Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why should they give the results?
1. Because it takes the place of DRA and they had to report DRA.
2. We have NO OTHER away to figure out how our kid is doing as the report card is a gobbelty gook of meaningless numbers the depend even more upon the teachers view than the DRA did.
3. Because what are they hiding that they won't report it to parents - perhaps that switching was a big mistake?
4. Because all parents regardless of zip code should be allowed to see the test results, not just the ones who "know to ask" because they have access to this site or the web or could read the letter sent home
That's why it should be standardized
Either my kid didn't get a DRA test last year or, more likely, I didn't receive his score. Since he's reading above grade level, I didn't ask. I was curious. I'll ask for the iready score.
Anonymous wrote:Why should they give the results?
1. Because it takes the place of DRA and they had to report DRA.
2. We have NO OTHER away to figure out how our kid is doing as the report card is a gobbelty gook of meaningless numbers the depend even more upon the teachers view than the DRA did.
3. Because what are they hiding that they won't report it to parents - perhaps that switching was a big mistake?
4. Because all parents regardless of zip code should be allowed to see the test results, not just the ones who "know to ask" because they have access to this site or the web or could read the letter sent home
That's why it should be standardized
Anonymous wrote:Why should they give the results?
1. Because it takes the place of DRA and they had to report DRA.
2. We have NO OTHER away to figure out how our kid is doing as the report card is a gobbelty gook of meaningless numbers the depend even more upon the teachers view than the DRA did.
3. Because what are they hiding that they won't report it to parents - perhaps that switching was a big mistake?
4. Because all parents regardless of zip code should be allowed to see the test results, not just the ones who "know to ask" because they have access to this site or the web or could read the letter sent home
That's why it should be standardized
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was encouraging a kid to keep going on the iReady and noticed that the word "archaeologist" was spelled wrong in the test. Lovely. The county just released a memo saying that schools have the choice to send a letter with results, have teachers give results in conferences, or only give results to parents when asked. Schools can choose.
This makes no sense. Why can't the county just have a standard. This isn't something that needs to be teacher or school specific.
Anonymous wrote:I was encouraging a kid to keep going on the iReady and noticed that the word "archaeologist" was spelled wrong in the test. Lovely. The county just released a memo saying that schools have the choice to send a letter with results, have teachers give results in conferences, or only give results to parents when asked. Schools can choose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IReady takes a very long time. My students are quickly wearing out and just click any answer to get to the games that are embedded. Then I have to give a DRA to kids who don't do well. I haven't learned anything helpful from the scores. By the time they get to the part with the reading stories, after all the phonics and other isolated skills they are toast. They are told to just guess if they don't know an answer, so they are. A waste of instructional time like you wouldn't believe.
So stop and finish it later.
There's no time. When you have 25 students to test and a limited window, you are either completely giving up on instruction for weeks or just doing what the PP above said and telling them to guess and giving them the DRA.
I hate the iready test. It's not developmentally appropriate, it's too long, and it's not giving meaningful data.
Anonymous wrote:When will parents receive the IReady results? I'm curious as to whether they seem at all accurate, or whether the results seem way off. I hope teachers don't use these in place of the DRA tests, considering that a one-on-one test will be much more accurate than a computerized one for young children.
Anonymous wrote:There's no time. When you have 25 students to test and a limited window, you are either completely giving up on instruction for weeks or just doing what the PP above said and telling them to guess and giving them the DRA.
I hate the iready test. It's not developmentally appropriate, it's too long, and it's not giving meaningful data
Definitely this- I truly think someone who bought the test for FCPS or was involved in the decision making process posts here because it is so clearly the wrong way to go. I am wondering what the correlation between DRA level and iready test score is. Teachers still have book baskets in DRA form- are they being told to switch to lexile level that the DRA test supposedly gives or is there a conversion chart? If there is a conversion chart, it is not on the iready website and is it made public for parents??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IReady takes a very long time. My students are quickly wearing out and just click any answer to get to the games that are embedded. Then I have to give a DRA to kids who don't do well. I haven't learned anything helpful from the scores. By the time they get to the part with the reading stories, after all the phonics and other isolated skills they are toast. They are told to just guess if they don't know an answer, so they are. A waste of instructional time like you wouldn't believe.
So stop and finish it later.