Anonymous wrote:Pittsburgh has to be one of the most boring places on earth.
Anonymous wrote:Which would you choose to raise two small kids in?
Anonymous wrote:Squirrel Hill in Pittsburgh or Mt Lebanon just outside the city would be your best bets for raising a family. Squirrel Hill has great older homes,in the city, is wslkable. Allderdice is probably the best high school in the City and the elementary schools are good too (Mineo?) that said, Mt Lebanon has better schools (although I think the elem kids still come home for lunch) and is walkable.
As much as I love my old stomping grounds of Shadyside, I wouldn't raise a family there. It is a fantastic neighborhood for 20 somethings and other DINKs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you interested in the city proper, or general metro area? There are nice suburbs in Pittsburgh with decent schools, but no way I'd raise my kids IN the city. There are a lot of great up and coming neighborhoods in city limits for singles/DINKs, but not young families. We considered moving there (DH is from Pittsburgh) but decided against it for that reason.
OP here. I'm open to either, but would prefer a close-in/walkable suburb if I were to go that route.
Shadyside and Squirrel Hill seem like great city neighborhoods for families in Pittsburgh.
Anonymous wrote:Pittsburgh:
1. Cheapest of the three, although the nice areas are still expensive, but par for par compared to other two cities you're likely to fare better on the real estate end. Lots of great and affordable architecture.
2. Smallest city and metro area of the three, but still large enough to have the amenities of a city, with the supermarkets, shops and restaurants you need. Carnegie Mellon and Pitt ensure a sizeable presence of educated professionals in the area. Some good museums and cultural venues.
3. Easy access to the hills and mountains of western Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Hiking, white water rafting, all easily doable.
4. Lots of gentrification and renovation in the downtown area and along the rivers.
Downsides: geographically the most isolated. It's a long drive to the next big city and there's very little in between other than rural America and small, often dying, towns. There's a stronger "rural" and hill folk presence in the metro area. DC snobs might not like this. Urban schools are hit or miss. Pittsburgh is also very hilly, which not everyone likes or appreciates. There's no beltway around Pittsburgh because there are too many hills.
Anonymous wrote:The biggest negative for Pittsburgh is it is full of Yinzers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you interested in the city proper, or general metro area? There are nice suburbs in Pittsburgh with decent schools, but no way I'd raise my kids IN the city. There are a lot of great up and coming neighborhoods in city limits for singles/DINKs, but not young families. We considered moving there (DH is from Pittsburgh) but decided against it for that reason.
OP here. I'm open to either, but would prefer a close-in/walkable suburb if I were to go that route.
Squirrel Hill in Pittsburgh.
Anonymous wrote:Pittsbugh -- it frequently wins that Most Livable City award and it has gotten even better since that started happening.
Anonymous wrote:Baltimore.
Gotta have my crabcakes.