Anonymous wrote:I read the Post article about the speech and it sounds like he was attempting to describe how others see SE DC kids, not trying to stereotype them himself...
As an aside, as the parent of an incoming pre-K student in DCPS, this type of story makes me wary of being involved in my son's new school. I've seen it firsthand on the listserv: everyone is waiting to pounce on anything that someone somewhere could theoretically construe as potentially racist. No one will give you the benefit of the doubt or try to figure out what you intended--it absolutely must be the worst possible interpretation and it must be proclaimed to the entire school that you are a racist. Better to lay low, not get involved, and not risk the wrath of the mob...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
He was actively refuting that stereotype! I agree that broken homes is a ridiculous term, but he was referring to that having been said in the past by other people and saying that it was false.
Could the presentation have been done more skillfully? Absolutely.
Was the reaction appropriate? Not even remotely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
He was actively refuting that stereotype! I agree that broken homes is a ridiculous term, but he was referring to that having been said in the past by other people and saying that it was false.
Could the presentation have been done more skillfully? Absolutely.
Was the reaction appropriate? Not even remotely.
That's what it sounds like to me: he was repeating wrong-minded stereotypes for the purpose of illustrating that point, but wasn't very good at that type of self-consciously ironic delivery. It is very hard to pull off. Preachers tend to be very good at that. But also, many people aren't very good at picking up on this nuance unless it is extremely exaggerated.
I agree. Ironic "air quotes" approach to refuting stereotypes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
He was actively refuting that stereotype! I agree that broken homes is a ridiculous term, but he was referring to that having been said in the past by other people and saying that it was false.
Could the presentation have been done more skillfully? Absolutely.
Was the reaction appropriate? Not even remotely.
That's what it sounds like to me: he was repeating wrong-minded stereotypes for the purpose of illustrating that point, but wasn't very good at that type of self-consciously ironic delivery. It is very hard to pull off. Preachers tend to be very good at that. But also, many people aren't very good at picking up on this nuance unless it is extremely exaggerated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
He was actively refuting that stereotype! I agree that broken homes is a ridiculous term, but he was referring to that having been said in the past by other people and saying that it was false.
Could the presentation have been done more skillfully? Absolutely.
Was the reaction appropriate? Not even remotely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
What?! Who still uses this term?
Many people. It's very accurate.
Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious...i am assuming he was not AA. If he were, I'm imagining there wouldn't be so much outrage. Am I right?
AA teacher here. The outrage (at least from me) would be worse. I'm sick of self-loathing black people who feel they need to curry favor with the powers that be by spouting tired old lies and myths about the black community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He said "not just those kids in south east from broken homes."
What?! Who still uses this term?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious...i am assuming he was not AA. If he were, I'm imagining there wouldn't be so much outrage. Am I right?