Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adios, asshole. A major player in the subjugation and objectification of women is gone!
Didn't all these women do what they did with him willingly?
Women desperate for money aren't on a level playing field with men who have tons of money, power and influence.
Women may finally find themselves equal to men in all areas when they decide to stop acting like perpetual victims. Take responsibility for decisions. These women made a choice. They weren’t oppressed or victimized. To suggest otherwise implies we are weak.
Careful, your privilege is showing.
Let me just guess: you are white and upper-middle class, and have been your whole life. You have never known what it is like to be hungry or homeless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women used him for fame and fortune. The usage was mutual. Each benefited and got something they wanted.
This is not the same as abuse.
Total BS. Any woman over age 40 was totally useless and might as well have been dead as far as Hefner and his ilk were concerned. They used women like Kleenex, nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:He gave blank checks to MLK to fund the civil rights movement and funded lawyers to support Roe v. Wade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adios, asshole. A major player in the subjugation and objectification of women is gone!
Didn't all these women do what they did with him willingly?
If a woman willingly stays with a man who beats her, does that make it okay?
Anonymous wrote:These were consenting women. He helped launch a lot of careers. I wish I could've gone to one of his parties.
- Straight, boring, married, suburban mom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women used him for fame and fortune. The usage was mutual. Each benefited and got something they wanted.
This is not the same as abuse.
Total BS. Any woman over age 40 was totally useless and might as well have been dead as far as Hefner and his ilk were concerned. They used women like Kleenex, nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He gave blank checks to MLK to fund the civil rights movement and funded lawyers to support Roe v. Wade.
+1. Once I learned this about him, I was became team Playboy!
Anonymous wrote:Women used him for fame and fortune. The usage was mutual. Each benefited and got something they wanted.
This is not the same as abuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh. I support everyone's right to do what they want, and I certainly don't think there should be censorship. That being said, I never dated guys who read Playboy (or Maxim, etc) or were heavily into porn. Wasn't interested in guys who are into that.
Aren't most heterosexual men into hot, naked women?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ladies, let's not start calling the women he used ho's/bimbos/sluts/whatever. Remember Mean Girls- if we call each other that, it just makes it okay for men to call us that, too.
Who cares whether women OR men call women who ARE ho's/bimbos/sluts what they actually are? Both men and women use the word asshole to describe a certain type of male and no one has a problem with that.
"Asshole" doesn't refer to a man's sexuality. No woman should be called names because of her sexuality.