Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Hogan is an autocrat and anti-environmental governor.”
In all other scenarios, when someone approves mass transit this is normally considered to be overall a good thing for the environment. Funny how that’s different here you say...
I work in that field, ridership is down across the nation, not just here because the issues metro is having but for the past 4 years it has been a steady decline in ridership.
If you are given the chance to work remotely would you? That is what is happening. People are not going to give up that perk and then get on a crowded bus or train that is dirty and not reliable. Ridership is 1/3 of what it used to be on Mondays and Fridays, Wednesdays are down 20% while Tuesday and Thursday are down 15%
Metro took a year to do their surge to decrease the number of arching insulators, they have increased.
Most transit is funded by the government through grants so understand that those in the positions to create transit, will do so for job security.
Sure people will be excited and wowed by the first few months of service but then like most transit projects they decline in ridership, condition etc etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason I'm opposed to the Purple Line is because it's being implemented by a rethuglican governor. If a Dem were doing it, I'd be all for it.
Yes, I know that is trivial. So politics is trivial, tell me something I don't know.
But I'm pissed that hogan is going to take credit for it.
We held off casinos back when erlich wanted them, just to F him, and we did. Then s soon as he was gone, BOOM, casinos.
That's how it should've been with the purple line. Dumbass people in this state have forgotten how to play politics. It's a contact sport.
Quoted for sheer awesomeness
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Hogan is an autocrat and anti-environmental governor.”
In all other scenarios, when someone approves mass transit this is normally considered to be overall a good thing for the environment. Funny how that’s different here you say...
I work in that field, ridership is down across the nation, not just here because the issues metro is having but for the past 4 years it has been a steady decline in ridership.
If you are given the chance to work remotely would you? That is what is happening. People are not going to give up that perk and then get on a crowded bus or train that is dirty and not reliable. Ridership is 1/3 of what it used to be on Mondays and Fridays, Wednesdays are down 20% while Tuesday and Thursday are down 15%
Metro took a year to do their surge to decrease the number of arching insulators, they have increased.
Most transit is funded by the government through grants so understand that those in the positions to create transit, will do so for job security.
Sure people will be excited and wowed by the first few months of service but then like most transit projects they decline in ridership, condition etc etc
Anonymous wrote:“Hogan is an autocrat and anti-environmental governor.”
In all other scenarios, when someone approves mass transit this is normally considered to be overall a good thing for the environment. Funny how that’s different here you say...
Anonymous wrote:The only reason I'm opposed to the Purple Line is because it's being implemented by a rethuglican governor. If a Dem were doing it, I'd be all for it.
Yes, I know that is trivial. So politics is trivial, tell me something I don't know.
But I'm pissed that hogan is going to take credit for it.
We held off casinos back when erlich wanted them, just to F him, and we did. Then s soon as he was gone, BOOM, casinos.
That's how it should've been with the purple line. Dumbass people in this state have forgotten how to play politics. It's a contact sport.
Anonymous wrote:“Hogan is an autocrat and anti-environmental governor.”
In all other scenarios, when someone approves mass transit this is normally considered to be overall a good thing for the environment. Funny how that’s different here you say...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Purple Line is a net environmental gain for the region.
Keep on drinking the Kool Aid
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well I am cautiously optimistic about this since I have a home that is fairly close to a purple line. When it's finally done we will be able to ride it to Downtown Silver Spring
Downside is that there is likely going to be construction in my neck of the woods for the forseeable future. My husband and I are taking informal that's about when this is actually be up and running probably 6 or 7 years?
You will make $$$$$ when you sell!
I too am near enough to walk to a station but far enough away to not be on top of it for noise, traffic problems. I think it will have a very nice impact on my property value.
Anonymous wrote:Give it a rest folks, the war is over. Go back to your trenches and find something else to complain about.
Anyone who lives or works around Bethesda and Silver Spring supports the PL, with the understandable exception of those whose property is right on the route.
Fwiw few if any infrastructure projects ever really take traffic off the road, simply because additional lanes or new roads simply change traffic patterns. And because they are typically undertaken in areas that are growing and projected to continue growing -- so traffic by definition was on the rise with or without the project.
The Big Dig in Boston, which was at the time the most expensive project of its kind and took years as well as billions in federal money, was projected to reduce traffic minimally. But anyone who lived or travelled in Boston before and after the project would agree it's been a huge improvement in the quality of life in the city (and in my experience traffic patterns are improved.) So if what you want is fewer cars, you're using the wrong metric.
Anonymous wrote:Purple Line is a net environmental gain for the region.