Anonymous wrote:Cash, no contingency except for an inspection. Unfortunately, few of us can be in that position. But you can deal with the cash issue with a pre-qualified mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In late Spring we accepted a full price, all cash offer from a buyer who started with a low ball offer. We had three offers that first week, two at full price. After the inspection, buyer requested 15% in lowered price. House located where market not as hot as immediate D.C. area, and in basically sound condition. Buyer walked when we said no to lower price. Lesson learned? We lost two other buyers, continued carrying empty house with summer maintenance required, and market slowed down mid-summer. Lesson learned? If a buyer is a pain in the neck initially, will continue to generate drama for the seller. It's not worth it. I will never accept a lowballer's offer again.
But you should have been able to keep the EMD then, right? If it was a substantial amount, then that is compensation for your time and money spent while the house was off the market and not selling.
And since you accepted a full-price offer, why does this affect accepting a lowball offer? If you negotiate a lowball to near list, then you obvious have a buyer who is willing to negotiated and work with you. As opposed to the slime who put in a full price offer with no intent to pay full price.
Nobody keeps the EMD of a buyer who walks on the inspection contingency.
Not true. You have to show proof that there were issues in the inspection that triggered the lower price offer. If the indie tion found no issues that justified the lower price then the buyer cannot activate the inspection contingency and just randomly lower the price. Price adjustments have to be based on inspection issues flagged during the inspection.
If there were major issues flagged then it wasn't just an unwarranted price adjustment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In late Spring we accepted a full price, all cash offer from a buyer who started with a low ball offer. We had three offers that first week, two at full price. After the inspection, buyer requested 15% in lowered price. House located where market not as hot as immediate D.C. area, and in basically sound condition. Buyer walked when we said no to lower price. Lesson learned? We lost two other buyers, continued carrying empty house with summer maintenance required, and market slowed down mid-summer. Lesson learned? If a buyer is a pain in the neck initially, will continue to generate drama for the seller. It's not worth it. I will never accept a lowballer's offer again.
But you should have been able to keep the EMD then, right? If it was a substantial amount, then that is compensation for your time and money spent while the house was off the market and not selling.
And since you accepted a full-price offer, why does this affect accepting a lowball offer? If you negotiate a lowball to near list, then you obvious have a buyer who is willing to negotiated and work with you. As opposed to the slime who put in a full price offer with no intent to pay full price.
Nobody keeps the EMD of a buyer who walks on the inspection contingency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In late Spring we accepted a full price, all cash offer from a buyer who started with a low ball offer. We had three offers that first week, two at full price. After the inspection, buyer requested 15% in lowered price. House located where market not as hot as immediate D.C. area, and in basically sound condition. Buyer walked when we said no to lower price. Lesson learned? We lost two other buyers, continued carrying empty house with summer maintenance required, and market slowed down mid-summer. Lesson learned? If a buyer is a pain in the neck initially, will continue to generate drama for the seller. It's not worth it. I will never accept a lowballer's offer again.
But you should have been able to keep the EMD then, right? If it was a substantial amount, then that is compensation for your time and money spent while the house was off the market and not selling.
And since you accepted a full-price offer, why does this affect accepting a lowball offer? If you negotiate a lowball to near list, then you obvious have a buyer who is willing to negotiated and work with you. As opposed to the slime who put in a full price offer with no intent to pay full price.
Anonymous wrote:If it's a relocation some sellers may have a back up price from their company that's better for them then coming down any more. Never lose a house you love for a few thousand dollars just to prove a point or feel the need to "win". In the long run it's not worth it.
Anonymous wrote:In late Spring we accepted a full price, all cash offer from a buyer who started with a low ball offer. We had three offers that first week, two at full price. After the inspection, buyer requested 15% in lowered price. House located where market not as hot as immediate D.C. area, and in basically sound condition. Buyer walked when we said no to lower price. Lesson learned? We lost two other buyers, continued carrying empty house with summer maintenance required, and market slowed down mid-summer. Lesson learned? If a buyer is a pain in the neck initially, will continue to generate drama for the seller. It's not worth it. I will never accept a lowballer's offer again.
Anonymous wrote:
We walked away, but in our case there was a 75K difference.
Six months later, it still wasn't sold, we offered the same lowball price, and they accepted our offer.