Anonymous wrote:LDS loves the entire world including Africa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the multiple wives. And the fabulous skiing.
Seriously though, Utah is a kind of intolerant place. Look at the recent fights for LGBT rights, and the resulting "compromise". And women's rights aren't exactly held in high regard there either.
Exactly. Also, everyone looks like this:
Old dude's got three wives but what about the young dudes?
Anonymous wrote:Black woman here with LDS friends ... I'm still alive and kicking and not enslaved in their basements. Uh oh, some are even in interracial marriages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the multiple wives. And the fabulous skiing.
Seriously though, Utah is a kind of intolerant place. Look at the recent fights for LGBT rights, and the resulting "compromise". And women's rights aren't exactly held in high regard there either.
Exactly. Also, everyone looks like this:
Anonymous wrote:Everyone I have met from Utah has been so damn courteous and friendly.
What is it about Utah that makes people from there so nice?
Anonymous wrote:Black woman here with LDS friends ... I'm still alive and kicking and not enslaved in their basements. Uh oh, some are even in interracial marriages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with looking white?
Nothing is wrong with it, and nobody has said that there is.
OK, so what does PP mean when she says not every family should look like this?
I'm the PP who said that I didn't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. What I meant was, I don't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. Do you think that every family should look like the family in the picture?
No, of course not. And not everyone in Utah, nor every Mormon, DOES look like that...so, pretty stupid comment.
Sure. But the picture is from an LDS publication.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with looking white?
Nothing is wrong with it, and nobody has said that there is.
OK, so what does PP mean when she says not every family should look like this?
I'm the PP who said that I didn't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. What I meant was, I don't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. Do you think that every family should look like the family in the picture?
No, of course not. And not everyone in Utah, nor every Mormon, DOES look like that...so, pretty stupid comment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with looking white?
Nothing is wrong with it, and nobody has said that there is.
OK, so what does PP mean when she says not every family should look like this?
I'm the PP who said that I didn't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. What I meant was, I don't think that every family should look like the family in the picture. Do you think that every family should look like the family in the picture?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with looking white?
Nothing is wrong with it, and nobody has said that there is.
OK, so what does PP mean when she says not every family should look like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's superficial.
This is what I've heard. People are incredibly pleasant in a superficial way, but unless you are one of them (mormon) it's very hard to make a friend.