Anonymous wrote:Any word on the Reed school, and whether it will be a choice program vs neighborhood school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
I think Colin Brown staid 790 at back to school night earlier this week.
Ha. That's before all the State dept kids arrive mid year. Ha ha ha
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Mckinley gets a lot of state department and other federal agency families.
And others don't? Not to mention the off-setting kids who leave for the same reason.
Why does it matter whether enrollment is 790 or 810? Either way, it's way too overcrowded.
I hope you take the same approach to all APS schools, not just McKinley.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Mckinley gets a lot of state department and other federal agency families.
And others don't? Not to mention the off-setting kids who leave for the same reason.
Why does it matter whether enrollment is 790 or 810? Either way, it's way too overcrowded.
Anonymous wrote:I didn't realize Randolph was over crowded, that is a change from a couple years ago. And it is a disgrace.
Anonymous wrote:Also, according to this, parents at Henry should be complaining more, compared to those at McKinley or Tuckahoe! Henry will be at 144% for this school year?!?! Am I reading that wrong?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And then you have schools like Carlin Springs, Randolph and Barcroft that are not over crowded because half of the families that are not in low income high rises send their kids to choice schools to avoid low performing schools!
If the boundaries were seriously redrawn so that those schools were not so hopelessly lower performing spots would open up at the choice schools. Then parents from seriously overcrowded schools (and are overcrowded because they are high performing) could have slots into the choice schools.
That would relieve some over crowding.
I can't speak for Barcroft or Carlin Springs, but Randolph is slightly over capacity (but only has two trailers). It's obviously not a situation like the truly overcrowded schools, but it's not like there are dozens of empty seats.
-Randolph Parent
Anonymous wrote:And then you have schools like Carlin Springs, Randolph and Barcroft that are not over crowded because half of the families that are not in low income high rises send their kids to choice schools to avoid low performing schools!
If the boundaries were seriously redrawn so that those schools were not so hopelessly lower performing spots would open up at the choice schools. Then parents from seriously overcrowded schools (and are overcrowded because they are high performing) could have slots into the choice schools.
That would relieve some over crowding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Mckinley gets a lot of state department and other federal agency families.
And others don't? Not to mention the off-setting kids who leave for the same reason.
Anonymous wrote: Mckinley gets a lot of state department and other federal agency families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
I think Colin Brown staid 790 at back to school night earlier this week.
Ha. That's before all the State dept kids arrive mid year. Ha ha ha
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Capacity_Utilization_FallProjections17-26_Final_Web.pdf
At least one school is already severely off the projections, so don't look at these as having any reflection on actual reality. Despite being provided numbers to the contrary, APS stuck with their 757 projection for McKinley. Final numbers don't come in until 30 September but it looks to be over 800.
I think Colin Brown staid 790 at back to school night earlier this week.
Ah, so people are already backing off the "over 800" claim that was floating around here the week before school started?