Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

Who gives a flying rat's ass who submitted the application?! Clearly our intelligence agencies smelled a rat and acted on it. The fact that it required the president's signature does not mean jack! If their noses were clean, they wouldn't be the subject of wiretaps. They're a bunch of cockroaches.

They didn't 'smell a rat" and randomly. 5eyes caught them all and reported back to the US, who then went through proper, legal channels, as established by the BUSH ADMINISTRATION, to surveil legally.

The idea that morons on this board don't understand how any of this works and are simply trying to blame the black guy because the orange guy was colluding with the red guys is simply astounding.

Take responsibility you snowflakes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha ha ha hahahahahahahahaha ahhhhhhh

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha haha

Ha

But it's a nothingburger, right, Trumpsters?

You think having your phone conversation taped is something to laugh about? You need to change your thinking, this is bad that this was extended for political purposes. This is really bad.

Jesus Christ people, Manafort is a REALLY BAD GUY. No, I don't feel bad about his phone conversations being taped, as long as the proper procedures were followed to obtain the necessary warrant to do that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

This

Remember how much blowback Trump got from the lame stream media when he said Obama wiretapped him? Sick!

No the FBI was carrying out a routine counterintelligence investigation. Just because you join a political campaign doesn't give you a free pass to run a criminal operation.

Why no "routine counterintelligence investigation" into the Clinton Foundation when she was hauling in hundreds of millions of dollars while SOS? Weird.

Shut. The. F*ck. Up. About hillary. No one cares. Stop the whataboutism. This is about the most corrupt administration in history.

These people are insane.

Language please. There are 60,000,000 plus citizens that care, corruption was the main theme of the Obama administration and the Clinton Foundation. It's a shame you have stopped being a citizen and are a partisan hack instead. Such a shame.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

What an asinine train of thought. Our education system's got to produce better minds than this. Good Lord, help us.

Remember, we elected Trump. The average voter is a moron.

You're right - I'll take that with a chaser, next time.

Anonymous wrote:Ha ha ha hahahahahahahahaha ahhhhhhh

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha haha

Ha

But it's a nothingburger, right, Trumpsters?

You think having your phone conversation taped is something to laugh about? You need to change your thinking, this is bad that this was extended for political purposes. This is really bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

IT WAS ALL LEGAL BECAUSE COLLUSION

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the left seeing once again that Trump didn't lie or the left ignoring Obama's EO 2 weeks before leaving office that opened this can of worms?

So, let me get this straight. You think this is all Obama's fault?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

What an asinine train of thought. Our education system's got to produce better minds than this. Good Lord, help us.

Remember, we elected Trump. The average voter is a moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

DINGO. You have no idea how FISA warrants get issued if this is what you think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

What an asinine train of thought. Our education system's got to produce better minds than this. Good Lord, help us.

Which is worse - the left seeing once again that Trump didn't lie or the left ignoring Obama's EO 2 weeks before leaving office that opened this can of worms?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

Who gives a flying rat's ass who submitted the application?! Clearly our intelligence agencies smelled a rat and acted on it. The fact that it required the president's signature does not mean jack! If their noses were clean, they wouldn't be the subject of wiretaps. They're a bunch of cockroaches.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

B-I-N-G-O.

Donald jr doesn't want Secret Service protection anymore. Methinks he might be looking to measure curtain treatment in Moscow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Someone in the Obama administration submitted the application. Obama had to be briefed and concurred. It was essentially a back door to wiretap Trump.

I am not sure this is good for the Obama administration.

As someone who's very disappointed in trump's win, I have to admit this latest revelation reflects poorly on former President Obama. Very poorly.

It also seems corroborate trump's wiretapping claim.

Why? Do you think the President has anything to do with a legal proceeding between the FBI and FISA court? If you do, then you are misinformed as to how these things work.