Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my early thirties in a dead end field and going back to school for nursing next year. Absolutely buzzy feeling to know my earning power will increase exponentially and predictably in this field, especially with additional education.
Yeah, but you have to be a nurse. I love the idea of this, except the touching gross people part.
+ 1
Blood, urine, feces, vomit, gore. No thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no safe jobs anymore in the age of artificial intelligence.
Are robots going to be giving speech therapy? Are robots going to be cutting our hair? I don't think so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one sees this thread as pretty sexist and reactionary? Women have always been consigned the roles of teacher or nurse, the most acceptable profession for college-educated women since the 1940s. Has nothing really changed?
Well, these are union jobs. The question was about job stability, not breaking the glass ceiling.
What I'm saying is that it's sad that things have not evolved so that women have more career choices with stability. Nothing wrong with nursing or teaching, but it's 2017. We should be able to be IT professionals, lawyers, scientists, etc. with some sort of work-life, non-ageist work balance by now.
--A 50-something journalist with a fairly stable job...considering the implosion of a lot of the profession
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my early thirties in a dead end field and going back to school for nursing next year. Absolutely buzzy feeling to know my earning power will increase exponentially and predictably in this field, especially with additional education.
Yeah, but you have to be a nurse. I love the idea of this, except the touching gross people part.
Anonymous wrote:I spent 10 years as an Executive Assistant, and now in my 10th year as a finance professional, first in private and now federal. That's 20 years without a layoff and increasing pay and at one point decent bonuses.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my early thirties in a dead end field and going back to school for nursing next year. Absolutely buzzy feeling to know my earning power will increase exponentially and predictably in this field, especially with additional education.
What the heck are you talking about?
Nursing is a fine career for many reasons but your salary will not exponentially increase with experience or even with more education. Many nurses take a pay cut if they go back to school for a master's degree.
You will start around $50K in the DC area and in 3 years you may make $75K. In 10-20 years you may make $90K. If you become a nurse practitioner you may make $80-120K.
That's it.
Nursing is awesome and flexible and has a lot going for it. But exponential income increases? NO.
I find that people on this board ALWAYS over estimate what nurses earn.
signed,
RN with 18 years experience in a ton of different fields including as an NP, a nurse recruiter, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my early thirties in a dead end field and going back to school for nursing next year. Absolutely buzzy feeling to know my earning power will increase exponentially and predictably in this field, especially with additional education.
Yeah, but you have to be a nurse. I love the idea of this, except the touching gross people part.
I would be a nurse in the nursery or NICU, but no adults, please.
OT, but there was a poster in a thread on "Expectant Moms" talking about how the changes in staffing and move to baby-friendly hospitals meant that nursing staff got consolidated such that post-partum nurses were also caring for healthy newborns and vice-versa. The newborn nurses mostly left the field, or remain and provide bad care to new moms.
This is true. Many acute care hospitals are moving toward the "a nurse is a nurse" mindset and have no qualms about reassigning nurses trained in one specialty to a unit with a similar, but different speciality as a cost-saving measure (think L&D or well-baby nurses to a postpartum floor, ICU nurses to a stepdown floor). It's called floating, it sucks, and it's a reason nurses leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my early thirties in a dead end field and going back to school for nursing next year. Absolutely buzzy feeling to know my earning power will increase exponentially and predictably in this field, especially with additional education.
What the heck are you talking about?
Nursing is a fine career for many reasons but your salary will not exponentially increase with experience or even with more education. Many nurses take a pay cut if they go back to school for a master's degree.
You will start around $50K in the DC area and in 3 years you may make $75K. In 10-20 years you may make $90K. If you become a nurse practitioner you may make $80-120K.
That's it.
Nursing is awesome and flexible and has a lot going for it. But exponential income increases? NO.
I find that people on this board ALWAYS over estimate what nurses earn.
signed,
RN with 18 years experience in a ton of different fields including as an NP, a nurse recruiter, etc.
+1
- RN with 10 years experience and a MSN who works at the bedside because it's better for finances and work/life balance
I know NPs in the DC area making 120 k with less than 10 years experience. No you aren't going to make 300k, but acting like 120 is unheard of isn't true. Perhaps the wo of you built your careers wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no safe jobs anymore in the age of artificial intelligence.
Are robots going to be giving speech therapy? Are robots going to be cutting our hair? I don't think so.