Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
OP: Please do not take legal advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between "council" and "counsel."
I had an experience similar to what the PP has described: a buyer wanted to walk away, our realtor had weak knees and insisted that we return the earnest money. We had a big argument about it but the funds ultimately were not in our bank account. It seemed that he just didn't want to be caught up in any legal battle, and wanted to play nice with the buyer's realtor. We did finally agree to return the EM and promptly fired our realtor.
So I do believe it depends on how strong your realtor is.
Why did you cave to your realtor's wishes? There are pros and cons to holding out for the EMD and/or suing to get damages. But the position of your realtor on this should be virtually irrelevant. If you wanted to fight, you should have reminded your realtor that he worked for you and you were going to stand by your contractual rights even if it made things awkward for him with the other realtor, which it really shouldn't have since the other realtor should have understood you were well within your rights to insist on the EMD.
Because the seller realtor is a part of the transaction. It's not a productive endeavor to go into a battle where I have no allies. It became apparent to me that my realtor was willing to lose me as a customer than to help me keep the EM. Whatever his reasons, I did not care. My goal as a seller was to sell the house. I had already wasted time up to that point, I did not want to get drawn into a prolonged battle - lawyers do not take these type of cases on contingency.
So, it sounds like it wasn't your realtor wanting to play nice with the other realtor. You wanted to sell your house and you didn't want to incur legal fees - both very reasonable objectives. And you understood that by trying to keep the EMD and/or sue, you wouldn't be able to sell your house until the dispute was resolved and you would likely incur legal fess. So, given your priorities, you decided to return the EMD.
What you did was perfectly reasonable given your priorities, but I don't think it was reasonable to say that you acted because your realtor had "weak knees and insisted" you return the EMD. You acted in your best interest, as you now describe them, which is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
OP: Please do not take legal advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between "council" and "counsel."
I had an experience similar to what the PP has described: a buyer wanted to walk away, our realtor had weak knees and insisted that we return the earnest money. We had a big argument about it but the funds ultimately were not in our bank account. It seemed that he just didn't want to be caught up in any legal battle, and wanted to play nice with the buyer's realtor. We did finally agree to return the EM and promptly fired our realtor.
So I do believe it depends on how strong your realtor is.
Why did you cave to your realtor's wishes? There are pros and cons to holding out for the EMD and/or suing to get damages. But the position of your realtor on this should be virtually irrelevant. If you wanted to fight, you should have reminded your realtor that he worked for you and you were going to stand by your contractual rights even if it made things awkward for him with the other realtor, which it really shouldn't have since the other realtor should have understood you were well within your rights to insist on the EMD.
Because the seller realtor is a part of the transaction. It's not a productive endeavor to go into a battle where I have no allies. It became apparent to me that my realtor was willing to lose me as a customer than to help me keep the EM. Whatever his reasons, I did not care. My goal as a seller was to sell the house. I had already wasted time up to that point, I did not want to get drawn into a prolonged battle - lawyers do not take these type of cases on contingency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
OP: Please do not take legal advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between "council" and "counsel."
I had an experience similar to what the PP has described: a buyer wanted to walk away, our realtor had weak knees and insisted that we return the earnest money. We had a big argument about it but the funds ultimately were not in our bank account. It seemed that he just didn't want to be caught up in any legal battle, and wanted to play nice with the buyer's realtor. We did finally agree to return the EM and promptly fired our realtor.
So I do believe it depends on how strong your realtor is.
Why did you cave to your realtor's wishes? There are pros and cons to holding out for the EMD and/or suing to get damages. But the position of your realtor on this should be virtually irrelevant. If you wanted to fight, you should have reminded your realtor that he worked for you and you were going to stand by your contractual rights even if it made things awkward for him with the other realtor, which it really shouldn't have since the other realtor should have understood you were well within your rights to insist on the EMD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
OP: Please do not take legal advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between "council" and "counsel."
I had an experience similar to what the PP has described: a buyer wanted to walk away, our realtor had weak knees and insisted that we return the earnest money. We had a big argument about it but the funds ultimately were not in our bank account. It seemed that he just didn't want to be caught up in any legal battle, and wanted to play nice with the buyer's realtor. We did finally agree to return the EM and promptly fired our realtor.
So I do believe it depends on how strong your realtor is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
OP: Please do not take legal advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between "council" and "counsel."
Anonymous wrote:Also if your seller is a lawyer-You are f*kd. And its the DC area-its possible. Remember if they are a lawyer they don't have to pay for one-it makes a difference in their likelihood to sue you.
Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
Anonymous wrote:Contact a real estate Attorney and discuss options.
The chance you will get sued is low. The reason being is its not worth it to the seller for the cost of retaining their own council and then going to court in a few months and preparing for the case.
If the sellers goal is to sell the house and the house is in a decent location, their real estate agent will likely advise them to just return the EM and move on. The agent knows that the buyer can easily stall at closing or find some issue to prevent closing. Better to not waste everyone's time going to a closing that will likely not happen. In the time it will take the seller to get to court, the probability is high that they will have already sold the to someone else and it won't be worth their time and expense to go through a drawn out court case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Even if a real estate agent is a lawyer by training, they cannot provide legal advice to a client. The first thing a realtor does to "manage these types of scenarios" (which are very rare) is to advise the client to contact a lawyer who actually knows how to "manage these types of scenarios." In my very long career with nearly a thousand transactions, only one buyer pulled out of the contract at the last minute. The seller took her $10,000 deposit; successfully sued her for $50,000 in damages, and she paid nearly $30,000 in legal fees for herself and the seller's lawyer. This was in 1995.
Wow. That was a lot of money in 1995. You could have a comfortable house in Chevy Chase village for 600k in those days.
Why did the buyer back out?
The house was $450,000 and was in Old Town Alexandria. It is probably about $1.2M to $1.3M today. She never provided a good reason to me, her lawyer, the seller or the judge.