a prohibition, but it has nothing to do with Obama or the ACA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that's a great thing. i want it to collapse.
It was poorly thought out and rammed through. It's been a disaster. No need to throw more money at it. Everywhere this type of government run healthcare is tried, it fails.
So you want people whose lives have been saved by the insurance they were finally able to get through the ACA to die. Got it.
ACA was not a disaster for millions of people who finally were able to get insurance including several members of my family.
Anonymous wrote:I think that's a great thing. i want it to collapse.
It was poorly thought out and rammed through. It's been a disaster. No need to throw more money at it. Everywhere this type of government run healthcare is tried, it fails.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like he is defying the law. And he will unilaterally own the fallout, although it seems certain to face legal challenges.
For a party that just went on about DACA needing to be handled by the law, this must surely be an affront to you.
Anonymous wrote:Going forward, it's TrumpCare.
If it isn't covered and you thought it was, that's on Trump.
If it is more expensive, then it's on Trump.
If you have caps, its on Trump.
If pre-existing isn't covered, it's on Trump.